<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Editorial baiting by Twitter: some stereotypes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/11/23/editorial-baiting-by-twitter-some-stereotypes/feed/?12345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/11/23/editorial-baiting-by-twitter-some-stereotypes/</link>
	<description>Just another Speed Communications Blogs site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:01:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journalist-baiting by Twitter: part two &#124; Earlin' PR abuse</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/11/23/editorial-baiting-by-twitter-some-stereotypes/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalist-baiting by Twitter: part two &#124; Earlin' PR abuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/?p=342#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>[...] my post about editorial baiting by Twitter a few weeks ago, a few more stereotypes have sprung to mind, padding out the list to [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my post about editorial baiting by Twitter a few weeks ago, a few more stereotypes have sprung to mind, padding out the list to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let us stem the stinking tide of Twilliteracy &#124; Earlin' PR abuse</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/11/23/editorial-baiting-by-twitter-some-stereotypes/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator>Let us stem the stinking tide of Twilliteracy &#124; Earlin' PR abuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/?p=342#comment-1375</guid>
		<description>[...] building on the Twitter editorial baiting stereotypes of a few weeks ago, let&#8217;s call this digital disease Twilliteracy. I&#8217;m claiming this as [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] building on the Twitter editorial baiting stereotypes of a few weeks ago, let&#8217;s call this digital disease Twilliteracy. I&#8217;m claiming this as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily McDaid</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/11/23/editorial-baiting-by-twitter-some-stereotypes/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily McDaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/?p=342#comment-1374</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clearing that up Steve ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clearing that up Steve <img src='http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif?12345' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wooding</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/11/23/editorial-baiting-by-twitter-some-stereotypes/#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wooding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/?p=342#comment-1373</guid>
		<description>Nice one!

How about Twosser - one of those people you worked with who you knew was shite at their job and was in PR for all the wrong reasons...and then sends a Tweet that proves it. Similar to a T-wit accept for some reason the Twosser is always more senior than you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one!</p>
<p>How about Twosser &#8211; one of those people you worked with who you knew was shite at their job and was in PR for all the wrong reasons&#8230;and then sends a Tweet that proves it. Similar to a T-wit accept for some reason the Twosser is always more senior than you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Goodall</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/11/23/editorial-baiting-by-twitter-some-stereotypes/#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Goodall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/?p=342#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another one for you:

Twoverkill - person sending out multiple tweets saying the same thing but slightly differently and linking to the same article.
 
For those Twoverkillers, here&#039;s some good 140 character advice Twitter engagement from Econsultancy editor, Chris Lake:

Lakey - If you post multiple tweets promoting the same blog article via slightly different headlines then I will unfollow you #noisefail</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another one for you:</p>
<p>Twoverkill &#8211; person sending out multiple tweets saying the same thing but slightly differently and linking to the same article.</p>
<p>For those Twoverkillers, here&#8217;s some good 140 character advice Twitter engagement from Econsultancy editor, Chris Lake:</p>
<p>Lakey &#8211; If you post multiple tweets promoting the same blog article via slightly different headlines then I will unfollow you #noisefail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Waddington</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/11/23/editorial-baiting-by-twitter-some-stereotypes/#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Waddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/?p=342#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>Twanker - over blown and frenzied self-congratulation

Twat - &quot;A derogatory term for a person whose behaviour is considered to be extremely or intolerably ignorant, obnoxious, offensive or moronic.&quot; - Urban Dictionary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twanker &#8211; over blown and frenzied self-congratulation</p>
<p>Twat &#8211; &#8220;A derogatory term for a person whose behaviour is considered to be extremely or intolerably ignorant, obnoxious, offensive or moronic.&#8221; &#8211; Urban Dictionary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/11/23/editorial-baiting-by-twitter-some-stereotypes/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/?p=342#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>Like t&#039;war, as in how an old bloke from Doncaster would talk about the 1939-1945 armed conflict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like t&#8217;war, as in how an old bloke from Doncaster would talk about the 1939-1945 armed conflict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily McDaid</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/11/23/editorial-baiting-by-twitter-some-stereotypes/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily McDaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/?p=342#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>How do you pronounce Twhore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you pronounce Twhore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/11/23/editorial-baiting-by-twitter-some-stereotypes/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/?p=342#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>Twoccasional definitely makes the list. 

Continuing the line of thought, TWOCer (as in Taken Without Content, or joyriding). The joyriders of Twitter are those who retweet with gleeful and wanton abandon but rarely contribute anything of any interest themselves. Perhaps because nothing they say or think is of any particular interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twoccasional definitely makes the list. </p>
<p>Continuing the line of thought, TWOCer (as in Taken Without Content, or joyriding). The joyriders of Twitter are those who retweet with gleeful and wanton abandon but rarely contribute anything of any interest themselves. Perhaps because nothing they say or think is of any particular interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/11/23/editorial-baiting-by-twitter-some-stereotypes/#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/?p=342#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>What about &quot;Twoccasional&quot; - a PR person who only logs on when instructed to by employer/client and pitches own story to echochamber of followers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about &#8220;Twoccasional&#8221; &#8211; a PR person who only logs on when instructed to by employer/client and pitches own story to echochamber of followers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.speedcommunications.com @ 2012-02-10 10:35:44 -->
