Visit speed website Earlin' PR abuse home
September 21st, 2010 by Steve

Me and my twoppelganger

I never had an imaginary friend when I was a child. To be fair, it wouldn’t have been an enviable gig – I told my parents on my seventh birthday that it was “just another day nearer my death”.

Now though, in the intriguing realm of the Twitterverse, I do have a special friend. My Twitter doppelganger, or twoppelganger, if you tolerate the high-brow humour associated with putting a tw in front of all things Twitter.

Earlier today the Twitter account @MyNameIsEarI started following many of the people I follow. I’m @mynameisearl, all lower case. Some have asked whether it’s me messing around, seeking attention (moi?). It’s not. So who is it? A commercial rival seeking to have a dig digitally? A mate with too much time on their hands playing a prank? The producers of the show of a similar name? The location is given as LA, which is presumably Los Angeles rather than Lower Ambleforth, but that may be a lie.

Who knows? And anyway, I’m pretty confident it won’t cause me any problems.

But how is it even possible? Well, the sleuths at Speed have worked out that the last character is a capital I, rather than a lower case l. Cunning indeed.

This does all raise an interesting new point about how ‘imposters’ can potentially snare what at first appears to be the same Twitter identity, then grab followers and masquerade as someone they’re not. It has little bearing on me, but has the potential to poison what a brand may want to do online.

What’s the solution? Well, better regulation of Twitter would be a start, and given its rise to prominence and the commercial fortunes it may develop, surely it needs cementing as a professional-grade service anyway?

In the meantime, I’ll be keeping a close eye on my doppelganger. Twitter promises transparent conversation – so we’d better play nicely.

September 16th, 2010 by Steve

Is the Pope Catholic? Tips for a better Vatican press office

The spokespeople and press officers of large organisations can occasionally put their feet right in it by saying something that generates headlines for all the wrong reasons.

In the case of the Catholic church, the feet must be about a size 18, and the pile of dung about half a mile across.

Granted, it is was always going to be tough for the church to get a wholly glowing message through via conventional or social media in the run-up to the Pope’s visit to the UK, which begins today. Even so, the visit has been mired by controversy for months – and the powers that be at the Vatican seem to be doing their level best to inflame the situation rather than use the media to help fulfil the purpose of the exercise.

Take the Papal aide who has just pulled out of the trip, though apparent illness, after saying landing at Heathrow was like arriving in a third-world country. His remarks may be accurate if you land at terminals two or three, but were the worst-timed viewpoint imaginable.

Why do senior figures within the Catholic church persist in putting their feet squarely in it? Well let’s not go into the religious permutations, which are a labyrinth and not good territory for a PR blog anyway. And let’s not probe the characters and personalities in question, as there has been enough analysis on that front in the media these past few days.

Instead, five ways in which the church could operate a far more effective press office:

1. Understand the audience. For the UK visit, the primary audience may well be practicing and non-practicing Catholics, but there are people of all faiths to consider, and those of no faith. I’m sure the Vatican has done some thorough scouring of the UK media ahead of its visit, but if so then the effects seem negligible so far – there seems to be scant appreciation of sentiment, at least if we’re to believe the pre-match media analysis.

2. Engage transparently. Far easier said than done for the Vatican, but some rudimentary acknowledgement of the issues surrounding the visit would doubtless reduce some of the tension and demonstrate that the church understands the community’s concerns. You might scoff at the thought of @Pope on Twitter, but I know of several priests that are using digital media to engage local communities and share their perspectives. Why not HQ?

3. Make enquiries easier. Of course, the Holy See could well see thousands of questions and information requests each day from around the world. And it’s a church, not a media-friendly business, so has its priorities. Even so, making enquiries – sensible, sound enquiries rather than muck-racking – of the Vatican as a member of the media is notoriously hard. The Catholic Church in England and Wales is better, but still very much like a 1990s press office – with a list of press announcements – rather than embracing the many ways of making contact and disseminating content that exist today.

4. Pre-publicity to warm up. While the media resources for the visit itself are impressive, with social media feeds, live streaming and comprehensive itinerary details, little seems to have been done over the past few months to counter the inevitable press rumblings about the cost of the visit, the issues that are sparking protests or the role of the church in UK society today. The latter point in particular had huge scope for editorial contribution, but the impression was that the press had to really dig for it, rather than it being a well served-up series of perspectives. Press were left to draw their own parallels with the only previous UK Papal visit in 1982.

5. Fundamentally, a press office rooted in two-way communication. The Vatican press office, with its newspaper, radio and TV services, has long been adept at pushing its views out. Enquiries coming the other way, though, are a different matter. It’s possible to make enquiries, but you get the impression that it’s far easier to approach the Catholic Communications Network in this country. Perhaps that’s deliberate.

6. Some command over what senior figures say. Again, easier said than done. But communications with communities of all faiths are vital for a modern church, and there seems to be a substantial need for a more co-ordinated and cohesive approach between headquarters and the ‘local office’ in the UK. The benefits of the best-delivered communications by local teams can be undone in an instant by an errant remark. The church needs a, or a better, policy on authorised spokespeople and their media contact.

Interestingly, there seems to have been a reasonably good search strategy for the visit. Despite the obvious competition from the amount of editorial that has and will be generated in the most popular UK media, a search for ‘Pope’s UK visit’ brings up The Papal Visit site as numbers two and three.

So this is guesswork, but as a casual observer of Catholic church media strengths and weaknesses my assumption is that London is getting far more media savvy, but Rome counters that by becoming a consistent source of faux pas.

September 14th, 2010 by Steve

Getting pitched/hitched on the quick

Recessions can bring with them strange behaviour for PR companies. But nothing is a greater hallmark of changed market conditions that the tortuously long or overcomplicated pitch process.

The stated intention may be to make absolutely sure that the client makes the right decision amidst intense competition and with lean budgets to spend. Normally though, it means nervousness surrounding the making of an agency appointment, or lack of experience in doing so, or both. Most agencies will have recent tales to share of prospects that’ve shortlisted 20 agencies (since when does 20 constitute a short list?!) to present credentials, will then pick half a dozen to pitch, two or three finalists, then one winner. And then take months sorting out contracts.

It makes the X Factor look like a walk in the park.

And it wastes so much time and money for all concerned.

So take heart from this joyful pitch tale from Speed HQ:
- Call came in from prospect seeking a very short credentials meeting the next day
- Meeting done, brief taken, pitch to be the following week
- Prepared in as much detail as possible given the time available
- Pitched. Won, decision made within three hours of pitches being finished
- Heads of terms and start work the next business day

Normally several weeks are needed to prepare the best possible response to a major brief. But if put under pressure you can still make a very good case and exercise commercial good sense for all concerned.

September 9th, 2010 by Steve

Police and journalists: thick as thieves?

Ouch.

Actually, this isn’t going to be a full-bore expose of how the law and the media in the UK are in league. Because I’m absolutely sure they aren’t.

But the News of the World phone “hacking” scandal that is doing the rounds at the moment, while raising some obvious and extremely serious issues, is perhaps not quite the revelation it at first appears. Journalists have long used some questionable methods for getting more information than their rivals and for breaking stories in the first place. Police have, in my experience, had either awareness or strong suspicion of some of these low-level techniques, but pursuing matters has never been in the public interest, it seems.

Plus I need to be careful not to say too much here, obviously. It’s not down to the police to decide what’s in the public interest of course. When I was in journalist, admittedly just for a few years in the early 1990s, the way the relationship between police and the media, albeit by journalists rather than coppers, work was referred to as ‘the game’.

Police knew or suspected that journalists would ‘cut corners’ to get stories. There was, with doubtless some technical exceptions but mostly in the case of fairly arcane or harmless laws, nothing illegal about that. Here are some examples:

The police frequency
How did journalists manage to turn up at crime scenes within minutes of an incident being called in, when they hadn’t yet been told about it in an hourly check-in call with police? A radio in the newsroom tuned to the police frequency perhaps? Naughty, but how many of us did that as a kid at home?

Arrested/questioned/charged
Technically, you are not able to reveal more than basic details about a suspect once they have been arrested and been questioned by police. Most media bend the law on this, and have done for years. Most media will not, though, go beyond those basic details once the accused has or have been charged with a crime. I can recall several occasions when, after hours of questioning, charges were conveniently made a few minutes after the paper had gone to press, enabling a fuller account of the allegations to be carried. This is not news; it is, or was, considered part of the fabric of journalism.

Pick you up, put you down
Like football managers, journalists ran stories to informal cycles of positive stories about the local police and then a bad article. Why? To keep everyone ‘honest’? Perhaps because they could. And journalists felt it in the public interest to keep police on their toes. It’s not for either party to decide what’s in the public interest. But this tended to be innocent stuff. ‘Police accused of picking on gypsies’ followed the next day by ‘Hero copper rescues albino cat from tree in gale’. Pretty tepid.

Lean on the junior bobby
Police press officers are pretty smart cookies. Young bobbies at the scene were easier to get to cough up information. A few seemingly harmless questions, a bit of flattery and ego massage and they may well let you through the police cordon to interview those on the inside or take pictures (some of which were too shocking or tasteless to be published anyway).

The socialising

This is not intended to conjure a vision of Gene Hunt, but press and police would often socialise in the past. It rarely happens these days, which is perhaps why – allegedly – some journalists have to use more strong-arm methods to get information. In the past, certainly in the pre-mobile phone era, police and hacks would sometimes meet for a few pints after work, and be on good personal terms. There’s nothing wrong with this, given the stress of the jobs and the unspoken feeling, particularly after major incidents, that they’re virtual colleagues. Providing they stick to the rules. But there will always be grey areas, voicemail access or no voicemail access.

So what of the current News of the World probe? Well, firstly the term hacking is not strictly accurate – if the accusation is that journalists guessed passwords to download voicemails, then surely the most likely primary charge to be brought would be theft? Though, as Guy Clapperton pointed out, no less a crime really.

Technicalities aside, there is more than one way to access phone conversations and messages. Guessing passwords is basic social engineering, but in the past if journalists had wanted to be naughty they’d have tried to get someone on the inside on-side. Perhaps that’s where the probe will prod next.

September 7th, 2010 by Steve

30 ways to survive and thrive in PR today

I’ve been inspired by Edelman’s Ben Cotton to share some stuff I talked (nicely) through internally recently. It’s a list of 10 things that PRs should do consistently for their three masters: clients, media/client audiences and their own bosses. Not because it will get them a job in the first place, but because it will help make their jobs sustainable and help their careers to progress faster.

These are a mixture of tips picked up over the years, others’ views and plain old fashioned personal whims, so please take them in the (helpful) spirit in which they’re intended. Some are a little contentious so do leave comments if you disagree.

Clients: being on the ball
1. Progress something for every client every day: proactivity is mandatory
2. Shield your arse in steel: document everything accurately
3. Determine your responsibilities and make a name for yourself with them
4. Call every client every day, and surprise them as well as satisfy them
5. Think about the ‘evidence’ of results: make it clear and compelling
6. Find out what matters to them about their job, then help them do it
7. Get intimate with their budget cycles and approvals
8. Become a known-name on the client side: web, email, verbal
9. Think about/develop plans before they ask you
10.You’re an adviser, so underline that: use words like ‘advice’ and ‘recommend’, and offer an alternative if you say no

Media: exploiting every opportunity
1. Listen to a radio news programme when you’re getting dressed
2. Read/listen to news on the way in to work: know three stories each day
3. Get yourself known by every core target journalist/blogger for your clients (max 25)
4. Read and exploit all the media/sections you’re targeting for your clients
5. Understand how journalists work and what they want
6. Learn to write like a journalist
7. Pitch your content in less than 25 words
8. Blog/tweet about media changes and interesting stories
9. Read/watch some media at the weekend, learn about a new one weekly
10.Get to grips with new techniques for evaluating publicity

And your employer: basic career development

1. Get in before your start time: not to be a slave, but to prepare
2. Do your timesheets on time
3. Look and act like you actually want to work there
4. Contribute your ideas and comments to discussions
5. Get to know people from across the industry
6. Check your email/voicemail when you’re out and take your mobile everywhere
7. Use your mouth (otherwise you’re just a person sat at a desk typing)
8. Do things before the deadline
9. Tell your line manager when you’ve done something towards your goals
10.Offer to take work off others if they’re struggling to get it done

I deliberately avoided spelling out conventional and social media references in the second section because it encompasses all media and applies equally to all kinds. And I didn’t want to make myself look like someone who thinks it’s big and clever to slip the words social and media into every bleedin’ sentence.

Equally, this is not particularly modern advice: most could have applied to PR jobs in 1990.

September 2nd, 2010 by Steve

The lost boys (and girls) final part: training not lip service

At the moment, there are two main problems with training people when they start their first PR agency job. One is that PR is modernising so quickly that it is a fast-moving feast – meaning the whole agency really needs constant training. The other is that most agencies have a long and undistinguished history of being pretty lacklustre about training people properly.

There I go again, wooden spoon in hand. But it’s true. Admit it. There are a few exceptions, many will say they have a structured training programme but they’re hardly comprehensive, while others do next-to sod all really.

The ability to turn entry-level people into really good PR people is not just a commercial priority, it’s something of a moral obligation too. Given these types of stories about exploitation of graduates by agencies, the industry is going to soil its own reputation if it can’t take a more responsible approach.

It’s blindingly obvious. Agencies are people businesses. Winning and retaining the best clients is linked closely with attracting and developing the best people. Inadequate training is bad for business and bad for the industry. And I’m sure the industry bodies would agree wholeheartedly with that.

So what should training for entry-level staff look like these days?

Well, first off in my experience the best training schemes recognise that the person starting their first PR job doesn’t just need skills and knowledge to enable them to do their initial jobs, but to equip them well for the rest of their careers. And to enable them to progress as fast as they’re able to. It’s not just a question of giving everyone a gun, boots and a tin hat and then sending them into combat. They need to understand how the machine works and what its aims are, and be exposed to some of the many subtleties that will determine success. Equally, they need to know what not to do if they want to keep themselves ‘alive’.

But the scope of training needs to be pretty broad. There needs to be sufficient time allowed to undertake it. It needs to be taken seriously, treated like another client essentially. And the individual needs to understand its purpose, rather than see the scheme as a series of disconnected chores.

Here are nine things I think entry-level training for PR agency jobs should encompass. Pace will depend on individuals and budgets of course, but this lot is all realistic – or should be – within the first year:

1. How to do the basics: most agencies seem to be reasonable good at ensuring people have some basic grasp of what the job entails and what it’s all about in order to get started. Of course they do – otherwise there’s a massive risk that someone will monumentally f*ck up something important. Learning on the job is vital, but equally there should be some structure behind what’s required to deliver all of the client work assigned, how best to manage time and how to undertake basic personal administration.

2. The money side: exposure to the fundamentals of how the agency makes money, banks and may lose money. The basics of risk and reward. But also some outline knowledge of how clients’ budgets work and how we help manage them (and what things tend to cost).

3. Keeping everyone happy: you have three masters – clients, the media and the person who pays your salary (the agency). You need help juggling their multiple wants and needs, all of which may suddenly turn without warning.

4. People development: OK, you’re on the bottom rung, but you need to know what the other rungs all look like and how others will help you to get up them. It’s part of their jobs too. Agencies should ensure their people are all clear on how they develop people, then come good on their promises. Few do. I am by no means perfect, but am doing all I can to be far better at it in future. Oh, and firms should have transparent salary scales, rather than trying to play mind games and fob people off with vaguaries.

5. Understanding the media and media change: yes read the media, but also understand how it works and how it is changing. Even ask senior people about media change at interview stage – if it’s clear they don’t understand it, it might not be an agency that offers you a long-term future.

6. The agency and its difference: most PR firms are pretty ropey at explaining how they’re different – because many of them AREN’T that different. But where points of real difference exist, everyone in the business should understand them, rather than relying on some mystic osmosis to enable people to find out.

7. How we do new business: I know some agencies don’t let junior people pitch, ever. It’s not always appropriate, as whatever is needed to win the pitch is the priority. But people should all be exposed to new business and be involved, in whatever way possible, in sales from day one. The best new business people of the future will be those who start early.

8. Legal/contractual obligations: well the contractual stuff can be tedious, but it’s the best way to understand what the agency has assured it will do and what the scope of the account is. Perhaps more important, though, is to understand the legal implications of PR work – media law, employment law, criminal law, copyright and so on. It amazes me that PRs are hired to represent brands to the outside world and yet so few get even the most rudimentary instruction of the legal risk of doing so and the potential consequence of their actions. If you don’t tell them, you’ve only got yourself to blame if the sky starts falling in.

9. English: the best saved ’til last. I wish it weren’t so, but far too many people coming into PR these days have poor spelling, a scant understanding of grammar and seem to have never received any instruction whatsoever on how to use the humble apostrophe. And don’t start me on incorrect use of plurals. So rather than moan about it, those who get it should help them. That is all.

Anyway, I hope these few posts have been in some way useful in setting out what PR firms should be doing, commercially and morally, to breed the best talent for tomorrow. And what people coming into the trade can do to increase their odds of landing the right job, and ask the right questions in doing so.

PR has largely been paying lip service to proper people development for too long. We need to improve, and the new generation trying to get a foot in the door is the best place to start. Before it becomes a lost generation.

September 1st, 2010 by Steve

Another blog post on the ASA news (and why it’s good for PR)

I woke this morning to details of the ASA’s tightening of the rules on its CAP code to cover digital media evolution. Since then many others have blogged about the intentions, the implications and the practicalities for brands using social media, and in particular for ‘modern’ PR. Meanwhile, I have been sat in meetings scoffing bagels, so am way off the pace.

So let’s get to it. Firstly, the ASA’s landmark agreement is a positive one overall for marketing in that it is an attempt to apply, broadly, the same principles to the online world as to conventional media. The devil will be in the detail and it’s right that far more clarity is needed on definitions, but for me today’s announcement does one thing that’s very helpful to PRs – underlines that there is a fundamental difference between editorial content and bought ‘promotion’ in social media.

Until now, with the ASA’s clout applied to making the distinction, the lines have been blurred. PR firms have touted campaigns that use social media which are, probably, encroaching on advertising. The ad agencies are certainly doing their utmost to encroach on PR – some even implying that PR is redundant where media reaches audiences directly. Social media agencies have exploited the jiggery-pokery by delivering campaigns that ignore those arguments and focus on reaching the right people using just social media. At least that’s what they’ll tell you.

With the ASA’s point – about editorial content being exempt from the legislation because doing so would impair freedom of speech – ringing in my ears, my thinking is that proper rules about how brands should conduct themselves in new media will be an asset to PR firms rather than a drag. We have enough on our plates trying to modernise to fit the needs of changing media without having to fight constant turf wars about where and how influence can fairly be exerted.

That said, where there are rules there are always those with an interest in challenging them, and it probably won’t be long before – unless clinically defined – the boundaries of what constitutes editorial will be tested. One thing is for sure: the ASA has its work cut out legislating for all of this, given the pace at which media is evolving.