<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Earlin&#039; PR abuse &#187; Digital Britain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/tag/digital-britain/feed/?12345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl</link>
	<description>Just another Speed Communications Blogs site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:16:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Embattled media, a political sledgehammer and still no real answers</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/04/16/embattled-media-a-political-sledgehammer-and-still-no-real-answers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/04/16/embattled-media-a-political-sledgehammer-and-still-no-real-answers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media consolidation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/04/16/embattled-media-a-political-sledgehammer-and-still-no-real-answers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Digital Britain, the Government&#8217;s plan for a media and communications uplift that will spur the economy, must first secure legislative changes to enable media consolidation, according to today&#8217;s Times. Would the Government look to sledgehammer legal tweaks through Parliament ahead of a General Election to increase voter favour? Surely not. Would media companies benefit from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digital Britain, the Government&#8217;s plan for a media and communications uplift that will spur the economy, must first secure legislative changes to enable media consolidation, according to today&#8217;s Times.</p>
<p>Would the Government look to sledgehammer legal tweaks through Parliament ahead of a General Election to increase voter favour? Surely not.</p>
<p>Would media companies benefit from all of this by being freer to use consolidation and restructuring to help them out of some very dark holes? Surely yes.</p>
<p>Could this lead the UK&#8217;s media into a panicked period of change that dilutes its standing, does not materially enhance content quality and does not tackle the fundamental challenge of digital media&#8217;s power? Draw your own conclusions.</p>
<p>I understand the shenanigans and the timing. What I still don&#8217;t understand is why media companies &#8211; in my experience run by some of the shrewdest businesspeople out there &#8211; don&#8217;t spend a lot more time getting digital properly under their wings and a lot less time asking others for help. Consolidation may be the only option for some, but modernisation has to be the watchword of the majority.<a href='http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article6101626.ece?&amp;EMC-Bltn=OLV9IA'>article6101626.ece?&amp;EMC-Bltn=OLV9IA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/earl/2009/04/16/embattled-media-a-political-sledgehammer-and-still-no-real-answers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.speedcommunications.com @ 2012-02-10 02:20:54 -->
