Visit speed website Earlin' PR abuse home
February 1st, 2012 by Steve

Do baldies give reputation extra shine?

I’ve long been a fan of Lucy Kellaway’s column but today’s piece on whether male executives should get hair transplants to extend their careers certainly bring matters to a head.

It’s a great article and made me chuckle enormously. Anything in the FT that mentions Wayne Rooney has comic potential. And it’s fair of me to do so - no I’m not bald as a coot, but as grey as a (greying) badger and have been heading that way since my early 30s.

But while Lucy gives a cutting assessment of the value of hair in senior career aspirations, there’s a PR point to this too – would having hair replacement treatment, or trying to deny the onset of baldness, have an impact on your brand’s reputation or your own personal reputation? Does being a baldie, a hair transplantee or a wiggy work against you in media interviews?

Well looks do play a major part in determing how someone is pereceived of course. But would someone who tried to cover themselves up look like they had something to hide? Would a silver fox like me appear to be past it? Does the insistence on keeping remaining hair as-is despite the rapid emergence of chrome dome glory smack of being ill-at-ease your own abilities?

Well there’s more to reputation than immediately meets the eye, but here are some hair tips for blokes in senior roles who have to face the media and their publics as brand ambassadors:

- If you’re going bald, shave it. It’ll show self-confidence

- If you’re going grey, get used to it. You might even look more experienced. Just go easy on the light clothing (particularly shirts) for TV, videos and pictures as you might look a bit like Fred in Scooby Doo

- If you’re not going bald or grey, try not to be too smug because the rest of us are. Equally, have answers prepared on whether you use dye

Bald can be commanding, authoritative and the basis of an aura. It’s part of you, it’s part of your reputation; revel in it.

August 23rd, 2011 by Steve

PRs: is Gaddafi’s guffing the tip of the interview iceberg?

PR people, be honest: we’ve all been there. We’ve all been in an interview with a spokesperson when either the journalist or, worse from our perspective, the spokesperson does something unspeakable. It might be that they snap and become aggressive, or it might be they choose that as the moment to display an offensive bodily habit.

Or in the case of low-lying Libyan ‘leader’ Col Gaddafi, they might spend the majority of their interview with veteran BBC journalist John Simpson farting like a trooper, prompting the Sunday Telegraph to run the majestic headline ‘Warm Wind Of Compromise Blows From Gaddafi’.

Hearing the story of Gaddafi’s guffing gaffe retold this morning, I started thinking about some of the ground-swallow-me-up-please interview situations I’ve been in. Both as a journalist, and on the other side of the fence as a PR. Here are a few that spring to mind:

- The bogeyman: a senior spokesperson who had a habit of picking (nay, boring) his nostrils in interviews, and occasionally feasting on the proceeds

- The even more senior spokesperson who fell asleep in the interview (note: jetlag is real, trying to be manly about it may not help)

- The perv who felt the need to comment on the bras of women he was talking to

- The guy who called the journalist the c-word after a particularly difficult question was raised

- The journalist (an urban legend this one, but I know it to be true) who vomitted in a bin at the beginning of the interview, brushed the incident off and asked the spokesman to carry on

- The quaker who stormed out of the room when he realised the Sunday newspaper journalist’s newspaper published on Sundays (yes, he had been briefed fully)

There are many more, some nefarious, some doubtless illegal in nature, some highly offensive, some just plain wierd.

The question is, when it comes to interviews made infamous by human behaviour, can anyone trump Gaddafi?

September 2nd, 2010 by Steve

The lost boys (and girls) final part: training not lip service

At the moment, there are two main problems with training people when they start their first PR agency job. One is that PR is modernising so quickly that it is a fast-moving feast – meaning the whole agency really needs constant training. The other is that most agencies have a long and undistinguished history of being pretty lacklustre about training people properly.

There I go again, wooden spoon in hand. But it’s true. Admit it. There are a few exceptions, many will say they have a structured training programme but they’re hardly comprehensive, while others do next-to sod all really.

The ability to turn entry-level people into really good PR people is not just a commercial priority, it’s something of a moral obligation too. Given these types of stories about exploitation of graduates by agencies, the industry is going to soil its own reputation if it can’t take a more responsible approach.

It’s blindingly obvious. Agencies are people businesses. Winning and retaining the best clients is linked closely with attracting and developing the best people. Inadequate training is bad for business and bad for the industry. And I’m sure the industry bodies would agree wholeheartedly with that.

So what should training for entry-level staff look like these days?

Well, first off in my experience the best training schemes recognise that the person starting their first PR job doesn’t just need skills and knowledge to enable them to do their initial jobs, but to equip them well for the rest of their careers. And to enable them to progress as fast as they’re able to. It’s not just a question of giving everyone a gun, boots and a tin hat and then sending them into combat. They need to understand how the machine works and what its aims are, and be exposed to some of the many subtleties that will determine success. Equally, they need to know what not to do if they want to keep themselves ‘alive’.

But the scope of training needs to be pretty broad. There needs to be sufficient time allowed to undertake it. It needs to be taken seriously, treated like another client essentially. And the individual needs to understand its purpose, rather than see the scheme as a series of disconnected chores.

Here are nine things I think entry-level training for PR agency jobs should encompass. Pace will depend on individuals and budgets of course, but this lot is all realistic – or should be – within the first year:

1. How to do the basics: most agencies seem to be reasonable good at ensuring people have some basic grasp of what the job entails and what it’s all about in order to get started. Of course they do – otherwise there’s a massive risk that someone will monumentally f*ck up something important. Learning on the job is vital, but equally there should be some structure behind what’s required to deliver all of the client work assigned, how best to manage time and how to undertake basic personal administration.

2. The money side: exposure to the fundamentals of how the agency makes money, banks and may lose money. The basics of risk and reward. But also some outline knowledge of how clients’ budgets work and how we help manage them (and what things tend to cost).

3. Keeping everyone happy: you have three masters – clients, the media and the person who pays your salary (the agency). You need help juggling their multiple wants and needs, all of which may suddenly turn without warning.

4. People development: OK, you’re on the bottom rung, but you need to know what the other rungs all look like and how others will help you to get up them. It’s part of their jobs too. Agencies should ensure their people are all clear on how they develop people, then come good on their promises. Few do. I am by no means perfect, but am doing all I can to be far better at it in future. Oh, and firms should have transparent salary scales, rather than trying to play mind games and fob people off with vaguaries.

5. Understanding the media and media change: yes read the media, but also understand how it works and how it is changing. Even ask senior people about media change at interview stage – if it’s clear they don’t understand it, it might not be an agency that offers you a long-term future.

6. The agency and its difference: most PR firms are pretty ropey at explaining how they’re different – because many of them AREN’T that different. But where points of real difference exist, everyone in the business should understand them, rather than relying on some mystic osmosis to enable people to find out.

7. How we do new business: I know some agencies don’t let junior people pitch, ever. It’s not always appropriate, as whatever is needed to win the pitch is the priority. But people should all be exposed to new business and be involved, in whatever way possible, in sales from day one. The best new business people of the future will be those who start early.

8. Legal/contractual obligations: well the contractual stuff can be tedious, but it’s the best way to understand what the agency has assured it will do and what the scope of the account is. Perhaps more important, though, is to understand the legal implications of PR work – media law, employment law, criminal law, copyright and so on. It amazes me that PRs are hired to represent brands to the outside world and yet so few get even the most rudimentary instruction of the legal risk of doing so and the potential consequence of their actions. If you don’t tell them, you’ve only got yourself to blame if the sky starts falling in.

9. English: the best saved ’til last. I wish it weren’t so, but far too many people coming into PR these days have poor spelling, a scant understanding of grammar and seem to have never received any instruction whatsoever on how to use the humble apostrophe. And don’t start me on incorrect use of plurals. So rather than moan about it, those who get it should help them. That is all.

Anyway, I hope these few posts have been in some way useful in setting out what PR firms should be doing, commercially and morally, to breed the best talent for tomorrow. And what people coming into the trade can do to increase their odds of landing the right job, and ask the right questions in doing so.

PR has largely been paying lip service to proper people development for too long. We need to improve, and the new generation trying to get a foot in the door is the best place to start. Before it becomes a lost generation.

August 31st, 2010 by Steve

The lost boys (and girls) part three: how to land that first PR job

Shame on me. I said I’d write this last Friday. I have a valid excuse, but won’t bore you with it.

So if PR agencies should be more optimistic and assertive in hiring entry-level staff at the moment, are there staff out there who’re worth hiring?

That seems like a stupid question. Surely the backlog of graduates with PR, marketing and journalism qualifications, or other degrees, or no degrees but bags of ambition, is such that competition is rife and agencies can pick from the very cream of the crop?

It’s partly true. Agencies that I know of have certainly got more applicants for entry-level positions than they’ve had for a long time. But if my own experience of the past few years is anything to go by, the vast majority of applications are, in the main, utter shite.

I would say this. I’m a pedant. I am by no means perfect, but equally I can normally spot an incorrectly italicised bulletpoint at 50 paces. Fundamentally, if people care about their jobs and their careers, they will care about the quality of their work, always. Mediocrity is not my friend.

Even so, by more watered-down standards, the quality of approaches made by many entry-level applicants to PR agencies in the midst of a gruelling recession is shocking. Not just what they write, but what they say and how they act. All-too-often, applications are insipid, errors are rife, and both personality and ambition are conspicuous by their absence. Harsh, but in my view true.

There is no magic formula for landing the first job in PR and getting a foot on the career ladder. Equally – and this is intended to be helpful to genuinely keen, intelligent and media-thirsty people out there – there are a few basics that will help your application stand out, so that you’ve impressed from your very first contact:

1. Don’t make spelling errors. This is blindingly obvious. There is a thing called a dictionary. Use it. Prove you can at least both read and type.

2. Communicate your difference. You are applying for a communications job. You aren’t expected to be the world’s best communicator, but equally you need to pinpoint concisely why you should be considered.

3. Don’t bullshit (but if you have to, make it exceedingly good bullshit). If you try to over-egg your achievements and experience, it will be spotted. We spend all day doing this stuff. Equally, pure cheek will at least raise a grin and may get you a foot in the door.

4. Personalise properly. Don’t send blanket emails. Spend the time approaching each firm individually. Call up if you like – few people do this these days, and it may show you have balls.

5. Don’t kiss the agency’s arse. Anything banging on about why you approached this agency because you ‘know’ how great it is will probably be scoffed at. If you do think you’d be suited because of what makes that agency different, say so – but play it straight and ease up on the praise.

6. Don’t focus exclusively on your academic achievements. Yes a PR degree can be useful, but it is no substitute for real-world experience (academia: queue here to take issue with this point). Same goes for other degrees. You will learn harsher lessons about PR in your first months on the job than you ever dreamed of as a student – show that you acknowledge that.

7. Think about the email title. ‘CV for consideration’ won’t make you stand out. ‘Busty blonde seeks PR job’ will, but for the wrong reasons. Be smart and you stand a better chance.

8. If you’ve done work experience with PR firms, explain what you learned and how it improved your skills. Don’t just say you worked somewhere from one date to another. Surviving a few weeks of photocopying and donkey work does not an account executive make.

9. Develop a digital profile and use it to flaunt your wares. Wadds has already imparted wisdom upon this topic. One of the first things a prospective employer is likely to do is Google you. Exploit that, and keep the private life private too.

10. Show your enthusiasm for the job on offer. The three essential ingredients of a good PR are intelligence, real passion for the media and hard work. We can spot the former, while the latter is to be proven down the line and by others’ comments. The middle part is up to you to show the agency when you make the approach and, if you get one, at the interview.

Tomorrow’s concluding part: what to look for in an agency’s approach to training.

April 8th, 2010 by Steve

Nailing your interview

I was chatting with a recruiter this morning and they said that jobs in PR are on the up (good) but that feedback they’re getting is that interview skills are woeful (er, not so good). Interesting and it’s not the first time in the last couple of months that this has been mentioned to me. One recruiter is even thinking of making interview skills training part of the service they offer candidates.

I have a couple of theories as to why interview skills aren’t up to scratch. First up is social media. Are we hiding behind Facebook, Twitter etc and loosing the art of conversation? Second, us Brits are well known for being self depreciating but are we taking this too far?

I interview most people who apply to Speed and have some top tips for all of you job hunting at the minute:

1. Limp handshakes are a no, no – man up people
2. Be on time (might seem obvious, but you’d be surprised…)
3. Look on the website and do your homework (‘ Do you have a blog?’ ‘Er, I don’t know what clients you work for’…. grrrr)
4. Answer the question (you’re not a politician)
5. Have plenty of examples. If you tell me you’re good at newjacking, be able to show case your talents

Deciding to find a new job is a big decision, don’t shoot yourself in the foot.

February 15th, 2010 by Steve

10 things not to say in a PR job interview

First, a disclaimer: Speed has been interviewing recently so has seen quite a few prospective recruits, and these comments are not specifically about any of those interviews.

Apart from the one that was quite weird, but that is probably obvious.

So seeing the comments of senior journalists this morning on what they look for when hiring reporters, I thought about how that compares with PR interviews.

I’m planning another blog post this week about PR salaries and career progression within agencies, so this is perhaps a good prequel.

Things not to say when being interviewed for a job at a PR agency:

1. I really like the thought of working in PR

2. I know quite a few people who work in PR and am really into reading the media, so I think it’s something I’d like to pursue

3. They’ve piled me up with so much work that I don’t think I can keep working there so I need to go elsewhere where I can do less work (yes, have had this one more than once)

4. I don’t really do anything outside work

5. I don’t really read the newspapers, I get all my information from social media

6. Really sorry I’m late, I misjudged how long the journey would take me

7. If I joined here, how quickly would I be promoted to account manager (fine to discuss, but not in this presumptuous way without any discussion of why you might be capable)?

8. What do you think my best qualities are?

9. With the ways things are today, I don’t think grammar and proper English really have a role anymore

10. Do you have a blog?

April 30th, 2009 by Steve

Top 10 questions to ask in a PR interview

I was having a frank chat with a PR agency MD recently about how too many agencies hire lightweight people during boom years because they’re desperate for staff and cut corners at the interview stage. Harsh but, in my view, often true.

We got on to talking about what questions should be asked, and which agencies are infamous for asking oddball questions (like the biscuit one: you know who you are). And which questions really help to weed out the warblers in PR.

So here are my favourite 10 interview questions that agencies should be asking potential recruits when hiring in a recession, if indeed hiring in a recession becomes feasible, to help sort the wheat from the chaff:

1. Is this just about money?

2. Tell me about three stories in the news that caught your eye today.

3. If you had your own agency, what would it be like?

4. What do you like to cook (yes, this is wierd, yes I have a habit of asking it)?

5. Why is it that you think you’re good at your job?

6. You’re editing the evening news: PM to resign in scandal or tragedy leaves hundreds dead, which story do you run first?

7. What do your colleagues dislike about working with you?

8. Good grammar and attention to detail. Discuss.

9. How will agencies be selling PR services in years to come?

10. Define irony (this is my personal favourite).