Visit speed website Earlin' PR abuse home
February 1st, 2012 by Steve

#speedvideo challenge: and the winner is..

Today two teams from Speed locked horns in a challenge to see what they could learn about producing strong videos to bolster PR programmes. Before lunch.

Like many of our training initiatives, the #speedvideo challenge was speedlearning – some instructions, some theory, and then put it into practice, with a prize for the winning team. The three-minute videos were then edited, formatted and finalised by our video partner Blueprint TV (thanks again guys for giving up your time to help with this).

The judges considered communication clarity, interest level for the target audience and strength of delivery of the message that video/SEO are now core components of expansive, true public relations, as opposed to a restrictive media relations-only approach.

Without further ado, the winning team was Cakie (sorry, Katie) Swan’s, which served up a recipe for perfectly-baked SEO in PR.

A close runner-up, by a mere point, was Lisa Corbridge’s team for a video about the fundamentals of video in PR.

Well done both teams, amazing what you can achieve under a tight deadline pressure with a camera, light, microphone and large bag of Sainsbury’s plain white flour.

February 1st, 2012 by Steve

Video thrilled the racy PR

It’s strange. There is so much talk in PR circles these days about the value of videos for developing reputation, yet only a relatively small number of PRs know how to make them well and make them part of their ongoing work for clients.

Videos have had valuable since their infancy, but in the past couple of years agencies really seemed to have cottoned on to their value in explaining things, relaying stories, interesting the audience and stirring word-of-mouth.

Yet most agencies don’t really understand how to do videos well. Some agencies have restructured to develop expertise in content creation, which might help them but doesn’t always help clients looking for PR people to counsel them about more than content. That’s another discussion altogether though.

We’ve done lots of videos at Speed, but thought we can always improve skills throughout the team in applying a brand’s narrative to video, ensuring clarity of communication and apply understanding to make the content really potent. There are also lots of practical tips to consider too.

So we’re doing a Speed Video training morning today and have set two teams of all-rounder PRs a challenge: make the best video you can by lunchtime. The one that is clearest, most compelling and best tells the story of where Speed is heading as a business wins a prize. A very PR-ish prize. Being racy might help too, but let’s keep it decent.

The teams are hard at it at the moment. One video will be on the planning of editorial content for SEO, the other one best practice in using videos in PR campaigns. They’ve done their homework. Some people have brought props. Creative process PR rooted in audience nous has clearly been undertaken, rather than just one of those wafty PR brains storms that start with “what shall we do then?”

 Quite what they’re doing though, no-one is sure. Overheard in one plotting meeting:

“Sarah is going to roll, I’m going to sprinkle and then we need to work out what to do with the flour.”

And in another, awash for fluorescent sticky notes: “As cheesy as it is, it does make for a good link. I’ll just have to gaze into your eyes as I talk about rich media.”

Stay tuned for the results later.

January 6th, 2012 by Steve

Heart-warming tale to end the week

This is an email I received from another PR (name removed to conceal identity and avoid blushes):

“Hi Steve

I hope this email finds you well.  I am emailing you about your blog on the 19th December in PR Week ‘PR’s New Years Resolution Should Be Labour Honesty’, and due to it being a subject of great relevance to me at the moment I felt compelled to email you.  I am one of those would be Account Execs that you mention in the blog, not being paid to do what seems like a great deal and while I cannot deny that gaining coverage worth a good deal of money but not getting any in return is unfair, my issue is not so much with internships themselves but the myths surrounding them.  I have applied and had many interviews for Graduate Entry Roles, where it appears that my experience and achievements (although modest) have counted for very little or alternatively have not been enough, which does give off a somewhat confusing message.  It seems to me the real issue with internships is not then internships themselves but the fact that they either not important and ‘unnecessary’ for entry level roles or I am expected to have had at least 6 month intern experience, that to me seems completely absurd.  On one level PR wannabe’s are expected to work for nothing as otherwise they have no hope of a job but on another certain agencies advertise as ‘experience not mandatory’, begging the question what is the point?  In our current society, expecting any sort of ethical behaviour in the work place only serves to leave you disappointed and I am aware that the Managing Partners of my agency do not bat an eyelid at exploiting me, however i feel that I am left with very little choice, what are my realistic alternatives when the current job market is so tough?  The reality is I, like many others of my circumstance have a passion for PR but are struggling to find a job, and the truth is I would rather do my unpaid internship than not be involved in PR at all and if I make a stand there will be another hopeful to fill my place.  Graduates desiring a career in PR are stuck between a rock and a hard place, with no guarantee of your sacrifice resulting in a job. 

While I agree with the principles of your blog, I do not think it is realistic to expect companies to stop using unpaid internships, what I believe could improve the situation is companies being clearer about what experience you need for a job and the likelihood of obtaining a job out of their internship or even better if companies would be prepared to take a risk on young graduates, who if nurtured and guided might show they are worthy of a pay cheque at the end.

I on behalf of all graduates in my position, also want to say how refreshing it is to see a successful PR professional standing up for interns, and addressing how much they do contribute, you are it seems in a minority but I still felt the urge to thank you for at least suggesting we should be treated differently.

Best Wishes

<NAME>”

November 25th, 2011 by Steve

Speed Battle of the Sexes Challenge: the plot thickens

Today is Speed’s Battle of the Sexes Challenge.

There was only one rule, we said: in your bid to develop the most search-optimised blog content by 6pm today, you must hold your planning meeting in the morning at a spa.

But the planning and the plotting started early. Discussion around the Speed hotel bar in Budapest last night centred on how the girls had devised a cunning scheme for pleading for backlinks from media contacts, family, friends and any passers-by they could lay their hands on. Relying on their contacts rather than their content it seems (how very old school). The boys had already talked, of course, but are waiting for the spa chat before formalising plans, in the spirit of fairness.

In fact, we have something of a head-start in that our Dan Howe has already stuck up a quick video of his reverse strip tease to beat airline carry-on baggage limits. It’s currently ranked sixth for searches under Speed Budapest.

Now to breakfast, and the spa. And victory, hopefully.

November 23rd, 2011 by Steve

Speed’s steamy Battle of the Sexes

We’ve done some innovative training in our time. At Speed we like to get people to roll up their sleeves, apply what they’re learning about immediately and challenge themselves to do things in new ways.

Our Digital Apprentice saw all our staff challenged to do public relations differently using only digital media, enabling us to apply techniques that hadn’t previously been possible. The Speed Creative Apprentice took things further by applying brainpower to creating influence through all the media at our disposal: conventional, social and branded.

This Friday we’re going much further. Across the Channel and the mighty Alps to eastern Europe. In our trunks and cossies.

Speed’s annual company planning meeting will take place on Friday in Budapest, Hungary. After that all our staff will take part in our Battle of the Sexes Challenge – a one-day bid to test our search planning capabilities in delivering influence through public relations.

The brief is simple: there are two teams – the girls and the boys. During the day they must create blog content in such a way that it appears as high up the rankings for Google searches for ‘Speed Budapest’ as possible. Whichever team has the highest-ranked content by 6pm wins.

It’s clearly an unrealistic challenge given that it’s a brief we’re highly unlikely to ever receive from a client. But it will get people to show their mettle in understanding how search works, how to factor it into the planning of editorial content, how to publicise that content and how to achieve the best possible results against the clock.

It will take detailed planning, precise execution, close teamworking and intricate project management.

Which is why there is only one rule: each team must hold a (separate) project planning meeting on Friday morning in one of Budapest’s many thermal spas. We did say we do training differently.

Follow our progress on this blog or other Speed blogs. Or better still, just search for it. Speed Budapest, Speed Budapest, Speed Budapest, Speed Budapest, Speed Budapest, Speed Budapest, Speed Budapest, Speed Budapest, Speed Budapest, Speed Budapest…

April 1st, 2011 by Steve

Speed’s Creative Apprentice: and the winner is..

Speed did a Creative Apprentice workshop this morning. Thank you again to clients, the media, our staff and colleagues across the Loewy group for supporting us in making this possible.

Without further ado, the winning team was team 2:  Mike Frier, Becca Daniel, Neil Robertson, Ruth Jones, Sarah Apps, Nichola Wheatley and Scott McLean. The team wins a bar tab, not that it needs it after some of the sore heads that rolled in at dawn this morning.

But the overall winner for outstanding creativity and practical approaches to delivering commercial returns is Chrissie McGoldrick. Well done Chrissie, the Kindle is yours.

So what should our next apprentice session be? I quite fancy a Grammar Apprenctice myself.

November 24th, 2010 by Steve

Speed’s Digital Apprentice: the bath is ready

Speed’s Digital Apprentice training day happens next Thursday. Another training day? At such a busy time of the year? Yet another flimsy course during which supposed gurus will sound off and try to make social media sound deliberately complicated?

Not a bit of it

We’re going to be getting all the staff at Speed wet – everyone will be bathing in digital media. It is not optional. And we’re turning off the phones and email to ensure that it is so.

This idea has struck a chord with many we’ve spoken to about it. Clients, journalists, peers, in fact anyone who’ll listen.

This is what we’re going to be doing:

8.30am, training day begins (Speed offices, Leicester Square)

8.45am, the first of four short talks from external experts: pushing the frontiers of online video, making search an integral part of communications planning, how journalism is responding to media change, and the digitisation/socialisation of radio and TV

10am, the morning challenge.  Nine teams, each assigned a ‘dream’ client, each has the same challenge – work out how you could make 1,000 (consumer) or 100 (B2B) more people want to buy this brand’s wares by sundown. Produce one piece of content you would need to do it. There are three hours to work together on this. Choose a pretend client from a major retailer, mobile phone manufacturer, university, magazine publisher, software company or food brand (we have the actual names, but are keeping them private until the day). Then each team will present it back to the rest of the company in five minute slots

1pm, presentations from the morning challenge, then lunch and brief talk by Francis Ingham, chief executive of the PRCA

2pm, the afternoon challenge. Same nine teams, each given a challenge to get more than 100 audience interactions from an editorial campaign about Speed/PR by 5pm. Pick a tool with which to achieve this from this list: a viral video, blog post, hashtag, picture, conventional press article, or a radio/audio item

5pm, teams present their results back. One overall Digital Apprentice winner is picked from across the company, and wins an iPad

5.30pm, champagne, heckling, pub

Follow #digitalapprentice or the blogs on our web site for more. It will be covered throughout the day, followed by pithy post-match analysis.

October 7th, 2010 by Steve

Grad to be here. Where’s the photocopier?

I never bet. But if I did, a good punt might be that graduate recruitment has not appeared on board meeting agendas at most PR companies in the past year.

I’ve written before about the difficulties of getting a first job in PR at the moment, why many agencies have what amounts to a hiring freeze and why agencies should be bolder in looking to the future. Most of which is pretty obvious.

One part of all of that was the issue of graduate recruitment schemes, and what agencies should look to do in order to turn people into competent PRs, starting the day they join. Training is obviously an important facet, but it does not begin and end there.

Why am I regurgitating this? Well, at Speed’s last board meeting there was – shock – an item about graduate recruitment. Not because we didn’t have much else to talk about, but because we’re serious about attracting a high-calibre graduate intake and taking a responsible, sustainable approach to developing their skills. And not just graduates, but people with the right skills and experience who want to get into the fast-modernising PR trade. I didn’t go to university myself, so that’s a topic close to my heart.

What should a good graduate recruitment programme look like? Without giving away too much on the Speed approach, which we’ll be unveiling in the coming weeks, it should cover:

- Close links with universities and training courses so that students know what may lie ahead (and we can bag the best ones early). Not just PR courses, but marketing, journalism and broader media courses. Not the crap ones though

- Clear and written commitments to potential recruits about what they’re getting into, what the employer will provide and, equally, what the employer won’t do. Plus, crucially, what the employee will be expected to do to develop themselves and build a successful career quickly. This is critical in sorting the ambitious, industrious and intelligent from the lethargic, confused and under-equipped. And you can quote me on that

- A reasonable model and timeframe for making the transition from assistant in the background to consultant in the foreground. There will always be shades of grey. Yet if a person will never meet a client for six months so that when they do they are ready (think about how the likes of Beckham, Scholes and Giggs were introduced to the first team of the three-time European champions) then be straight with them about that. There is a lot less photocopying than there used to be in this job, but there will always be grunt work to do as new recruits gain a 360 degree view of the job

- Details of salary bands and what is required in order to make progress through them. Agencies fudge salary expectations at graduate intake level more than with any other level of employee – largely because the rest of us have got wise to it. Be clear and honest and it will help you attract clear, strong and honest candidates who respect you. Providing you don’t pay peanuts obviously

- Above all, complete and utter honesty. Do you risk creating a bad first impression with a client if you wear something a bit weird to your first meeting? What’s the best way to make a name for yourself with colleagues without becoming infamous for the wrong reasons? How do you show a client that you know your stuff from the off? All questions the graduates will come across, and all things that their colleagues can help with. Graduate schemes need to have the commitment and the involvement of everyone in the company, both to give the new intake the best possible start and ensure that they become colleagues that everyone can rely on

- Grammar, spelling, timesheets, quality (*slaps wrist*)

More on SpeedGrads soon. And some memories on my start in PR, which might prompt a few tears and a few wry smiles.

By the way, want a career in PR? Leave a comment below or track me down elsewhere if so.

September 2nd, 2010 by Steve

The lost boys (and girls) final part: training not lip service

At the moment, there are two main problems with training people when they start their first PR agency job. One is that PR is modernising so quickly that it is a fast-moving feast – meaning the whole agency really needs constant training. The other is that most agencies have a long and undistinguished history of being pretty lacklustre about training people properly.

There I go again, wooden spoon in hand. But it’s true. Admit it. There are a few exceptions, many will say they have a structured training programme but they’re hardly comprehensive, while others do next-to sod all really.

The ability to turn entry-level people into really good PR people is not just a commercial priority, it’s something of a moral obligation too. Given these types of stories about exploitation of graduates by agencies, the industry is going to soil its own reputation if it can’t take a more responsible approach.

It’s blindingly obvious. Agencies are people businesses. Winning and retaining the best clients is linked closely with attracting and developing the best people. Inadequate training is bad for business and bad for the industry. And I’m sure the industry bodies would agree wholeheartedly with that.

So what should training for entry-level staff look like these days?

Well, first off in my experience the best training schemes recognise that the person starting their first PR job doesn’t just need skills and knowledge to enable them to do their initial jobs, but to equip them well for the rest of their careers. And to enable them to progress as fast as they’re able to. It’s not just a question of giving everyone a gun, boots and a tin hat and then sending them into combat. They need to understand how the machine works and what its aims are, and be exposed to some of the many subtleties that will determine success. Equally, they need to know what not to do if they want to keep themselves ‘alive’.

But the scope of training needs to be pretty broad. There needs to be sufficient time allowed to undertake it. It needs to be taken seriously, treated like another client essentially. And the individual needs to understand its purpose, rather than see the scheme as a series of disconnected chores.

Here are nine things I think entry-level training for PR agency jobs should encompass. Pace will depend on individuals and budgets of course, but this lot is all realistic – or should be – within the first year:

1. How to do the basics: most agencies seem to be reasonable good at ensuring people have some basic grasp of what the job entails and what it’s all about in order to get started. Of course they do – otherwise there’s a massive risk that someone will monumentally f*ck up something important. Learning on the job is vital, but equally there should be some structure behind what’s required to deliver all of the client work assigned, how best to manage time and how to undertake basic personal administration.

2. The money side: exposure to the fundamentals of how the agency makes money, banks and may lose money. The basics of risk and reward. But also some outline knowledge of how clients’ budgets work and how we help manage them (and what things tend to cost).

3. Keeping everyone happy: you have three masters – clients, the media and the person who pays your salary (the agency). You need help juggling their multiple wants and needs, all of which may suddenly turn without warning.

4. People development: OK, you’re on the bottom rung, but you need to know what the other rungs all look like and how others will help you to get up them. It’s part of their jobs too. Agencies should ensure their people are all clear on how they develop people, then come good on their promises. Few do. I am by no means perfect, but am doing all I can to be far better at it in future. Oh, and firms should have transparent salary scales, rather than trying to play mind games and fob people off with vaguaries.

5. Understanding the media and media change: yes read the media, but also understand how it works and how it is changing. Even ask senior people about media change at interview stage – if it’s clear they don’t understand it, it might not be an agency that offers you a long-term future.

6. The agency and its difference: most PR firms are pretty ropey at explaining how they’re different – because many of them AREN’T that different. But where points of real difference exist, everyone in the business should understand them, rather than relying on some mystic osmosis to enable people to find out.

7. How we do new business: I know some agencies don’t let junior people pitch, ever. It’s not always appropriate, as whatever is needed to win the pitch is the priority. But people should all be exposed to new business and be involved, in whatever way possible, in sales from day one. The best new business people of the future will be those who start early.

8. Legal/contractual obligations: well the contractual stuff can be tedious, but it’s the best way to understand what the agency has assured it will do and what the scope of the account is. Perhaps more important, though, is to understand the legal implications of PR work – media law, employment law, criminal law, copyright and so on. It amazes me that PRs are hired to represent brands to the outside world and yet so few get even the most rudimentary instruction of the legal risk of doing so and the potential consequence of their actions. If you don’t tell them, you’ve only got yourself to blame if the sky starts falling in.

9. English: the best saved ’til last. I wish it weren’t so, but far too many people coming into PR these days have poor spelling, a scant understanding of grammar and seem to have never received any instruction whatsoever on how to use the humble apostrophe. And don’t start me on incorrect use of plurals. So rather than moan about it, those who get it should help them. That is all.

Anyway, I hope these few posts have been in some way useful in setting out what PR firms should be doing, commercially and morally, to breed the best talent for tomorrow. And what people coming into the trade can do to increase their odds of landing the right job, and ask the right questions in doing so.

PR has largely been paying lip service to proper people development for too long. We need to improve, and the new generation trying to get a foot in the door is the best place to start. Before it becomes a lost generation.

August 26th, 2010 by Steve

The lost boys (and girls) part two: can agencies afford to hire them?

Yesterday I tried to set the scene about the challenges the PR industry and graduates are facing at the moment over entry-level positions – boiling it down to something like agencies need to sort themselves out and the best grads should retain hope.

Most people who make the hiring decisions about entry-level staff at PR agencies have empathy with those who want to get a job at the moment but can’t. Some aren’t hiring because they don’t need the extra staff or can’t justify being over-capacity. Others will say they simply don’t have the time to invest in training entry-level recruits. Then there’s the tendency to get freelance support in rather than make permanent hires. It all comes down to a combination of cost and risk.

And rightly so. Now is certainly not the time for any PR agency, however well it may be doing, to throw caution to the wind and hire way ahead of need.

But my main point here is that skilled people are the absolute bedrock of a PR agency’s success, and a two-year hiatus in the intake of entry-level personnel combined with lack of proper training for the future will not only damage graduates’ career prospects but the PR industry.

Yes of course the focus at the moment must be on delivering great client work, attracting clients and producing the best financial results possible in the circumstances, but without a commercially mature and systematic approach to developing people, things will eventually start to unravel. Note that I said approach, not necessarily investment.

Can agencies afford to hire people? Well, only they will know. But in the recent boom years many took on ‘hot’ graduates without even thinking about what use they could be put to. Competition to hire them was fierce. Now there are things like hiring freezes and freelance-only mandates, which may actually cost agencies more in lost business opportunities or higher costs.

Some agencies are continuing to operate graduate recruitment schemes and have simply scaled back on the volume in the past couple of years. Good on them. But many seem to have mothballed everything.

Even if an agency cannot financially justify taking on any extra staff at the moment, here are the things I think all should be thinking about in this area, rather than burying their heads in the sand:

1. Make entry-level recruitment a commercial priority now.
If you can’t recruit at entry-level, have a plan for doing so. Build a pipeline of people you may want to hire in the future and those who – without making false promises – you may be able to hire should circumstances suddenly change. Make this something that everyone in the company is committed to and understands. It will mean you have a broader pick of talent should you need to, the ability to hire quickly and directly, and there is enormous benefit in your current staff understanding that you are being responsible about entry-level positions so that they’re being challenged to develop rather than stagnate.

2. Upgrade the approach to entry-level training.
So many PR firms pay lip service to training. Or talk about how much they spend on it, or how much of an individual’s time is ring-fenced for it. Training is not a line item in a budget or a headline statistic – it must be systemic, part of the fabric of the business. People must want to learn, people must want to teach them and everyone must understand what the purpose of it is. The raft of informal training initiatives run by the CIPR and PRCA shows that individuals have appetites to learn even in a recession – in many cases, recession pressures make it more of a priority.

Agencies need clear, comprehensive and realistic training programmes for all staff but with specific tracks for entry-level people. In my view, the scope should include the broadest reach of conventional and digital PR, and open their eyes to how PR’s ‘editorial world’ may develop in the future. Training must move from an afterthought to being the client delivery and client development backbone of the business. Budget for external support will inevitable be thin or non-existent, but existing staff can teach them a lot of it providing adequate time is set aside. There are mountains of time squandered each month at most PR firms through not charging clients properly for work undertaken, inaccurate time reporting and constant griping about colleagues not being able to complete tasks properly (normally because they haven’t been taught properly…). So it should be straightforward and wholly commercially feasible to commit regular time to training, for everyone’s benefit

3. Be clear with potential recruits about what you’re seeking.
Graduates get the run-around from PR firms far too often. PR needs the best talent coming in to take entry-level jobs. PR will increasingly have to compete with other areas of the marketing for talent, particularly as digitisation means PR is having to redefine what it is and how it generates value. So agencies needs to explain and market their entry-level training and development ethos clearly. They must show how working with them is different. They must be clear about what to expect from their careers in the initial months and and years. They should, ideally, be open about salary scales. Most of all though, be clear about what clients you’d like them to work for and what they’ll be doing. Too often, potentially brilliant graduates wither on the vine or move jobs too soon simply because they were oversold on the excitement of the work or the opportunities they’d be given. Equally, recruits need to be honest about what they’re good at, bad at and ideally seeking rather than trying to talk their way through the hiring process just to land a job, no matter how scarce those are

Tomorrow, what the (potentially) lost generation of PR applicants should be doing to land the right job. Not just the interview, but the lock, stock and barrel.