January 15th, 2010 by Louise Mackintosh

Jesus in my pint

Anyone who has ever worked with me will now groan (or cheer) with recognition of my pet subject, but I personally cannot believe I have only ever made passing reference to this in previous blogs:

The faces of famous people appearing in inanimate objects.

I am quite obsessed.

Really. Ask me’colleagues – old and new – and they will tell you how I brief them to hunt examples down for my ever-growing collection of what I consider to be coverage nirvana.  This week, to give you a recent example, an old colleague of mine tweeted me about the appearance of Jesus in a naan bread in Monday’s Express. I was actually off sick that day but made damn sure I hunted the paper out in our office the following day. And low, it was well worth the effort:

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/150952/Jesus-of-Naan-zareth/

Just genius.

Why such stories delight me so much I am unsure, but suffice to say that I would retire on the spot if ever a client were to let me produce one for PR purposes.  I have had a couple of very near misses. In my first job I was privy to a colleague suggesting ‘Jesus in my pint’ to the Guinness client and later I very nearly swung ‘David Beckham in my ready meal’… but both were a case of close, but no cigar.

Gutted.

Over the years I have collected all manner of examples: Osama Bin Laden in my cloud, The Madonna and Child in my water stain, Mother Teresa in my bath bun, God in my cat fur… I could go on.  And do you know what – if ever a subject was guaranteed to appear in the paper, this is it. It’s not big and it’s not clever, but it is universally appealing… and fun. Maybe we could learn from this in terms of story development, particularly for the tabloids – keep it simple and make people smile. Not a bad rule to follow if you ask me.

As for my collection, I am planning to use it to create a montage for my downstairs loo… in case you were wondering.

emailSave to del.icio.usAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
January 7th, 2010 by Louise Mackintosh

Mr Motivator

…Who needs him? What with all the New Year reminders that fat is evil.

Take the hilarious story about a health club in Bristol which took it upon themselves to point out in an ad that
“WhGym Alien Warningen the aliens come, they will eat the fatties first”

Needless to say, the locals were far from impressed.

And earlier in the week, a story so bad that I am in two minds as to whether it was born from mind-blowing stupidity or mind-blowing genius:  dating site BeautifulPeople.com – which only allows new members to join if existing members deem them to be good looking enough – has axed 5,000 members for having posted photos of themselves showing weight gain.

And the official company quote?

As a business, we mourn the loss of any member, but the fact remains that our members demand the high standard of beauty be upheld,” said site founder Robert Hintze. “Letting fatties roam the site is a direct threat to our business model and the very concept for which BeautifulPeople.com was founded.”

Yes, you did read that right. “Letting fatties roam free”.  Somebody approved that.

I don’t know whether to be appalled or impressed, I really don’t.

 

emailSave to del.icio.usAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
December 9th, 2009 by Louise Mackintosh

Missing a trick

A piece of research undertaken by New Media Age highlights just how many major brands are failing to embrace Twitter and use it to help manage their reputation:

The research analysed the Twitter activity of the 500 brands in the 2009/10 Superbrands list during the week of 19 November 2009. It revealed 74% had no presence at all on the micro-blogging site.

On Twitter, daily updates are considered a standard. But according to the survey, of the 130 Superbrands with a presence on Twitter, just 50 used the site daily. A further 54 had tweeted once a week. However, 29 were tweeting once an hour or more.

Those sites mentioned tweeting daily, even hourly, are clearly making the most of this very useful Direct To Public tool, but the others are kinda missing the point.

Brands, if you have a twitter account…

  • Watch how other brands do it, and do it well (ASOS would be a case in point)
  • Allocate time and resources to monitor and respond to tweets
  • Issue interesting daily updates to keep your followers interested
  • Remember that this is inherently a two-way street – don’t spam your follows with repetition or just send out blatantly commercial ad/sales messages
  • Respond to complaints and criticisms directly, being as personal as possible in the responding tweet

If you don’t…

  • Get one! But only if you are going to commit and run it properly. Otherwise best not to bother until you have the capacity and inclination to do so
  • …making sure in the process that no one else is running an account under your brand name (this happens)
  • Start by following everyone who follows a competitor or any other relevant twitter account – soon people will find and follow you back
  • If in doubt, get some experienced advice to help manage the content you distribute the right kind of message to the right people

And don’t go thinking that Twitter ‘just isn’t relevant’ for your audience. There are over 3 million people using Twitter at the last count and somewhere in that lot will be at least some representatives of your target audience. If you are a mass market brand, the vast majority of people on Twitter will be relevant as they are consumers like everyone else. So don’t fall into the trap of thinking that Twitter is still just the private chat space for media types.

Ultimately, Twitter is just one example of how PR has come full circle and is very much about PUBLIC relations once more, rather than just media relations. Those brands which aren’t willing to engage with the public direct, via Twitter or otherwise, will inevitably find themselves rapidly falling behind.

emailSave to del.icio.usAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
November 19th, 2009 by Louise Mackintosh

Brand profiling for Commuters. A PR pitch just waiting to happen.

Commuters – do you realise that if you all put 10p into a pot you could easily raise enough money to run a PR campaign to raise your profile. You certainly need it. Rarely has there been a collective/group more misunderstood and maligned. ‘Bad rep’ would be an understatement…

In actual fact, I think you’ll find, it would not be that hard a PR task to crack. Commuters are not that bad. We are actually surprisingly nice, given just how many of us there are and how much crap we have to put up with travelling on public transport. For example:

  • On the whole, we do wait for passengers leaving the carriage to exit before we get on (and it’s worth noting that no one who travels between the hours of 10am and 4pm seems to understand the logic of this)
  • People will move down the carriage or lift to make space for others… if asked politely
  • Yes, there is a lack of personal space and some forward shuffling, but generally when the gates have been shut for a while and there is a backlog of people, we get through without issue or a need a resort to violence
  • And people DO get up for the elderly and pregnant women! I have seen it on repeated occasion so it is true. I myself – a pregnant woman of four months – have not had to stand once since it became obvious that I was ‘with child’. Not once. Ok, I make damn sure that everyone can seem me and wear the most bump-promoting clothes I can, but still… they are giving me their seats and should be praised for it

So club together, Mr & Mrs Commuter, and give us a budget we can get our teeth into. And we’ll quickly turn that terrible public reputation around!

Um, now I think about it, and before I sign off, I would like to have a quick rant on a connected subject… the perpetual myth that ‘Londoners are rude’. Well as a Londoner, who knows lots of other Londoners, I can tell you that this is not universally true. People can be rude. There are lots of people in London. So some people in London are rude. But does that not mean that ‘Londoners are rude’. In fact, in the most part this myth is perpetuated by non-Londoners moving into town with the pre-conceived notion that ‘Londoners are rude’, so they often feel its acceptable to forget all the manners that their parents so lovingly instilled in them.

Londoners, themselves, have no reason to be rude. No more reason than anyone else has to be to their fellow townsmen, at any rate.

So enough of this Londoner-bashing please.

And btw, Londoners, you know where you find us if you want us to run a campaign on your behalf too. Consider my 10p pledged.

emailSave to del.icio.usAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
October 2nd, 2009 by Louise Mackintosh

I got Five on it

Blimey it’s been a good week to be Channel Five. Sorry, ‘Five’  (“It’s a good week to be Five” just didn’t look right, somehow)

Firstly the coup that is FlashForward. Feck, that first episode was a corker! There go my Monday nights. Channel 4 and BBC2 – who are, lets face it, the usual coup-masters when it comes to landing decent US exports – must be spitting.

All I need now is terrestrial access to True Blood (coming to Channel 4 I believe, so a sigh of relief from them) and my sad little TV-orientated life will be complete.

Anyway, that’s off the point…

So, then sacks and sacks of free publicity for said blessed channel thanks to the Freeview retune, “to provide 500,000 homes with Five for the first time”.

Nice.

Drinks all round this evening one imagines.

emailSave to del.icio.usAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
September 25th, 2009 by Louise Mackintosh

Going, going, gone…

Why is it that everything I like gets discontinued? Usually it’s cosmetics or grocery products but now even my evening commuter read of choice has been cruelly edited from my life. It’s all getting a bit much.

Like many others, when I read about the demise of thelondonpaper I was sad for them but mainly annoyed that out of the two evening freebies it was MY preference that was going. Sorry London Lite fans, no offence, but why couldn’t your paper have folded instead?!

I always manage to back the loser. The first to go – and this is probably the one I mourn the most – was Sky magazine. Do you remember Sky magazine? It was about the only truly gender neutral youth magazine (ok, until Heat came along… don’t go trying to deny you read it too boys) and it was BRILLIANT. The voice of my youth and student years. And a page that will always stay with me was at the back, where they featured irreverent photo games – ‘Gay or German’ being my all-time favourite.

There have been others – Garden Life for example (yes, yes, I like gardening magazines, what of it?) – and of course we all know why these publications go bust, but that market awareness doesn’t stop you missing them when they’re gone.

So long thelondonpaper. You are missed.

emailSave to del.icio.usAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
August 11th, 2009 by Louise Mackintosh

Pants to Publicity

Honestly, there is blatant and there is PR blatant. And you know that silly season is fully underway when you wake up to a story about Speedos being banned from a theme park…
 
It is actually a story tinged with genius, but then they go an spoil it by saying – quite emphatically – that it’s not just a publicity stunt. Of course it’s a publicity stunt. It’s a great publicity stunt. Why be ashamed to admit it? It’s got everything… reference to the inability of the Englishman to dress stylishly by the pool (tick), an opportunity for the press to print photos of men in embarrassingly tiny pants (tick) and a no holds barred reason to print the immortal phrase ‘back, sack and crack’ in a national newspaper (not only tick but collect £200 and give yourselves a pat on the back for a job well done).
 
Have we become so fearful of being accused of… heaven forbid… doing our job and spinning a good yarn, that we now have to deny it the moment our story hits the press? Honestly, what piffle. I still hold true to the promise that the day a client allows me to issue a ‘Jesus in my pint’ type story (my closest attempt being ‘David Beckham in my ready meal’ – but I was thwarted at the last hurdle) and it gets printed, I will retire on the spot as no achievement can be considered greater than landing a really quality bit of silliness.
 
Whoops! Sorry, am I supposed to be a serious PR with a nose for the latest media issue? Ah well, let’s be honest – we’d all rather be the guy who got ‘Alton Towers bans tiny pants’ past the legal department.
emailSave to del.icio.usAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
July 23rd, 2009 by Louise Mackintosh

When Kelly met… Kelly

As a recently married PR – who opted not to change her name, incidentally – I was most amused to read yesterday about a couple in the States who had married with not only the same surname but the same first name. 
 
Kelly Hildebrandt (f) met Kelly Hildebrandt (m, also known as Carl to avoid real confusion) after spotting they had identical names on Facebook
 
Now I do actually know of a few people who have married someone with the same surname - a Hartley marrying Hartley for example – but this is quite extreme. Particularly as neither name is that common.
 
A freak happening, one could say. Well, maybe 10 years ago. Five years ago even. But not any more. Arguably, this would never have happened without social networks. Ok, there might have been an Annual Hildebrandt Barn Hop (only in America) where the two Kellys might have met, but otherwise this kind of coincidence would be highly unlikely.  Delightful, but unlikely.  
 
So is this our fate? Are we entering an age where coincidences will just fade away to the tune of ever decreasing degrees of separation.  That would be a bit boring, and rather unromantic, wouldn’t it?  While first reading this very story I thought “how funny!” but then immediately changed that to “ah well that explains it then” when I saw they’d met on Facebook. It kinda takes the fun out of the whole thing.
 
But hey, good luck to them. It’s a shame that they are not Mr & Mrs Kelly Cadbury, because they would be raking it in by now.

emailSave to del.icio.usAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!