Visit speed website Speed blog home
November 8th, 2011 by neilrobertson

Retailers must be mobile

Last night was Mobile Monday London’s sixth birthday event at London’s glamorous Centre Point. There were some familiar faces there last night and it was great to be back at a MoMo event, especially one that given the line up of speakers and topics, promised to deliver.

 

Martyn Warwick, from Telecom TV chaired the session with Russell Buckley (@russellbuckley) from Eagle Eye Solutions (client of Speed), Mark Curtis (@fjordmark) from Fjord, David Wood (@DW2) from Accenture and Mike Short from Telefonica all providing their answers to some of the big questions in mobile.

 

Some of those big questions seemed to centre around the death of things…perhaps a little morbid, but it was the conversations on privacy, trust, location and retail that took my particular interest. Much of the industry seems to be concerned about the decline and re-birth of different industries, which is i think only natural. After all, these cycles present a variety of different business opportunities.

 

I’ve heard all of these guys talk at MoMoLo and elsewhere before and although that everyone on the panel last night made some very interesting and valid points…i think that Mark and Russell always provide some fantastic food for thought.

 

I always come out of a MoMo session with a load of notes and thoughts, so I thought that instead of one massive blog post, I’d break it down in to maybe three shorter ones on different topics. So here goes, first up – retail.

 

Live or let die?


If a major high-street retailer doesn’t have a mobile offering today, something I can go to, download, view now, then it could already be too late. Mobile moves at such a rapid pace – evident to see from the recap of the last six years of events since MoMoLo started – that by the time it takes to act on something, it’s already out of date.

 

Five years ago there was no such thing as an iPhone and it was only a very slight minority that were using WAP on their phone to search the web, download JAVA and J2ME apps. Five years in retail never used to be *that* long of a time. In mobile, five years is a lifetime. As mobile commerce is increasing, retailers need to be quicker at adapting otherwise there’s a big risk that consumers leave them behind.

 

Interestingly, econsultancy recently published some stats around retailers and mobile offerings, concluding that:

  • 36 of the top 47 retailers on the list have either a mobile optimised website or a smartphone app.
  • 21 of the 47 have both sites and apps.
  • 9 have just apps, while 6 have a mobile site and no apps.

 

Russell made an interesting point that even when a retailer has a mobile offering and drives a consumer to the store, the battle isn’t won yet. Retailers are competing in their own stores for that consumer to make a purchase – 21% of consumers that own a smartphone have changed their mind about purchasing a product in store as a result of information gathered on their device. Retailers are failing to make the sale even with the consumer there with the product, hand in pocket. But the hand isn’t on their cash; it’s on their mobile.

 

Russell rounded up by concluding that it’s a fact that a lot of digital marketing techniques have passed many retailers by as they’ve never really invested in digital marketing. Many retailers out there are just not geared up for mobile thinking yet, but they have to be as they’re about to go through absolutely massive changes just as the music, publishing and many other industries have.

 

Mark went as far to say that a lot of retail looks dead already. I think that in some ways he’s right, but arguably it’s in retail that a lot of the action and opportunity is right now. Some retailers have made significant effort towards mobile and continue to reap the benefits, Amazon for example is always, always my default choice to check prices, availability etc. and I’ll continue to give them my custom as they provide exceptional service. There are however many others using mobile very well such as Tesco, Ocado and Argos to name a couple.

 

Mark went on to say that retailers who don’t now accept that mobile is very much part of their business are in big trouble and that high street retailers should be looking at making their stores in to experiences rather than just a place to hold and sell stock. Something that Steve Jobs evangelised when the first Apple Store opened in 2001.

In the last 10 years Apple Stores across the globe have provided that ‘Apple experience’ that make visiting a store actually quite an enjoyable experience even when you don’t have anything particular to buy. How many other stores can you name that have a similar effect? I’m struggling to name any other that offers a consumer something similar. Any suggestions?

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
October 17th, 2011 by neilrobertson

How long did the world just spend upgrading to iOS5? Almost 1m years

Today Apple announced that 4m iPhone 4S’ were sold in the opening three days of being on sale. Not only this, but around 25m people upgraded to iOS5. The sales figures were double that of the iPhone 4 opening weekend of sales, but i just wanted to look a little more at that iOS5 update number.

 

If you take out sales of new iPhones it means that there were 21m downloads of iOS5 since it launched. Naturally with 21m people rushing to try and download the latest update, Apple’s servers had a few well publicised problems handling the number of requests. After everything calmed down a bit and i began the upgraded process and encountered the following necessary downloads:

 

  1. A 900mb iTunes update
  2. A 700mb iOS5 update
  3. A 700mb iOS5 iPad update

 

I can hear my internet connection groaning as it starts nibble away at the data…

 

It did get me thinking though.

 

Taking out the iPad update – just how long did the world spend updating their iPhones to iOS5?

 

Prepare for some very rough calculations….

 

According to Mashable the world’s average internet connection speed is 580kbps or roughly 580KBps (about 0.07MB/second – hat tip to Matt Brian from TNW). Right so that’s a good starting point.

 

The rough file size of the two updates (iTunes and iOS5) is 1600mb. The second starting piece.

 

Here goes…

1600 / 0.07  = 22,857

On average it took 22,857 seconds to download the two files to upgrade…..this is just the download, so doesn’t include the time it takes to back up your iPhone/transfer purchases etc.

 

(22,857 X 21,000,000)/60 = 480,000,000,000 seconds

480,000,000,000 /60 = 8,000,000,000 minutes

(8,000,000,000 / 24) /365 =  913,242 years.

 

So if my napkin calculations are correct. Not only did 21m people upgrade to iOS 5 since it launched on 12 October, but they collectively spent roughly 913,242 YEARS doing it……is that right?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
May 9th, 2011 by michael.frier

Technology dominates the most powerful Brand Index

Millward Brown’s most recent brand index has placed six technology companies in the top 10, with Apple taking the top spot from Google. Apple is now valued at £93bn (a rise of 84%), whilst Google is valued at $111.5bn (a drop of 2%).

 

Apple’s strong brand value will not come as a surprise to many people. Us media types are usually found walking through Central London clutching on to iPhones, or if we are feeling especially important that day, an iPad. These two products have been Apple’s major successes in recent years, allowing the brand to appeal to a consumer market and an enterprise market simultaneously. They have essentially done this by making their products really cool and really useful at the same time – or at least giving us enough of an argument to convince our IT managers that we simply can’t live without an iPhone, other PR agencies would surely mock us if we turned up with a, god forbid, Nokia.

 

Google on the other hand have had a year of crisis after crisis. The campaigners for data privacy always seem to end up at the door of Google and have such hurt their brand image. They now appear to be the evil company that they are, having managed to keep the ‘funky start-up’ image going for far longer than deserved. However, a 2% drop isn’t exactly crisis times. They are still seen as a company pushing technological innovation – their work with Twitter during the Egypt crisis was a massive coup for the brand name in that respect.

 

The other interesting mover in the index is Facebook, which made its debut in the top 100 at 35; achieving the highest increase in brand value at 246 percent. I am sure that next year we will see Facebook sore into the top 20, if not the top 10, as Google, Facebook and Apple continue to be the technology brands making the most noise. I am sare that Microsoft and IBM will forever be a permanent fixture in the top 10 but it these three that dominate our consciousness.

Enhanced by Zemanta
February 21st, 2011 by David Bell

Apple: why the media industry needs common sense to prevail

Last week Apple courted controversy by announcing plans to take a 30% cut of all revenue that media companies accrue through selling content on the iPad and iPhone. Their take of subscription revenue overnight will rocket from nought to nearly a third. Peter Preston in this excellent Guardian article pointed out that this would make iPad editions almost as expensive to distribute and sell as print copies.

It’s not only this, but by forcing all subscriptions through the App Store it means that Apple has effectively banned content providers from having a direct relationship with its customers. It’s a breath-taking, arrogant move from Apple that dramatically moves the goalposts.

Media companies, many of which already operate at a loss had pinned great hopes on the growth of tablets offering a more profitable way for punters to consume their content. Now they may need to think again, at least as far as the iPhone and iPad is concerned.

There is some light on the horizon. Just one day after Apple’s announcement, Google launched its One Pass payments system for Andorid which will take just 10% of revenue. Eric Schmidt, its CEO called it “very publisher friendly…we basically don’t make any money on this.”

I for one hope that common sense prevails. Producing quality content costs money and it’s simply not fair that Apple, merely for providing a platform and system for payments (albeit a very successful one) can take 30% of everything. The future of the media industry depends on content providers and platform providers to find a model that suits both parties.

Enhanced by Zemanta
January 31st, 2011 by Sophie Hodgson

Log off and sit back – seriously, try it

Tim Weber’s article ‘Davos 2011:We’re all hyper-connect, now what?’ poses many interesting questions. I’m sure there is the potential here to be clever and pick up on the loss of control for brands etc., but what struck me was the pace of the article. Weber sounded rushed and as I read the article I to found myself becoming tense.

Undoubtedly we’re on the move, contactable and engaged 24/7. For businesses, mobile devices represent the biggest opportunity to do more, more, more than ever before. But for consumers it’s exhausting! We’re all so busy being ‘available’ that we’ve been fooled into thinking that tweets and messages on Facebook are productive and valuable signs of friendship. They might help connect us with a wider community and broaden our horizons – this is good – but if any friend thinks tweeting me (I refuse to join Facebook) for my big 30, or any birthday, is acceptable they can jog on.

My point isn’t that social media is bad, far from it, more that hyper-connectivity as Weber calls it, can mean we lose sight of what’s important. Some critics say the Internet is shutting us down, which if you ask me, is a load of old bollocks. But sometimes there is a lot to be said for putting down laptop/mac/iPad/smart phone, making a cup of tea, putting your feet up and disconnecting. And after reading the article on my iPhone, that’s exactly what I did. Bliss.

Enhanced by Zemanta
September 29th, 2010 by Rebecca Gregory

Apple’s PR Armageddon?

A depiction by Gustave Doré.

Image via Wikipedia

Recent journalist reactions to the recent furore over Steve Jobs’ email exchange with journalist student Chelsea Isaacs, have been interestingly split. There are two camps. Camp 1 sees Steve as the big bad wolf dressed as a little old grandma devouring the innocent student for breakfast. Camp 2 sees Chelsea more as a Goldilocks figure, demanding that Apple provide her with company information given that it’s her basic right to be provided all information that she requires, at any given time.

When her initial efforts to get information from the press office failed, Chelsea went straight to the top and emailed Steve Jobs. Always a smart option (when it’s a justifiable problem).

It does have to be acknowledged that, yes it is notoriously hard for journalists to get through to Apple’s press office (confirmed by ex-Apple press team members and journalists alike). But it is also worth noting that a press office is employed to respond to media requests, not to hand out information for academic dissertations. Academic enquires to a press office aren’t unusual and most PRs I know will politely respond if able to help or not. Given that the Apple one of the largest tech companies in the world I think it’s safe to assume that their press office is inundated with press enquires (that it alone can decide whether to respond to or not), let alone emails from students and the crazy people.

Camp 1 considers Chelsea’s role as a budding journalist as cause for concern (I’m sure Steve is quivering in his knees at the thought of Chelsea starting out on her journalist career with the one aim of taking down Apple. It’s like Lex Luther and Superman, just not as plausible).  Her wherewithal to go direct to the CEO is applauded as showing excellent journalist promise. I suspect Camp 2 sees it smacking of self importance, and naivety. Here’s a quote from Chelsea:

“I was incredibly surprised to find Apple’s Media Relations Department to be absolutely unresponsive to my questions, which (as I had repeatedly told them in voicemail after voicemail) are vital to my academic grade as a student journalist.”

This man is the CEO of one of the biggest brands in the world, that he replied at all is pretty impressive/amusing; she must have really p*ssed him off.

Camp 2 is right; it’s not Apple’s responsibility to help her get a good grade. It does have a responsibility to provide good customer support, but she wasn’t getting in touch regarding a product malfunction! If she was, then good on her – go straight to the CEO once the customer services department is a no go.

The long term impact? It will do her career no harm; no doubt Chelsea will land a jammy role as an investigative journalist pretty sharpish. As for Jobs, back to not being known as Mr Laughsalot and the day job of running a multi-billion dollar company and eating students for breakfast. Naturally, I would never advise a CEO to engage directly with a customer in this manner, but as a PR crisis, it’s hardly Armageddon.

Enhanced by Zemanta
August 16th, 2010 by David Bell

iPhone 5 to feature NFC?

Could NFC or near field communication be heading to the iPhone 5? Apple has just announced that Benjamin Vigier, a renowned NFC guru has been hired as product manager for mobile commerce. But what is NFC and why should we care?

In a nutshell, NFC is a tiny chip within a mobile device which allows us to pay for small purchases (say, under a tenner) by simply waving our mobile phone in the general direction of a NFC reader. Payments are instant and secure and mean that the days of digging around in our pockets for change whilst at the bar could effectively be at an end. No more shrapnel at the end of a night out, no more holes in pockets, no more coins down the side of the sofa.

NFC is not new, boffins at the Dutch semiconductor company NXP had the standard approved in 2003. Barclaycard users will be familiar with it through the innovative Visa payWave on certain credit cards. However it hasn’t taken off on mobile phones as planned, largely because the big players in the industry haven’t reached a consensus on how to deploy the technology.

Could Apple now lead the way and finally extend the benefits of this pretty cool technology to the rest of us?

Enhanced by Zemanta
July 27th, 2010 by michael.frier

Daily News – 27/7

BBC – BlackBerry pose ‘security risk’ say UAE

The United Arab Emirates has said that it could move to restrict or monitor BlackBerry mobile phones, as they pose a “national security risk”.

ComputerWorldUK – Jailbreaking iPhones is deemed legal
Apple has lost its bid to criminalise “jailbreaking,” the practice of hacking an iPhone to install unauthorised apps on the smartphone, following a decision by the US Copyright Office and the Library of Congress.

CIO – Wikileaks and Guardian newspaper reveal Afghan War secret documents

The Wikileaks website has released its controversial ‘Afghan War Diary’ (AWD), a 91,000-file collection of reports detailing disturbing and previously unreported incidents involving US and other NATO forces in Afghanistan.

The Daily Telegraph – ‘Most people’s purchases influenced by social networks’

The majority of consumers now consult ‘friends’ or ‘followers’ on social networks, such as Facebook, before choosing to purchase a new item, according to research firm Gartner.

The Guardian – Ofcom: Broadband ISPs are pulling a fast one

Average speed 46% below that promised by ISPs. Mandatory code and clear penalties vital, experts say

Enhanced by Zemanta
June 8th, 2010 by michael.frier

Daily News – 08/06

The Register – Dodgy Doctor Who games may be malwarey

Security experts are warning that “unauthorised copies” of a Doctor Who game released last weekend that have begun circulating on P2P networks are likely to pack a nasty surprise.

CIO – JP Morgan gets £33m FSA fine for system failure

The Financial Services Authority has issued JP Morgan Securities with a record £33.32 million fine, after the firm failed to separate its own money from that of clients for over seven years. The problem marked a failure by the company to maintain the correct banking processes, the FSA noted, following a major system change.

BBC – Apple shows off redesigned iPhone

Apple has unveiled a redesign of its popular iPhone handset. The revamped gadget has a stainless steel case, two cameras, improved display and is 24% thinner than the most recent version.

BBC – Immarsat grabs the MacRobert engineering prize

The UK’s top engineering prize has been won by Immarsat, for its Broadband Global Area Network (BGAN) service.

Computing.co.uk – Gartner identifies the ‘Cool Vendors’ for 2010

Gartner has identified 55 companies that it expects to make a big impact over the coming year. The analyst firm’s Cool Vendors 2010 list includes organisations that offer “impactful and innovative” products and services, including business processes, data, software infrastructure, security, risk management, applications, consulting, outsourcing, green IT and telecoms operations management.

Computing.co.uk – EasyJet trials infrared ash-avoidance technology

EasyJet will use infrared technology to help its aircraft avoid the remains of the ash cloud caused by the eruption of Iceland’s Eyjafjallajokull volcano.

CBR – Sweden may go 100 per cent cashless to fight crime

In another pioneering example from Scandinavia, which became wired-up much quicker than the UK, in a bid to fight crime Sweden may take a very radical move – and do away with cash altogether. According to a report in German news magazine Der Spiegel, lobbyists are pushing for the nation to move to a completely virtual currency basis.

The Daily Telegraph – Michelin ‘reinvents the wheel’

Michelin claims to have “reinvented the wheel”, integrating tyre, braking system, motorisation and suspension all inside one ground-breaking unit. The latest, most advanced version of the firm’s “Active Wheel” was unveiled at “Challenge Bibendum” a symposium dedicated to environment-friendly mobility, held in Rio de Janeiro.

Computer Weekly – UK finance firms spend more on information security

Almost three-quarters of UK financial services firms have increased their security budgets in the past year, with identity and access management and data loss prevention strategies receiving most funds. Increasing numbers of security threats alongside more regulation is driving increased investment, according to Deloitte’s 2010 Financial Services Global Security Study.



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
June 3rd, 2010 by michael.frier

Daily News – 03/06

BBC – Apple boss defends conditions at iPhone factory

Apple boss Steve Jobs has defended conditions at a Taiwanese electronics firm that products the firm’s popular iPhone, following a spate of suicides.

BBC – The Hurt Locker producers to sue illegal file-sharers

Voltage Pictures, the company behind Oscar-winning film The Hurt Locker, has filed lawsuits against alleged illegal file-sharers of the movie in the US.

CIO – Government to release IT contract financial details

The coalition government will publish all new IT contracts it signs from July, as part of what prime minister David Cameron has called “greater transparency”.

The Register – No-good scareware varmints exploit Wild West game

Varmints are exploiting interest in a treasure hunt tied to popular Wild West-themed game Red Dead Redemption to lay scareware traps.

IT PRO – Thieves steal virtual items from hotel
While the Habbo Hotel thefts were virtual, there were still real financial ramifications.

Total Telecom – Google sites increase share of online video viewing – comScore
YouTube accounted for bulk of Google’s 13.09 billion videos viewed online in April.

ComputerWorldUK – Government to release IT contract financial details
The coalition government will publish online all new IT contracts it signs from July, as part of what prime minister David Cameron has called “greater transparency”.

The Daily Telegraph – Sony: ebooks to overtake print within five years

Sales of ebooks will overtake print books within the next five years, Sony has predicted.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]