Visit speed website Speed blog home
September 18th, 2012 by

Mobile and retail: A teenage relationship

Sitting comfortably? Got a tea or coffee? Then i’ll begin…

 

Mobile and retail: like two newly acquainted teenagers fumbling around in the dark, don’t fully understand each other yet.

We’re not just talking about mobile commerce from afar here; we’re talking about using mobile in a store to shop around. Consumers using mobile for retail opportunities isn’t a new concept. People have been using their phones while on the high street to check prices and products for a few years now, but it’s only now it’s starting to boom and now that retailers are trying to catch up.

 

In August The Guardian ran a piece by OgilvyAction MD of Digital, Simon Stebbing, looking at some research it conducted around mobile behaviour and touched on retail. The research (surveying 1000 UK consumers) revealed that women are more likely than men, to use a mobile dedicated mobile site rather than an app for purchases on mobile.

 

Having a mobile dedicated site should be a no-brainer for any retailer. Consumers have a device in their pocket that can connect to the internet from pretty much anywhere, which means that there’s the potential to buy something….from pretty much anywhere. If a retailer has a website, then it should have a dedicated mobile site, but research performed earlier in the year by leading mobile marketing agency Somo (a Speed client) on the IMRG/Hitwise Top 100 Online Retailers, indicated that only 57% of them had a dedicated mobile website.

Somo’s research also uncovered that 43% of those retailers had no iPhone app and 63% had no app for Android devices and considering Android has a market share of around 50% in the UK, that’s a massive missed opportunity.

 

It’s interesting to see according to the OgilvyAction piece, retailers appear to prefer a mobile website over an app. The reason for this becomes a little more apparent when you consider that according to the research the ‘majority’ of smartphone users (56% of women and 51% of men) surveyed were Blackberry users (21% of women with a smartphone and 15% of men).

The app ecosystem on a Blackberry is a long way off that of Apple or Android devices and so using a mobile site is probably a much better user experience. Interestingly, the UK is one of RIM’s last remaining strongholds and typically is with a demographic that historically, wasn’t part of Blackberry’s DNA: teenagers.

 

From the research, it seems that women are a bit savvier than men when it comes to shopping around on mobile when out on the high street, with just under half of women browsing competitor sites while in a store. I’m not going to relist the interesting parts of the research here, but instead talk about how retailers should react.

 

Over in the US, the practice of shopping around via your mobile while in a store has been coined as ‘showrooming’. Basically using the store as a, you guessed it, a ‘showroom’, which is straight forward enough and it’s something a lot of people have been doing for years.

 

We’ve all been there. We’ve all done it. I remember doing this a couple of years ago when looking for a new TV. I went to a big  electrical, high street chain to check out what different TVs looked like and how they measured up both in terms of physical size and attributes. While in the store I had used my mobile to do  a little price-comparison research on my TV of choice, so I knew roughly what I wanted and the different prices I could get it for. In the process of doing this I had probably three different store workers come up to me to ask if I was ok. They knew what I was doing on my phone, they had seen me typing away, taking pictures and scanning barcodes but they just couldn’t really do anything about it.

 

The only time I asked for a store assistant’s help was to see what the movement was around price, so that I could walk out of the store that afternoon with my TV of choice that afternoon (waiting for delivery is such a pain). The store wasn’t prepared to move on price at all, or, as I suggested, bundle in something like a surround system at a bit of a discount, or provide any other incentive for me. I really was trying my best to give them ways for me to justify handing over my cash. The only sensible option I had was to walk away with the retailer having no real idea what i had been looking at and where, with no real opportunity to take any action about it But today it needn’t be like this.

 

Short of confiscating phones at the door, retailers can’t stop people using their phones to browse elsewhere. Instead of trying to block phone signal in store and create a black-out zone, retailers should be embracing technology to help turn ‘showrooming’ in to something they can benefit from, turning any threats in to potential opportunities.

 

Retailers have been spending the last five or so years trying to get their heads around mobile and it seems that after the app boom, some of them are falling a little out of love with apps after not seeing enough of a return on their investment in terms of money, footfall or engagement. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing. It means that some retailers will no longer just pump out an app without thinking, just to tick a box. They’ve realised that it needs careful planning and strategic thought to make it work. They’ve realised that mobile can’t be a quick fix, it needs to be an integrated part of their marketing efforts and that perhaps an app isn’t the most effective way  to address a mobile audience.

 

When someone is searching for something on a mobile device, it’s usually something that’s time relevant and access speed is extremely important. This means that it’s a search for something that’s relevant at a certain time and that there are specific details around the search and because it’s all on the move, the quicker the results can be delivered, the better. With that in mind, something simple like providing free, secured Wi-Fi customers can connect to could be a great way for retailers to provide customers with a quicker way of searching the web. From a retailers point of view it could also provide them with a channel to communicate to customers and provide them with an incentive to buy in store, not to mention a way of gathering valuable analytical data to enhance a customer’s experience.

 

Wi-Fi technology has been around for ages and yet it’s rarely seen in retailers, aside from coffee shops and there’s no reason why this should be the case. There’s a wealth of technology available that retailers should be considering implementing but this can’t be about limiting a customer’s experience through technology but more about using it to influence and engage with them. Less about how they can stop consumers doing ‘x’ and ‘y’ and more about how they can encourage them. If a customer walks in to a store, looks around while using their mobile, the retailer has no idea who that person is, what they’re really looking for or why they decided to leave.

There’s a famous cartoon by Peter Steiner that was published in The New Yorker in 1993 that had the caption, “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.” The same sort of thing could be said about the details retailers know about consumers coming in to their store and then leaving.

 

"On the high street, nobody realises you're a dog until they ask"

 

Come on retailers, let’s see you really do something innovative with technology and not just stand back and watch the pound signs walk out the door.

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
February 28th, 2012 by

Back in Barca

It’s always the way with MWC, if you’re not attending keynote sessions or checking news or #MWC12 to see what’s happening, you do tend to lose track of what’s going on and what’s being announced or indeed what on Earth is happening in the real world, as lets face it, MWC can be a lot of smoke and mirrors, especially in terms of technology working – just ask @twofourseven Julio Romo.

Tapas and tablets

In Barcelona it’s incredibly easy to find bad tapas. The same can probably be said for MWC and tablet devices. It’s not like the conference has been inundated with tablets, unlike the Met, not that many manufacturers are giving out tablets, let alone horses. There are however a few devices on show, without naming any names, that just make you stop and think “really? This is what you’re pinning your tablet hopes on for the next 12 months? No putting it in to a Porsche doesn’t make it any better.”

With that out of the way, whats been catching the eye so far? Here’s a quick run down of what’s caught my interest.

There can only be One

HTC has come under fire over the last year as it has perhaps churned out handset after handset without much thought in attempt to flood the market with Android devices. It seemed to be heading down a dead end street – quantity over quality.

It might have been Google’s acquisition of Motorola last year that gave the company the jolt it needed to try a little harder, but whatever it was, it seems to have worked. HTC arguably have the phone of the conference with the One X. It’s a beautiful device, that will definitely be giving the likes of Samsung a run for its money in the Android stakes this year. You can also bet that the guys from Apple walking the floor at this year’s show (you can’t see them, but make no mistake they’re here – like undercover CIA agents), will definitely be taking note of the HTC One series phones.

Nothing to Note from Samsung

As it pulled showing the Galaxy S III at MWC, Samsung is giving the Note a huge push, but can it bring the stylus back from oblivion?

What actually caught my eye on the Samsung stand was a couple of laptops it had – very Apple-esque in terms of looks. One of them seems a little too close for comfort to the MacBook Air. Needless to say, very nice pieces of kit.

Huwei and ZTE handsets are coming to the UK in April. Two of the biggest device manufacturers in Asia will be distributing a number of devices through operator partners from Q2 this year. Both have been showing off some powerful hardware, prodominently running Android and the occasional Windows phone. Definitely two to keep an eye on this year.

Nokia Adventures

Taking a leaf out of Android’s MWC 2011 play book, Nokia (with some of Microsoft’s budget) has taken it one step further. Taking over one of the top sections of Hall 7, half of the Nokia experience is about devices, such as the Lumia 900 and the 808 (42mp camera phone). That’s right, a phone with a 42megapixel sensor for the camera. It’s certainly grabbed a lot of headlines but can you imagine trying to upload that photo to Facebook or Twitter while on the go?! It would take forever and cost as much as the phone itself.

The other half of Nokia’s space is purely a place for people meet and sit down, drink free coffee, eat free popcorn and jump on the free wifi – which is fantastic. By doing this Nokia gets a lot of people to come sit down, do their business around a healthy dose of Nokia people and continuous videos showing videos of the latest handsets and what Nokia’s doing throughout the week. Even if it might have been done with some Microsoft money, well played Nokia. Well played.

PayPaella

PayPal and ebay have a big presence this year and perhaps rightly so given the push around mobile commerce they’ve been making this last year. Set up as more of a demo experience, the stand has a number of items visitors can scan with a QR code reader to go through a purchase process (CHECK).

It’s a great idea but it seems to be preaching to the choir. Most of the industry knows how PayPal is being implemented across events etc. the bigger push has to be around wider consumer education and adoption.

PayPal has put itself to the test for congress delegates by having a code to scan to skip the long queues outside for paella and get €1 off the price. Great stuff….The problem with this however, is that when you advertise that code all over the place, you start to get long queues of people who have scanned to avoid the queue.

It is, unfortunately, inevitable to be queuing for pretty much everything at MWC, from coffee to chairs, taxis to toilets, there isn’t really a way around it. Much like the fragmented approach to mobile payments….which is something for another blog post, another time.

20120228-154607.jpg

November 8th, 2011 by

Retailers must be mobile

Last night was Mobile Monday London’s sixth birthday event at London’s glamorous Centre Point. There were some familiar faces there last night and it was great to be back at a MoMo event, especially one that given the line up of speakers and topics, promised to deliver.

 

Martyn Warwick, from Telecom TV chaired the session with Russell Buckley (@russellbuckley) from Eagle Eye Solutions (client of Speed), Mark Curtis (@fjordmark) from Fjord, David Wood (@DW2) from Accenture and Mike Short from Telefonica all providing their answers to some of the big questions in mobile.

 

Some of those big questions seemed to centre around the death of things…perhaps a little morbid, but it was the conversations on privacy, trust, location and retail that took my particular interest. Much of the industry seems to be concerned about the decline and re-birth of different industries, which is i think only natural. After all, these cycles present a variety of different business opportunities.

 

I’ve heard all of these guys talk at MoMoLo and elsewhere before and although that everyone on the panel last night made some very interesting and valid points…i think that Mark and Russell always provide some fantastic food for thought.

 

I always come out of a MoMo session with a load of notes and thoughts, so I thought that instead of one massive blog post, I’d break it down in to maybe three shorter ones on different topics. So here goes, first up – retail.

 

Live or let die?


If a major high-street retailer doesn’t have a mobile offering today, something I can go to, download, view now, then it could already be too late. Mobile moves at such a rapid pace – evident to see from the recap of the last six years of events since MoMoLo started – that by the time it takes to act on something, it’s already out of date.

 

Five years ago there was no such thing as an iPhone and it was only a very slight minority that were using WAP on their phone to search the web, download JAVA and J2ME apps. Five years in retail never used to be *that* long of a time. In mobile, five years is a lifetime. As mobile commerce is increasing, retailers need to be quicker at adapting otherwise there’s a big risk that consumers leave them behind.

 

Interestingly, econsultancy recently published some stats around retailers and mobile offerings, concluding that:

  • 36 of the top 47 retailers on the list have either a mobile optimised website or a smartphone app.
  • 21 of the 47 have both sites and apps.
  • 9 have just apps, while 6 have a mobile site and no apps.

 

Russell made an interesting point that even when a retailer has a mobile offering and drives a consumer to the store, the battle isn’t won yet. Retailers are competing in their own stores for that consumer to make a purchase – 21% of consumers that own a smartphone have changed their mind about purchasing a product in store as a result of information gathered on their device. Retailers are failing to make the sale even with the consumer there with the product, hand in pocket. But the hand isn’t on their cash; it’s on their mobile.

 

Russell rounded up by concluding that it’s a fact that a lot of digital marketing techniques have passed many retailers by as they’ve never really invested in digital marketing. Many retailers out there are just not geared up for mobile thinking yet, but they have to be as they’re about to go through absolutely massive changes just as the music, publishing and many other industries have.

 

Mark went as far to say that a lot of retail looks dead already. I think that in some ways he’s right, but arguably it’s in retail that a lot of the action and opportunity is right now. Some retailers have made significant effort towards mobile and continue to reap the benefits, Amazon for example is always, always my default choice to check prices, availability etc. and I’ll continue to give them my custom as they provide exceptional service. There are however many others using mobile very well such as Tesco, Ocado and Argos to name a couple.

 

Mark went on to say that retailers who don’t now accept that mobile is very much part of their business are in big trouble and that high street retailers should be looking at making their stores in to experiences rather than just a place to hold and sell stock. Something that Steve Jobs evangelised when the first Apple Store opened in 2001.

In the last 10 years Apple Stores across the globe have provided that ‘Apple experience’ that make visiting a store actually quite an enjoyable experience even when you don’t have anything particular to buy. How many other stores can you name that have a similar effect? I’m struggling to name any other that offers a consumer something similar. Any suggestions?

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
October 17th, 2011 by

How long did the world just spend upgrading to iOS5? Almost 1m years

Today Apple announced that 4m iPhone 4S’ were sold in the opening three days of being on sale. Not only this, but around 25m people upgraded to iOS5. The sales figures were double that of the iPhone 4 opening weekend of sales, but i just wanted to look a little more at that iOS5 update number.

 

If you take out sales of new iPhones it means that there were 21m downloads of iOS5 since it launched. Naturally with 21m people rushing to try and download the latest update, Apple’s servers had a few well publicised problems handling the number of requests. After everything calmed down a bit and i began the upgraded process and encountered the following necessary downloads:

 

  1. A 900mb iTunes update
  2. A 700mb iOS5 update
  3. A 700mb iOS5 iPad update

 

I can hear my internet connection groaning as it starts nibble away at the data…

 

It did get me thinking though.

 

Taking out the iPad update – just how long did the world spend updating their iPhones to iOS5?

 

Prepare for some very rough calculations….

 

According to Mashable the world’s average internet connection speed is 580kbps or roughly 580KBps (about 0.07MB/second – hat tip to Matt Brian from TNW). Right so that’s a good starting point.

 

The rough file size of the two updates (iTunes and iOS5) is 1600mb. The second starting piece.

 

Here goes…

1600 / 0.07  = 22,857

On average it took 22,857 seconds to download the two files to upgrade…..this is just the download, so doesn’t include the time it takes to back up your iPhone/transfer purchases etc.

 

(22,857 X 21,000,000)/60 = 480,000,000,000 seconds

480,000,000,000 /60 = 8,000,000,000 minutes

(8,000,000,000 / 24) /365 =  913,242 years.

 

So if my napkin calculations are correct. Not only did 21m people upgrade to iOS 5 since it launched on 12 October, but they collectively spent roughly 913,242 YEARS doing it……is that right?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
May 9th, 2011 by

Technology dominates the most powerful Brand Index

Millward Brown’s most recent brand index has placed six technology companies in the top 10, with Apple taking the top spot from Google. Apple is now valued at £93bn (a rise of 84%), whilst Google is valued at $111.5bn (a drop of 2%).

 

Apple’s strong brand value will not come as a surprise to many people. Us media types are usually found walking through Central London clutching on to iPhones, or if we are feeling especially important that day, an iPad. These two products have been Apple’s major successes in recent years, allowing the brand to appeal to a consumer market and an enterprise market simultaneously. They have essentially done this by making their products really cool and really useful at the same time – or at least giving us enough of an argument to convince our IT managers that we simply can’t live without an iPhone, other PR agencies would surely mock us if we turned up with a, god forbid, Nokia.

 

Google on the other hand have had a year of crisis after crisis. The campaigners for data privacy always seem to end up at the door of Google and have such hurt their brand image. They now appear to be the evil company that they are, having managed to keep the ‘funky start-up’ image going for far longer than deserved. However, a 2% drop isn’t exactly crisis times. They are still seen as a company pushing technological innovation – their work with Twitter during the Egypt crisis was a massive coup for the brand name in that respect.

 

The other interesting mover in the index is Facebook, which made its debut in the top 100 at 35; achieving the highest increase in brand value at 246 percent. I am sure that next year we will see Facebook sore into the top 20, if not the top 10, as Google, Facebook and Apple continue to be the technology brands making the most noise. I am sare that Microsoft and IBM will forever be a permanent fixture in the top 10 but it these three that dominate our consciousness.

Enhanced by Zemanta
February 21st, 2011 by

Apple: why the media industry needs common sense to prevail

Last week Apple courted controversy by announcing plans to take a 30% cut of all revenue that media companies accrue through selling content on the iPad and iPhone. Their take of subscription revenue overnight will rocket from nought to nearly a third. Peter Preston in this excellent Guardian article pointed out that this would make iPad editions almost as expensive to distribute and sell as print copies.

It’s not only this, but by forcing all subscriptions through the App Store it means that Apple has effectively banned content providers from having a direct relationship with its customers. It’s a breath-taking, arrogant move from Apple that dramatically moves the goalposts.

Media companies, many of which already operate at a loss had pinned great hopes on the growth of tablets offering a more profitable way for punters to consume their content. Now they may need to think again, at least as far as the iPhone and iPad is concerned.

There is some light on the horizon. Just one day after Apple’s announcement, Google launched its One Pass payments system for Andorid which will take just 10% of revenue. Eric Schmidt, its CEO called it “very publisher friendly…we basically don’t make any money on this.”

I for one hope that common sense prevails. Producing quality content costs money and it’s simply not fair that Apple, merely for providing a platform and system for payments (albeit a very successful one) can take 30% of everything. The future of the media industry depends on content providers and platform providers to find a model that suits both parties.

Enhanced by Zemanta
January 31st, 2011 by

Log off and sit back – seriously, try it

Tim Weber’s article ‘Davos 2011:We’re all hyper-connect, now what?’ poses many interesting questions. I’m sure there is the potential here to be clever and pick up on the loss of control for brands etc., but what struck me was the pace of the article. Weber sounded rushed and as I read the article I to found myself becoming tense.

Undoubtedly we’re on the move, contactable and engaged 24/7. For businesses, mobile devices represent the biggest opportunity to do more, more, more than ever before. But for consumers it’s exhausting! We’re all so busy being ‘available’ that we’ve been fooled into thinking that tweets and messages on Facebook are productive and valuable signs of friendship. They might help connect us with a wider community and broaden our horizons – this is good – but if any friend thinks tweeting me (I refuse to join Facebook) for my big 30, or any birthday, is acceptable they can jog on.

My point isn’t that social media is bad, far from it, more that hyper-connectivity as Weber calls it, can mean we lose sight of what’s important. Some critics say the Internet is shutting us down, which if you ask me, is a load of old bollocks. But sometimes there is a lot to be said for putting down laptop/mac/iPad/smart phone, making a cup of tea, putting your feet up and disconnecting. And after reading the article on my iPhone, that’s exactly what I did. Bliss.

Enhanced by Zemanta
September 29th, 2010 by

Apple’s PR Armageddon?

A depiction by Gustave Doré.

Image via Wikipedia

Recent journalist reactions to the recent furore over Steve Jobs’ email exchange with journalist student Chelsea Isaacs, have been interestingly split. There are two camps. Camp 1 sees Steve as the big bad wolf dressed as a little old grandma devouring the innocent student for breakfast. Camp 2 sees Chelsea more as a Goldilocks figure, demanding that Apple provide her with company information given that it’s her basic right to be provided all information that she requires, at any given time.

When her initial efforts to get information from the press office failed, Chelsea went straight to the top and emailed Steve Jobs. Always a smart option (when it’s a justifiable problem).

It does have to be acknowledged that, yes it is notoriously hard for journalists to get through to Apple’s press office (confirmed by ex-Apple press team members and journalists alike). But it is also worth noting that a press office is employed to respond to media requests, not to hand out information for academic dissertations. Academic enquires to a press office aren’t unusual and most PRs I know will politely respond if able to help or not. Given that the Apple one of the largest tech companies in the world I think it’s safe to assume that their press office is inundated with press enquires (that it alone can decide whether to respond to or not), let alone emails from students and the crazy people.

Camp 1 considers Chelsea’s role as a budding journalist as cause for concern (I’m sure Steve is quivering in his knees at the thought of Chelsea starting out on her journalist career with the one aim of taking down Apple. It’s like Lex Luther and Superman, just not as plausible).  Her wherewithal to go direct to the CEO is applauded as showing excellent journalist promise. I suspect Camp 2 sees it smacking of self importance, and naivety. Here’s a quote from Chelsea:

“I was incredibly surprised to find Apple’s Media Relations Department to be absolutely unresponsive to my questions, which (as I had repeatedly told them in voicemail after voicemail) are vital to my academic grade as a student journalist.”

This man is the CEO of one of the biggest brands in the world, that he replied at all is pretty impressive/amusing; she must have really p*ssed him off.

Camp 2 is right; it’s not Apple’s responsibility to help her get a good grade. It does have a responsibility to provide good customer support, but she wasn’t getting in touch regarding a product malfunction! If she was, then good on her – go straight to the CEO once the customer services department is a no go.

The long term impact? It will do her career no harm; no doubt Chelsea will land a jammy role as an investigative journalist pretty sharpish. As for Jobs, back to not being known as Mr Laughsalot and the day job of running a multi-billion dollar company and eating students for breakfast. Naturally, I would never advise a CEO to engage directly with a customer in this manner, but as a PR crisis, it’s hardly Armageddon.

Enhanced by Zemanta
August 16th, 2010 by

iPhone 5 to feature NFC?

Could NFC or near field communication be heading to the iPhone 5? Apple has just announced that Benjamin Vigier, a renowned NFC guru has been hired as product manager for mobile commerce. But what is NFC and why should we care?

In a nutshell, NFC is a tiny chip within a mobile device which allows us to pay for small purchases (say, under a tenner) by simply waving our mobile phone in the general direction of a NFC reader. Payments are instant and secure and mean that the days of digging around in our pockets for change whilst at the bar could effectively be at an end. No more shrapnel at the end of a night out, no more holes in pockets, no more coins down the side of the sofa.

NFC is not new, boffins at the Dutch semiconductor company NXP had the standard approved in 2003. Barclaycard users will be familiar with it through the innovative Visa payWave on certain credit cards. However it hasn’t taken off on mobile phones as planned, largely because the big players in the industry haven’t reached a consensus on how to deploy the technology.

Could Apple now lead the way and finally extend the benefits of this pretty cool technology to the rest of us?

Enhanced by Zemanta