Visit speed website Speed blog home
May 6th, 2011 by John Brown

PR fashion – we’re just so creatively dressed!

Assorted colorful flip-flops.

Image via Wikipedia

If you were to ask anyone at Speed towers for a single sentence that described me I’m 99 per-cent sure that they would respond with ‘style icon’.  Today, as I sit at my desk in a well-worn pair of flip-flops, three-quarter length shorts and a seven-year-old tee-shirt, it’s obvious why my colleagues would reach this conclusion.

I’m so far ahead of the fashion curve that people sometimes confuse forward-thinking dress with poor taste and a lack of self-respect – the fools. However this has got me thinking, is PR an industry where looks count for so much more than in other professions?

Take, for example, the simple suit. A staple in the wardrobes of those that walk the streets of the financial districts across the world, as well as the halls of power at the Whitehouse and the Houses of Parliament. And what’s more, my older colleagues tell me it was, up until recently, obligatory to wear a suit within the PR industry as well.  Yet suits are largely ignored in our profession today. Why is that?

Well my thoughts are that we’re expected to emanate creativity and personality – and we bloody love playing up to that. Not only that, the industries we work with are also becoming more relaxed and casual, and we want to say to them ‘look, we’re just like you too! Only a touch more creative’

I have a hat fetish for example, and proudly wear a variety of headgear to client meetings, launches and day-to-day activities. I think it adds character and shouts, ‘this man is confident, smart and probably superb in the sack’ – others think I just look like a tosser.

I once worked with a learned gentleman who was immaculately dressed every day, donning the latest trend superbly. He was also famed for his blindingly bright-coloured, natural fibre, socks (can you guess who it is yet?).

While this sort of ‘extrovert’ dress sense would be instantly berated at the Bank of England or Downing Street, clients have become largely oblivious and almost expectant of wardrobe sensations from their PR consultants.

Of course there are exceptions to this and still the suit gets a dusting off as and when required, but largely those working in the PR industry will each be striving to show just how creative and on-trend they are from tip-to-toe.

Still it’s not all bad.  We could be web developers. They take this whole debate to an entirely new dimension.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
January 27th, 2011 by Marie Efthymiou

The NTA Awards & ‘that’ tattoo . . .

Our favourite British soap stars and best loved TV personalities hit the red carpet in full force last night to celebrate the annual National Television Awards. The crux of the competition as always rests on who will take home the ‘Best Serial Drama’ prize, Eastenders or Corrie? But actually this year’s biggest battle took place on the red carpet, as TV’s hottest residents donned their glad rags for all-out glamour.

As each starlet posed and pouted in front of a wall of long lenses, the fashion and beauty editors of the popular tabloids and glossies had their pens poised to paper, capturing who wore what, or more importantly who wore whom. Which stylist shouldn’t answer the phone this morning in fear of being sacked and what shade of lipstick should we be popping out on our lunch break to buy.

Unsurprisingly, the nation’s sweetheart Cheryl Cole dominated the headlines today. Not for her bondage style backless dress but the new expansive tattoo across her lower back. It begs the question if she’ll now do for Henna ink what she did for red-hair dye? We shouldn’t underestimate the influence that celebrities have on everyday women’s purchasing habits. Cheryl alone has the ability to make sales rocket of any product – just ask L’Oreal or Wolford!

When she dyed her luscious locks red with L’Oreal Casting Crème Gloss, sales of the product went up by a whopping 114%. Her performance on the X Factor wearing Wolford Sahara Bondage tights resulted in fashion mecca Selfridges issuing a statement to the press that week admitting they had completely sold out. Women who would usually purchase a multi-pack of M&S Black Opaque Tights for a fiver were now clambering over each other to buy one £32 pair of tights. Hopefully they weren’t too disappointed that their legs didn’t look quite like hers – but who cares when they’re one step closer to looking like their favourite star.

That’s the power of the ‘me too’ approach – we want a little slice of their world (or wardrobe) just for ourselves and it has brands clamouring after the elusive killer deal with just the right celeb with the all-important ‘x’-factor.

Enhanced by Zemanta
September 17th, 2010 by Helen Beavis

Philanthropy or bust?

Forget fashion, celebrities and cheating footballers the biggest trend for 2010 has to be philanthropy.  We’ve seen challenges set to US billionaires to donate half their wealth to good causes, Lord Sainsbury has just handed over £25m to the arts and the government is trying to revive a sense of ‘good will’ in the form of the big society agenda.

But if it wasn’t for all these wealthy givers what state would our society and economy really be in?  Philanthropy has been around for centuries, but just as society and the world we live in is fast changing pace, so must philanthropy in order to keep up.

On a recent meeting with one such philanthropist, Marcelle Speller, who has just launched Localgiving.com, it made me realise just how important these contributions, be it monetary or time, are to our society.

It also drummed home that this is a trend more brands need to embrace, given the very real appetite that’s starting to emerge among society.

Enhanced by Zemanta
June 10th, 2010 by Simon Matthews

2010’s: The Death of Creativity?

Back to the eighties
Image by patries71 via Flickr

I have a gripe that started perhaps in the late 90s but certainly in the (frankly awfully named) noughties: creative thought has died a horrible death. We live in a stagnant nostalgia culture which praises the out-dated and defunct.

It sounds harsh, but I sincerely believe that it is true. I challenge you, dear reader, to name one item in the arts world of the last decade which was the fruit of a truly original and creative idea. I’ve tried, but I keep coming back to the point at which artistic ideas come from rehashed remembrances of another era’s creativity.

The art world has never really recovered from the post-modernism movement. Music hasn’t produced anything fresh since early 90′s hip-hop. All the films being made at the moment are sequels or 80′s remakes.

Technology is often pointed to as something which defines us in the 2010′s (no one seems to have come up with a snappy shortening for this decade yet), but our technical prowess is only just starting to catch up with the imaginations of authors from the 60s 70s and 80s. Our latest toy, the iPad, has a long legacy stretching back at least 23 years to Star Trek the Next Generation (if you will forgive the geeky reference), which provided almost every member of its crew with a PADD. It is not yet quite that ubiquitous in our society, although this kind of device will inevitably play a bigger part in people’s lives.

The last decade of fashion and clothing, following an almost identical pattern to music fashions, started in the 60′s and has shifted, decade to decade, to the 80′s now. Bad hairstyles and big white shoes are almost everywhere. 30 years of culture rehashed in 10. Next up will be the 90′s, which is bad enough (parachute pants and heat reactive t-shirts anyone?). Will “noughties-60′s retro” be the new fashion? Such meta-referencing plays well to post-modernism, but isn’t that a bit old hat now?

Do we now live in a pastiche culture? Where are our creative geniuses? Have they all been wasted regurgitating past glory days? Looking to the past is an important part of understanding who we are and where we came from, but that’s not where new ideas come from.

Working in the creative industries, the decline of creativity is something that concerns me greatly. We have to innovate to progress. We need people in the creative, artistic and technology industries to step-up to the mark and drive things forwards, we can’t sit around and wait for other people to do it for us. I’m willing to help drive change, but I can’t do it alone – are you willing to really change the future?

Enhanced by Zemanta
April 19th, 2010 by Chris McCrudden

Real men don't wear gold shoes. Do they?

A fascinating request for comment went around Response Source  this morning from Simon Brooke, one of my favourite freelancers. It said:

“I’m writing a piece for the Financial Times about the current trend for brightly coloured shoes for men… It would be someone who is a shoe fan but thinks that gold, bright blue or shocking pink footwear is just too much and that guys will never go for them. “

The truth of the matter that innovation and the male shoe have never made comfortable bedfellows. In fact, time was that your choice of shoe made a very definite statement about what you did in bed. Wearing suede shoes, for example, was a signal that when it came to love, you preferred the kind “that dare not speak its name”. And so rebellious was the act of wearing leather’s furrier cousin on your feet, that it used to get you expelled from Oxford or Cambridge universities.

Sexual politics may have moved on since then, but men’s footwear has stayed conservative, sloughing off numerous false dawns, including: -

  • The platform shoe  – rendered forever unacceptable by Rodney Bewes wearing them in repeats of The Likely Lads
  • The mandal (male sandal) – for every Russell Crowe in Gladiator there have been 100 beard-wearing real ale enthusiasts called Geoff
  • The Croc – wearing a colander on your feet is not – and never will be – a hot look
  • The medge (male wedge) – a stillborn innovation. Let us never speak of it again

So while it’s possible to get temporarily excited about Kurt Geiger’s range of rainbow driving shoes, metallic oxford lace-ups (though Hedi Slimane was doing this for Dior Homme in 2003, so it’s not that current) and the ruby slipper-inspired pointy dress shoe that Office sells EVERY Christmas, let’s not call an end to conservatism just yet.

For one thing, colourful shoes can have a dampening effect on the rest of your wardrobe. They often compel you to tone the rest of your outfit down for fear that those sky-blue loafers will make you look like you’ve joined the Circus of Cuban Pimps. Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross might be able to get away with them, but they’ve made a living from dressing up like Christmas trees with a Y chromosome, and most of us haven’t. Catwalk aside, men’s fashion still lives in mortal fear of trying too hard, and looking too different.

It’s therefore no surprise that fashion brands try to foist these things on male shoppers every couple of years and they overwhelmingly end up in the sale racks, snapped up for a song by Christmas partygoers, off-duty drag queens and low-rent cabaret performers (myself included). The novelty shoe is the opposite of a puppy. It’s not for life, but it might do for Christmas.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
March 26th, 2010 by Chris McCrudden

Imitation is the lamest form of flattery

According to Oscar Wilde, “talent borrows, genius steals”. Except if you’re a visual merchandiser for an unnamed fashion retailer who takes a literal-minded approach to following youth trends.

Lady GaGa‘s video for “Telephone” may be the first music promo ever to get more than a billion online views, but this success has spawned a monster. The tribute ‘Telephone’ window display, now available to gawp at on London’s Oxford Street. It is, needless to say, amazing. Marvel at the ham-fisted opportunism! Be astonished by the bad weaves! Laugh your mammaries off at the fact they’ve bothered to pin Diet Coke cans in one of the mannequin’s weaves.

Now if you don’t mind, we’re off to storyboard the video for Alejandro.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
March 25th, 2010 by Chris McCrudden

Back to the 90s – passive smoking

Trends are cyclical things. If it hangs around long enough, a product, idea or a person can have more than one shot at the zeitgeist. Provided everyone understands that between those two spells in the limelight are long periods spent hanging around in second-hand shops or bad dissertations, and doing summer seasons at Butlins.

For gauging whether something or someone’s time has come again I usually apply what I call the ’10 and 20 year rule’. Which means that if it was ten years ago, it’s disgusting (hence why J-Lo’s in the doldrums right now), but if it was 20 years ago, it must be amazing. So watch this space for the 2Unlimited revival – because it’s the 20th anniversary of ‘Get Ready For This‘ in 2011.

This rule, however, assumes that we might want a concept back in a million years. And there are plenty of exceptions for this. So while it’s unfortunate that we’re celebrating the 20th anniversary of negative equity with…yet more negative equity I do doubt whether there are trendsetters sitting in coffee shops saying:

“Ohmygod, shelling out for a new-build flat four years ago and finding out it’s worth 30 grand less than you paid for it is SO HOTRIGHTNOW. My friend Serge is totally doing that.”

I’m detecting there’s even less enthusiasm for passive smoking. This seems to have climbed out of the yellow label bin of public health scares and back into the collective consciousness this week. Bringing us such retro headlines as

Smoking ban proposed - BBC News
Smoking in cars: a ban too far – The Telegraph
Doctors demand smoking ban in private carsReuters
(And 208 other results, according to our friends at Google News.)

Putting aside the ethical considerations of smoking around your kids in a confined space for a moment, I can’t think of a more 90s concept than passive smoking. It’s like Tamagotchis, All Saints and POGs, which gripped us twenty years ago, but seem quaint and inconceivable now. And let’s not have it back, shall we?

So, for the good of all our sanities, let’s take the national unconscious decision to smoke less in the car. Because you know what’ll happen if we don’t. There’ll be a preachy TV advert campaign. We’ll have Ed Balls doing his unconvincing “think of the children” act all over the BBC. And someone, somewhere will inevitably think that it’s a good idea to use Twitter as a public health preaching platform, thus creating the new portmanteau word of ‘Tweaching’.

And that last reason alone is, I think, reason enough for us not to welcome this little bit of the 90s back into our homes.

But I’ll leave you with a piece of the 90s that is worth saving. Corona’s Rhythm of the Night, which is awesome.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
February 23rd, 2010 by Marie Efthymiou

Live the life of a fashionista (for 1 week) . . .

For those of us who haven’t scored front row tickets to Mathew Williamson’s show or who are still sitting pretty waiting for an invite to Henry’s after show party, fear not as there are several other things going on in the city in celebration of London Fashion Week.

Here are my top 5 favourite things to do during LFW ’10 . . .

  1. Afternoon tea at the Berkeley – aptly called ‘Prêt-á-Portea’, the menu has been inspired by the A/W ’09 fashion collections. Why not try the Mulberry ‘Bayswater’ white chocolate and coconut truffle bag or the Roger Vivier chocolate ‘over the knee’ boot biscuit (available daily from 1pm – 6pm)
  2. Pop to Selfridges for a new signature lippie – Rimmel has opened its first pop-up shop in London’s busiest store and it coincides with the launch of their new Colour Show Off lipstick. The campaign is fronted by newcomer Georgia (if only our lips pouted like hers) Jagger and the temporary stand will be up until mid March
  3. Topshop rocks fashion week – live catwalk screenings of the shows, DJ, pop-up bakery, nail salon and blogging workshop – you name it Green’s got it covered. All available at the flagship Oxford Circus store daily.
  4. Oh! You Pretty Things is a must see exhibition for fashion photography fans at Liberty. Held in the 4th floor exhibition space, enjoy an afternoon with the new generation of British fashion photographers including Josh Olins and Alice Hawkins. Running until March 14 during store opening hours.
  5. Champagne Darlings! – after a long day of hitting the shops, head to the Mayfair for a well deserved cocktail. Try ‘Destination Fashion Flight’ – a trio of cocktails inspired by leading fashion capitals, Milan, London and Amsterdam (£25).
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
February 11th, 2010 by Chris McCrudden

In Memoriam: Alexander McQueen

As of today, Britain is a less creative place, as we learn the awful news that Alexander McQueen has died at the age of 40.

So before the full three-ring media circus rolls into town, and the gossip-mongers, sensationalists and those who think posting :-( on Twitter is an acceptable simulacrum for grief, take over the story, let’s remember why he was great in the first place.

The term “enfant terrible” was often bandied about when McQueen’s name was mentioned. This is usually a backhanded compliment aimed at people who are all mouth and no trousers, but in McQueen’s case he quite literally rose to fame by reinventing the trouser. His ‘bumster’, the trouser for wannabe flashers everywhere, was derided at the time but appeared just before hip-hop, emo and other street looks sent  the waistline hurtling south.

Aside from the occasional shock tactics, however, McQueen’s work as a couturier and designer was startling and beautiful. He took the staid perfection of the Saville Row tailor and blended it with the same feel for the absurd and theatrical that made Vivienne Westwood and John Galliano so successful. Some of his most recent work includes the ‘Alien’ shoes that Lady GaGa teeters around on in the video for Bad Romance.

It was this synthesis of wildness tempered with discipline that made his work so exciting. And what we’ll sorely miss.

Alexander McQueen, best collections

R.I.P. Alexander McQueen. We hope you rest in peace.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
February 9th, 2010 by Chris McCrudden

A passion for fashion

New York Fashion Week kicks off this Thursday and out there in the Big Apple right now, the tussle among fashionistas for catwalk show tickets probably makes a rugby scrum look like a corps de ballet.

Nowhere outside of the royal courts of 19th century Europe do seating plans matter more. The closer you are to the front, the closer you are to God. Or, more accurately, to the designer’s celebrity muse, who increasingly wears their most bankable new design because she gets more publicity than the clothes ever do.

Fashion blogger Bryanboy’s Twitter stream is probably the best introduction to the Byzantine intrigues required to bag a front row place at a show. Yet what’s most interesting about all this is why it should still matter when these supposedly exclusive shows are all over the internet.

Burberry Menswear 2010

Luxury fashion brands like Gucci and Dior might be latecomers to the online table (and even they’ll probably only eat a cube of cheese), but their YouTube channels do something very clever. They increase the visibility of products most of us will never touch without making them feel cheap or overexposed. Online video is cheaper than 20 pages of ads in Vogue, reaches more people and extends the lifespan of what are monstrously expensive half hour junkets.

But more important than all of this – it’s not the same as being there. This kind of online promotion doesn’t replace the experience, it whets your appetite for the real thing, and pushes up the demand for catwalk show tickets up to feverish levels.

High fashion still has a lot to learn about doing business, but it can teach businesses a lot of things about desire. And desire is what makes people confuse want with need and reach for their credit cards.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]