Visit speed website Speed blog home
October 18th, 2010 by Helen Beavis

Daybreak or give us a break?

Taking a big slice of column inches over the last month has been the slow demise of Daybreak.  And still it goes on.  So, is it really the end of the line for the unsultry duo, or just a question of implementing some quick & clever reputation-building tactics?

Jon Horsley gives a number of suggestions for how ITV could save the ailing show but none that actually focus on ITV sticking by its guns and putting plan in place to bolster its own PR efforts.  Typically, we’re quick to put the boot in to anything or anyone given a big fanfare.  But knowing how the UK media works, ITV’s PR machine surely has a plan in place for such an issue?

You’d hope so but as yet there doesn’t seem to be much sign?

So, here are a couple of suggestions for trying to change perception with what they’ve got rather than throwing the baby out with the bath water:

  1. Harness the audience: ITV needs to change the conversation by working with the viewing fans it does have.  He who shouts loudest
  2. Amplify the content: It’s an entertainment breakfast show and we know there’s an audience eager to consume.  Better pre-promotion of content (and better content) to the right audience in the right places
  3. Re-build the personalities: TV demands great stories so build great stories around the personalities so people get a chance to get to know them better.  Tell them what they’re like rather than allowing people to perceive who they think they might be.

What do you think?  Is Daybreak a show that can be turned around?

Enhanced by Zemanta
July 9th, 2010 by Chris McCrudden

From GMTV to WTF

GMTV
Image via Wikipedia

What does the word Daybreak mean to you? No, it isn’t the final chapter in the Twilight series. (Incidentally, does anyone else think they should change the strapline for that film to ‘One girl’s choice necrophilia and bestiality’?). It’s the new name for the new look GMTV. A fresh, vibrant approach to early morning television fronted by Christine Bleakley and Adrian Chiles.

VOM.

Now I have to confess I was never a fan of GMTV. While TV-am gave us the starchy pleasures of Anne Diamond (before she started looking a bit like Ann Widdecombe) and Wincey Willis, GMTV brought us little more than the  Fiona ‘don’t give your child the MMR vaccine’ Philips, and made stars of Eamonn Holmes, Tony Blair and Dr bleeding Hillary. Yes, Lorraine Kelly has been consistently marvellous. But this  is only for the baffling ‘Instant Glam’ makeovers she runs every Christmas where Sue, 38, a systems analyst from Barking is larded with sparkly eyeshadow and shoehorned into a sequinned batswing blouse.

So perhaps it’s no surprise that ITV, now the sole owner of GMTV after it bought Disney’s stake out last year (I’m assuming they no longer thought there was an animated feature in the Penny Smith story), wanted to refresh the format. After all that set’s been around since Anneka Rice was running around with a mobile phone the size of a washing machine strapped to her back, so it’s hardly breakfast telly for the iPhone generation.

But DAYBREAK!? Yes, the name has those vague, optimistic leanings that bad ad executives mistake for engagement, but that sans serif typeface and the purple colour scheme mean you couldn’t pass a Swedish crispbread between this brand identity and a chain of cheap motorway hotels. Mind you, the whiff of a Welcome Break just off the M6 might be just the right thing to reignite the kind of seedy sexual chemistry that kept British viewers grimly glued to breakfast television during the Anne and Nick years.

Oh, GMTV, you have consistently under-delivered and long may you do so. You don’t innovate, you mug the mid-market and year after year you convince the women of Britain that NEXT is worth shopping in. But nobody wants excitement at breakfast-time. And if they did, they wouldn’t be watching you.

Enhanced by Zemanta