Visit speed website Speed blog home
October 24th, 2011 by Rebecca Gregory

Can charities use social media to raise money?

 

Facebook logo

Image via Wikipedia

Research into how US charities are using Facebook, which was announced last week, found that only 0.4% of them have raised more than $100,000 from Facebook, 32% had raised less than $1,000 and 52% weren’t actually on Facebook.

These stats have given rise to debate in the UK over how the third sector uses Facebook and social media as a whole. One point has been that Facebook doesn’t have an inbuilt mechanism for donations and that a large fan base is pointless if the charity has to drive them to an external site. The response from some parties (particularly John Brunsdon writing for The Guardian last Friday) has been that there are Facebook apps available for donating via the social networking site and the charities need to be more tech savvy and find them, as well as collaborate on what they are doing in this space.

Every charity has its own diverse range of donor profiles that it needs to reach, which is what makes fundraising so challenging. It is also what requires fundraisers to keep one leg firmly in ‘traditional’ communications and the other bravely stepping into the world of social media. From my own experiences at Macmillan I am continually surprised at the number of fundraisers that aren’t email savvy, let alone engaging with charity via Facebook or twitter. Of course, a high proportion of donors/fundraisers are fairly switched on, but when you live in the online world it’s easy to forget that not everyone else is (even if you think they should be). The fact that not all donors have handily moved online is perhaps what has held some charities back from fully engaging in social media.

Regardless of sector, it can be daunting for any organisation to make an entrance online. Rather than an ad hoc foray onto Facebook, twitter or blogging any organisation needs to have a strategy; without a plan for growing a fan base and driving traffic to relevant websites there will be little reward.

It’s undeniable that social media is a fantastic means for charities to reach multiple audiences, bring supporters and fundraisers together, and be far more interactive with its donors. As a consequence, this can drive participation in fundraising events and fans and followers to donate. Yet to achieve this, some questions need to be asked beforehand to ensure the move online delivers:

-       Which of the donor audiences profiles do the different social media platforms reach

-       What information will be communicated to them

-       What is the communication style

-       How will online donations via social media be tracked? (If using an App, does it allow the charity to track what event and location the donation came from?)

For charities, a consumer’s positive experience of their ‘online brand’ may well prove to be the difference between clinching them as a life-long supporter for the charity, or not. In his article, John Brunsdon makes the valid point that there needs to be collaboration if charities are going to reap the rewards of social media. This is why I’m looking forward to the nicely timed mediaPro Expo next week (on twitter here) – where the likes of Breast Cancer Care, Breakthrough Breast Cancer and WWF will be sharing their online work. Most pertinently, Breast Cancer Care will be talking about how they used social media to raise money. I look forward to seeing you there!

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
April 12th, 2011 by Flora Turner

Social Media Savvy?

PR is changing as the ways in which we communicate expand. PR practitioners are arming themselves with the skill sets and the tools to ensure that they are, if not ahead of, are at least not far behind, the pack and this has never been more pertinent than with the rise of social media. Most of us have jumped straight in there with company blogs, LinkedIn, Twitter accounts, Facebook pages, personalised YouTube channels and all other permutations on the online communications theme. It comes as no surprise that we want to take our Clients on this journey of discovery too but when it means additional budget, time and resource – the holy trinity of all things negative in “Client speak”  – this isn’t an easy task.

Yesterday the CIPR Social Media Conference went some way to address this very modern PR dilemma.  The speakers were all top of their game and fascinating in their approach to social media.

Digital Media Manager, Thomas Knorpp from Sainsbury’s revealed a refreshingly laid back approach, choosing quality over quantity in terms of who they responded to, aiming to start solving people’s problems and creating interesting content instead of the usual message monologue big brands adopt as their ‘strategy’.

ASDA’s Head of Corporate Comms, Dominic Burch revealed they had chosen a ‘suck it and see’ approach where as a company they encouraged all staff to get involved and monitor the result – a bold move for a company of its size. As Dominic put it, “It’s only a mistake if you make it twice” – a phrase I shall certainly be repeating again.

The million dollar question of the day was; “What’s the best way to analyse and present the results of social media to your Client…?” The answer, disappointingly, was that there are no quick fixes!

You get what you pay for and while free tools such as Google Analytics, Twilert and Nutshell Mail offer a rudimentary overview, you really need to invest in a good bespoke tool for an accurate analysis if you are going to start taking social media seriously. Luckily, here at Speed, we’ve invested in SM2. This is arguably the best in the monitoring tool in the business and yes, while you do need to invest a little time setting up your searches the effort to gain ratio is more than satisfactory.

Myself and my attending colleagues all left with our heads buzzing with a renewed vigour and respect for the power of social media. Interesting, yes; insightful, absolutely; but without the reassurance of a definitive value attached – whether that be in line with comforting AVE figures or even a way to monitor ‘intent’ to purchase – the struggle to justify additional budget, time and resource with Clients of a certain nature continues…

Enhanced by Zemanta
March 2nd, 2010 by Chris Measures

Multi-channel communication? Marketing Fail

I had some great news on Friday – my final results for my Chartered Institute of Marketing (CIM) Diploma came through in the post.

I scraped a pass in the final module, meaning after 18 months study I’m now a ‘proper’ marketer.

However imagine my surprise when a couple of hours later I had an email from CIM telling me that my results were now online. But (and rather a big one this) “due to an unprecedented flow of web traffic to our site“, I may not be able to access them. I could telephone during business hours, but “our lines are very busy and there may be a delay in answering your call.”

Luckily I’d already got my results through in the post but imagine the frustration of anyone still waiting. Your potential life-changing results are there, but you can’t get them. Given one of the major topics on the course was integrating multi-channel communications and being able to predict web demand surely it is time for the CIM to practice what it teaches…………

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]