Visit speed website Speed blog home
September 18th, 2012 by

Mobile and retail: A teenage relationship

Sitting comfortably? Got a tea or coffee? Then i’ll begin…

 

Mobile and retail: like two newly acquainted teenagers fumbling around in the dark, don’t fully understand each other yet.

We’re not just talking about mobile commerce from afar here; we’re talking about using mobile in a store to shop around. Consumers using mobile for retail opportunities isn’t a new concept. People have been using their phones while on the high street to check prices and products for a few years now, but it’s only now it’s starting to boom and now that retailers are trying to catch up.

 

In August The Guardian ran a piece by OgilvyAction MD of Digital, Simon Stebbing, looking at some research it conducted around mobile behaviour and touched on retail. The research (surveying 1000 UK consumers) revealed that women are more likely than men, to use a mobile dedicated mobile site rather than an app for purchases on mobile.

 

Having a mobile dedicated site should be a no-brainer for any retailer. Consumers have a device in their pocket that can connect to the internet from pretty much anywhere, which means that there’s the potential to buy something….from pretty much anywhere. If a retailer has a website, then it should have a dedicated mobile site, but research performed earlier in the year by leading mobile marketing agency Somo (a Speed client) on the IMRG/Hitwise Top 100 Online Retailers, indicated that only 57% of them had a dedicated mobile website.

Somo’s research also uncovered that 43% of those retailers had no iPhone app and 63% had no app for Android devices and considering Android has a market share of around 50% in the UK, that’s a massive missed opportunity.

 

It’s interesting to see according to the OgilvyAction piece, retailers appear to prefer a mobile website over an app. The reason for this becomes a little more apparent when you consider that according to the research the ‘majority’ of smartphone users (56% of women and 51% of men) surveyed were Blackberry users (21% of women with a smartphone and 15% of men).

The app ecosystem on a Blackberry is a long way off that of Apple or Android devices and so using a mobile site is probably a much better user experience. Interestingly, the UK is one of RIM’s last remaining strongholds and typically is with a demographic that historically, wasn’t part of Blackberry’s DNA: teenagers.

 

From the research, it seems that women are a bit savvier than men when it comes to shopping around on mobile when out on the high street, with just under half of women browsing competitor sites while in a store. I’m not going to relist the interesting parts of the research here, but instead talk about how retailers should react.

 

Over in the US, the practice of shopping around via your mobile while in a store has been coined as ‘showrooming’. Basically using the store as a, you guessed it, a ‘showroom’, which is straight forward enough and it’s something a lot of people have been doing for years.

 

We’ve all been there. We’ve all done it. I remember doing this a couple of years ago when looking for a new TV. I went to a big  electrical, high street chain to check out what different TVs looked like and how they measured up both in terms of physical size and attributes. While in the store I had used my mobile to do  a little price-comparison research on my TV of choice, so I knew roughly what I wanted and the different prices I could get it for. In the process of doing this I had probably three different store workers come up to me to ask if I was ok. They knew what I was doing on my phone, they had seen me typing away, taking pictures and scanning barcodes but they just couldn’t really do anything about it.

 

The only time I asked for a store assistant’s help was to see what the movement was around price, so that I could walk out of the store that afternoon with my TV of choice that afternoon (waiting for delivery is such a pain). The store wasn’t prepared to move on price at all, or, as I suggested, bundle in something like a surround system at a bit of a discount, or provide any other incentive for me. I really was trying my best to give them ways for me to justify handing over my cash. The only sensible option I had was to walk away with the retailer having no real idea what i had been looking at and where, with no real opportunity to take any action about it But today it needn’t be like this.

 

Short of confiscating phones at the door, retailers can’t stop people using their phones to browse elsewhere. Instead of trying to block phone signal in store and create a black-out zone, retailers should be embracing technology to help turn ‘showrooming’ in to something they can benefit from, turning any threats in to potential opportunities.

 

Retailers have been spending the last five or so years trying to get their heads around mobile and it seems that after the app boom, some of them are falling a little out of love with apps after not seeing enough of a return on their investment in terms of money, footfall or engagement. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing. It means that some retailers will no longer just pump out an app without thinking, just to tick a box. They’ve realised that it needs careful planning and strategic thought to make it work. They’ve realised that mobile can’t be a quick fix, it needs to be an integrated part of their marketing efforts and that perhaps an app isn’t the most effective way  to address a mobile audience.

 

When someone is searching for something on a mobile device, it’s usually something that’s time relevant and access speed is extremely important. This means that it’s a search for something that’s relevant at a certain time and that there are specific details around the search and because it’s all on the move, the quicker the results can be delivered, the better. With that in mind, something simple like providing free, secured Wi-Fi customers can connect to could be a great way for retailers to provide customers with a quicker way of searching the web. From a retailers point of view it could also provide them with a channel to communicate to customers and provide them with an incentive to buy in store, not to mention a way of gathering valuable analytical data to enhance a customer’s experience.

 

Wi-Fi technology has been around for ages and yet it’s rarely seen in retailers, aside from coffee shops and there’s no reason why this should be the case. There’s a wealth of technology available that retailers should be considering implementing but this can’t be about limiting a customer’s experience through technology but more about using it to influence and engage with them. Less about how they can stop consumers doing ‘x’ and ‘y’ and more about how they can encourage them. If a customer walks in to a store, looks around while using their mobile, the retailer has no idea who that person is, what they’re really looking for or why they decided to leave.

There’s a famous cartoon by Peter Steiner that was published in The New Yorker in 1993 that had the caption, “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.” The same sort of thing could be said about the details retailers know about consumers coming in to their store and then leaving.

 

"On the high street, nobody realises you're a dog until they ask"

 

Come on retailers, let’s see you really do something innovative with technology and not just stand back and watch the pound signs walk out the door.

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
April 16th, 2012 by

Testing the latest tech at The Gadget Show Live 2012

This weekend I attended The Gadget Show Live at the National Exhibition Centre. Inspired by the Channel 5 programme, it’s the UK’s largest consumer technology exhibition and lets visitors have some hands on fun with the very latest and upcoming technology. Here’s my top five from across the halls:

1. JCDecaux – future of outdoors advertising

This set of cutting edge advertisements included a McCain’s jacket potato bill board which regularly sprayed the scent of freshly baked potatoes at unsuspecting passers-by before distributing vouchers from the base. This reminded me of the artificial chocolate smell pumped out by M&Ms World just across from Speed’s offices, designed to lure shoppers in. This exhibit also featured an interactive advert which you can ‘explore’ with your hand movements.

2. NeuroSky – mind-powered toys and tools

NeuroSky were demonstrating technology that responds to brainwave impulses, including a ping pong ball assault course. With the use of a headset the player can alter the air levels to guide the ball through the obstacle course by increasing and decreasing mental concentration accordingly. The technology senses electrical brainwaves and processes them into digital signals which power the use of games, computers and ‘investigational medical applications’.

3. O2 – NFC ‘Treats on Tap’ and ‘Wallet’

O2 were showing off an NFC (Near Field Communication) vending machine which allowed certain smartphone handsets to make touchless payment for goodies. Also on show was the forthcoming app ‘O2 Wallet’ which brings mobile money payments, online shopping/comparison (like the Amazon iPhone app) and location-based and user-tailored offers, into one place. After some delays, the app is currently being piloted and is due to launch soon.

4. Using the force with Star Wars Kinect

Using the XBox Kinect console, which replaces traditional hand-controller for body recognition gameplay, the new Star Wars game allows players to manipulate the force, wield light-sabers and captain spacecraft – with your own movements. A geek’s dream come true!

5. Super Theatre

Hosted by The Gadget Show TV presenters, the show featured explosive stunts, challenges and in true Gadget Show style, an epic competition which set chosen tweeting audience members against one another in an epic battle on stage. Too many lasers, robots and flying machines to mention, but a great way to round off the jam-packed line up!

Enhanced by Zemanta
March 26th, 2012 by

Draw your own conclusions

Last week Zynga announced it had bought OMGPOP Studios, developers of the latest must-have app, Draw Something, for around $200m.

When you take a look at Draw Something’s numbers, it seems that OMGPOP should have held out longer and for a lot more money and that Zynga got a bargain.  While I don’t disagree that OMGPOP could have got more money, overall I think it was the right call, given the turbulent and unpredictable nature of App Store success and the potential longevity of Draw Something.

 

From much of the reporting, you’d be forgiven for thinking that Draw Something is an overnight phenomenon, but in actual fact OMGPOP launched the web version of Draw Something (Draw My Thing) over a year ago.  It’s not until the game hit mobile that it blossomed and since then, it’s had some truly extraordinary numbers, as Business Insider has reported:

  • The app is six weeks old
  • Top app in 79 countries
  • Downloaded over 35 million times
  • Generating £250k of revenue per day

 

There’s no doubt these are fantastic numbers, generating $250k of revenue per day is astonishing, but it’s when Business Insider talks about the time it took for Draw Something to reach 1 million users that when you look in to it, a different story emerges:

  • It took AOL nine years to hit 1 million users
  • It took Facebook nine months
  • It took Draw Something nine days.

 

Obviously you have to look at all this in perspective. To me this isn’t just down to the success of the app, but the mass adoption of mobile. Smartphone adoption in the UK is around 60% at the moment Draw Something is a new app yes, but as a game, it’s been around online for over a year. It wasn’t until it launched on iPhone and Android that it really took off.

 

This is less about an app and more about the power of mobile. Obviously when you hark back to the days of Freeserve and AOL, it naturally took longer to acquire users, but as more of the world came online, the process naturally quickened. By the time Facebook rolled around in its initial closed form, it took considerably less time but was still reliant on fixed web (PC/laptop) access. The Draw Something app was able to hit a million users in less than nine days simply due to the mobile effect. If you want to reach the highest number of potential users in the shortest amount of time, the most effective medium is mobile.

 

To put this in to perspective:

 

The same piece from Business Insider, also reveals that Draw Something took about five weeks to hit 20 million downloads, which actually means that it hit 15 million downloads in one week, which is a huge accomplishment. However Angry Birds is a force unto itself and i can only imagine the latest iteration of the franchise to hit 20 million before the week mark. The Angry Birds phenomenon is….well just that really and for Rovio to be talking theme parks now is just astonishing.

 

All this takes me back to my original point about taking a deal when it comes to apps. The apps ecosystem is so unpredictable and inconsistent for the most part that today’s success story is far from being guaranteed tomorrow. If you haven’t read Chris Steven’s book ‘Appillionaires’, I would really, really recommend it, as it outlines just how difficult it is to make money from apps and delves into the how the very few developers that have made their fortune, did so and how a rather substantial part of it was just right place, right time and a healthy dollop of luck.

 

For OMGPOP’s Founder, Charles Forman, given the fact it’s reported he had around $1,800 in his bank account before selling to Zynga and now his stake in the company is apparently worth “way more than $22m”, it’s a case 36th time lucky and a good time to take the cash in my opinion.

 

Congrats to all at OMGPOP.

Enhanced by Zemanta
November 8th, 2011 by

Retailers must be mobile

Last night was Mobile Monday London’s sixth birthday event at London’s glamorous Centre Point. There were some familiar faces there last night and it was great to be back at a MoMo event, especially one that given the line up of speakers and topics, promised to deliver.

 

Martyn Warwick, from Telecom TV chaired the session with Russell Buckley (@russellbuckley) from Eagle Eye Solutions (client of Speed), Mark Curtis (@fjordmark) from Fjord, David Wood (@DW2) from Accenture and Mike Short from Telefonica all providing their answers to some of the big questions in mobile.

 

Some of those big questions seemed to centre around the death of things…perhaps a little morbid, but it was the conversations on privacy, trust, location and retail that took my particular interest. Much of the industry seems to be concerned about the decline and re-birth of different industries, which is i think only natural. After all, these cycles present a variety of different business opportunities.

 

I’ve heard all of these guys talk at MoMoLo and elsewhere before and although that everyone on the panel last night made some very interesting and valid points…i think that Mark and Russell always provide some fantastic food for thought.

 

I always come out of a MoMo session with a load of notes and thoughts, so I thought that instead of one massive blog post, I’d break it down in to maybe three shorter ones on different topics. So here goes, first up – retail.

 

Live or let die?


If a major high-street retailer doesn’t have a mobile offering today, something I can go to, download, view now, then it could already be too late. Mobile moves at such a rapid pace – evident to see from the recap of the last six years of events since MoMoLo started – that by the time it takes to act on something, it’s already out of date.

 

Five years ago there was no such thing as an iPhone and it was only a very slight minority that were using WAP on their phone to search the web, download JAVA and J2ME apps. Five years in retail never used to be *that* long of a time. In mobile, five years is a lifetime. As mobile commerce is increasing, retailers need to be quicker at adapting otherwise there’s a big risk that consumers leave them behind.

 

Interestingly, econsultancy recently published some stats around retailers and mobile offerings, concluding that:

  • 36 of the top 47 retailers on the list have either a mobile optimised website or a smartphone app.
  • 21 of the 47 have both sites and apps.
  • 9 have just apps, while 6 have a mobile site and no apps.

 

Russell made an interesting point that even when a retailer has a mobile offering and drives a consumer to the store, the battle isn’t won yet. Retailers are competing in their own stores for that consumer to make a purchase – 21% of consumers that own a smartphone have changed their mind about purchasing a product in store as a result of information gathered on their device. Retailers are failing to make the sale even with the consumer there with the product, hand in pocket. But the hand isn’t on their cash; it’s on their mobile.

 

Russell rounded up by concluding that it’s a fact that a lot of digital marketing techniques have passed many retailers by as they’ve never really invested in digital marketing. Many retailers out there are just not geared up for mobile thinking yet, but they have to be as they’re about to go through absolutely massive changes just as the music, publishing and many other industries have.

 

Mark went as far to say that a lot of retail looks dead already. I think that in some ways he’s right, but arguably it’s in retail that a lot of the action and opportunity is right now. Some retailers have made significant effort towards mobile and continue to reap the benefits, Amazon for example is always, always my default choice to check prices, availability etc. and I’ll continue to give them my custom as they provide exceptional service. There are however many others using mobile very well such as Tesco, Ocado and Argos to name a couple.

 

Mark went on to say that retailers who don’t now accept that mobile is very much part of their business are in big trouble and that high street retailers should be looking at making their stores in to experiences rather than just a place to hold and sell stock. Something that Steve Jobs evangelised when the first Apple Store opened in 2001.

In the last 10 years Apple Stores across the globe have provided that ‘Apple experience’ that make visiting a store actually quite an enjoyable experience even when you don’t have anything particular to buy. How many other stores can you name that have a similar effect? I’m struggling to name any other that offers a consumer something similar. Any suggestions?

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
October 17th, 2011 by

How long did the world just spend upgrading to iOS5? Almost 1m years

Today Apple announced that 4m iPhone 4S’ were sold in the opening three days of being on sale. Not only this, but around 25m people upgraded to iOS5. The sales figures were double that of the iPhone 4 opening weekend of sales, but i just wanted to look a little more at that iOS5 update number.

 

If you take out sales of new iPhones it means that there were 21m downloads of iOS5 since it launched. Naturally with 21m people rushing to try and download the latest update, Apple’s servers had a few well publicised problems handling the number of requests. After everything calmed down a bit and i began the upgraded process and encountered the following necessary downloads:

 

  1. A 900mb iTunes update
  2. A 700mb iOS5 update
  3. A 700mb iOS5 iPad update

 

I can hear my internet connection groaning as it starts nibble away at the data…

 

It did get me thinking though.

 

Taking out the iPad update – just how long did the world spend updating their iPhones to iOS5?

 

Prepare for some very rough calculations….

 

According to Mashable the world’s average internet connection speed is 580kbps or roughly 580KBps (about 0.07MB/second – hat tip to Matt Brian from TNW). Right so that’s a good starting point.

 

The rough file size of the two updates (iTunes and iOS5) is 1600mb. The second starting piece.

 

Here goes…

1600 / 0.07  = 22,857

On average it took 22,857 seconds to download the two files to upgrade…..this is just the download, so doesn’t include the time it takes to back up your iPhone/transfer purchases etc.

 

(22,857 X 21,000,000)/60 = 480,000,000,000 seconds

480,000,000,000 /60 = 8,000,000,000 minutes

(8,000,000,000 / 24) /365 =  913,242 years.

 

So if my napkin calculations are correct. Not only did 21m people upgrade to iOS 5 since it launched on 12 October, but they collectively spent roughly 913,242 YEARS doing it……is that right?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
July 13th, 2011 by

Facebook launch one app to rule them all…well Java phones at least

Facebook Every Phone app

 

Yesterday Facebook announced the launch of its ‘Every Phone’ app that will provide users of feature phones (read non-smartphones) with a unified experience of Facebook. It’s no real surprise that Facebook’s done this although it may have a few people smacking their foreheads, remembering the obvious.

 

Over the last couple of years in Western Europe and the US, the mobile industry has been about smartphones – particularly Apple and Android devices. While Facebook has addressed this market extremely well (but I’m still waiting for a Facebook iPad app, so pull your finger out), the feature phone market,  consisting of hundreds of millions, if not billions of people across the globe, which have largely been forgotten.

 

Through it’s own statistics, Facebook recognises it has over 250million registered users accessing Facebook through their mobile and these users are twice as active as non-mobile users. Being a company that’s always thinking, Facebook’s also counted for this. As part of the ‘Every Phone’ app, Facebook has teamed up with a number of network operators around the world to give people that download the app 90 days free data. What a fantastic move. Genius!

 

You might be wondering if people outside of Europe and the US actually use Facebook all that much. 70% of Facebook users come from outside of the US and Indonesia has the second highest number of users in the world, with India coming in at number three.

 

So while the Western world holds its gaze on iPhones and Androids, this move from Facebook may well catch their eye, even if for only a second and remind them that there are billions of phones out there that aren’t iPhone or Android devices and you should be providing a service for them too.

Here’s a video run down of Every App

 

Well done Facebook. Now about that iPad app…

 

 

June 29th, 2011 by

CyberMummy11

For the past few months my inbox has been getting filled with reminders about CyberMummy 2011, which took place on Saturday 25th June.

For those of you who don’t know about CyberMummy it is the UK’s conference for Mummy (and Daddy) bloggers – the opportunity for them to come together for workshops designed to help them with their blog writing as well as giving them a chance to meet one another outside of their virtual worlds.

I arrived at 8am whilst the other Sponsors were setting up and stood watching as the queue began to unfold. Once the doors opened you could feel the excitement in the air as each attendee let out a sigh of relief that the day they had been waiting for had finally arrived.

A lot of the mums I spoke with were having a much needed break from their normal day to day home life. Some spoke of their apprehension from being away from their children, whilst others bashfully exclaimed of their shyness at having been out of the social pool for so long.

Product after product of baby friendly brands were grasped by eager hands in the form of goody bags and standalone items.

After the first initial hour of meeting and greeting and parents making their way across the company in brand sponsored cars and luxurious hotels the first speeches of the day kicked off at 9.30am. After a rapturous applause for the events founders Lord Richard Allan, Facebook’s Director of Policy, kicked off the conference with the topic ‘Working with Facebook: the power of social web’.

He handled questions from the floor well, especially when asked about privacy and content ownership where he not only reassured all there present that Facebook would never reveal their contact details or sell off their images.

The second key note speaker, and the one most people were there to see, was Sarah Brown, the wife to former Prime minister – Gordon Brown. Active in charity work and the founder of PiggyBankKids she took the floor to a wave of applause and flashes of photography where she discussed her work and spoke of the launch of her new book ‘Behind the Black door’.

There were four workshops throughout the day covering everything from working with brands and making money using your blog to SEO and the basics of a well designed blog with writing tips thrown in for good measure. I’m not surprised that those attendees present were like giddy school girls. I have never met a nicer, more welcoming group of individuals who not only understand their need within their community but the power they hold when it comes to brands.

There were some really inspiring individuals from the speakers to the friends I made throughout my time there. And whilst the insight into mummy bloggers grow and grow so does their power within consumer brands and the expansion of their following.

Enhanced by Zemanta
May 9th, 2011 by

Technology dominates the most powerful Brand Index

Millward Brown’s most recent brand index has placed six technology companies in the top 10, with Apple taking the top spot from Google. Apple is now valued at £93bn (a rise of 84%), whilst Google is valued at $111.5bn (a drop of 2%).

 

Apple’s strong brand value will not come as a surprise to many people. Us media types are usually found walking through Central London clutching on to iPhones, or if we are feeling especially important that day, an iPad. These two products have been Apple’s major successes in recent years, allowing the brand to appeal to a consumer market and an enterprise market simultaneously. They have essentially done this by making their products really cool and really useful at the same time – or at least giving us enough of an argument to convince our IT managers that we simply can’t live without an iPhone, other PR agencies would surely mock us if we turned up with a, god forbid, Nokia.

 

Google on the other hand have had a year of crisis after crisis. The campaigners for data privacy always seem to end up at the door of Google and have such hurt their brand image. They now appear to be the evil company that they are, having managed to keep the ‘funky start-up’ image going for far longer than deserved. However, a 2% drop isn’t exactly crisis times. They are still seen as a company pushing technological innovation – their work with Twitter during the Egypt crisis was a massive coup for the brand name in that respect.

 

The other interesting mover in the index is Facebook, which made its debut in the top 100 at 35; achieving the highest increase in brand value at 246 percent. I am sure that next year we will see Facebook sore into the top 20, if not the top 10, as Google, Facebook and Apple continue to be the technology brands making the most noise. I am sare that Microsoft and IBM will forever be a permanent fixture in the top 10 but it these three that dominate our consciousness.

Enhanced by Zemanta
March 11th, 2011 by

Thoughts on LinkedIn Today

LinkedIn TodayThe launch of LinkedIn Today is an interesting development. It produces a dashboard of popular news stories, based on the articles and blog posts that have been most shared by people on the social networking site.

Articles are filtered into sections, such as Retail, Financial Services, Telecommunications, and IT, based on what news has been most shared by people working in a particular industry. This is handy if you want to find out what the hot topics in a specific sector are at any given moment.

Currently some of the news channels feature articles that aren’t relevant to that specific sector, as general interest stories, such as the earthquake in Japan, are shared by people from all industries. I imagine LinkedIn will develop the service in the coming weeks so that news, which isn’t relevant to a certain industry, is not displayed in that industry’s channel. I also wouldn’t be surprised if LinkedIn added a geographic filter to news channels so that you can view the most shared news in a specific region.

Since launching this morning, many of the channels have already acquired a few thousand followers. This will no doubt have a sizeable impact on the level of traffic that news sites receive when their articles are included on the site. This could see more publications adding LinkedIn’s sharing button to their websites in a bid to encourage people to share news on the social network, and in doing so, drive traffic back to their website.

What’s also interesting, is that you can follow a few select news sources and see which stories have been most shared. I’d love to see how this compares with the likes of Facebook and Twitter. Do people share different types of news on different sites? Considering that the way that I use Facebook, compared to Twitter or LinkedIn, I reckon we’d see some big differences in the news stories that are shared most on each network. What do you think?

January 31st, 2011 by

Log off and sit back – seriously, try it

Tim Weber’s article ‘Davos 2011:We’re all hyper-connect, now what?’ poses many interesting questions. I’m sure there is the potential here to be clever and pick up on the loss of control for brands etc., but what struck me was the pace of the article. Weber sounded rushed and as I read the article I to found myself becoming tense.

Undoubtedly we’re on the move, contactable and engaged 24/7. For businesses, mobile devices represent the biggest opportunity to do more, more, more than ever before. But for consumers it’s exhausting! We’re all so busy being ‘available’ that we’ve been fooled into thinking that tweets and messages on Facebook are productive and valuable signs of friendship. They might help connect us with a wider community and broaden our horizons – this is good – but if any friend thinks tweeting me (I refuse to join Facebook) for my big 30, or any birthday, is acceptable they can jog on.

My point isn’t that social media is bad, far from it, more that hyper-connectivity as Weber calls it, can mean we lose sight of what’s important. Some critics say the Internet is shutting us down, which if you ask me, is a load of old bollocks. But sometimes there is a lot to be said for putting down laptop/mac/iPad/smart phone, making a cup of tea, putting your feet up and disconnecting. And after reading the article on my iPhone, that’s exactly what I did. Bliss.

Enhanced by Zemanta