Visit speed website Speed blog home
December 2nd, 2009 by Clare English

The Price is right for Katie and Peter

I LOVE a good conspiracy theory! And my long suffering colleagues have heard enough of my latest, so in the spirit of preserving their sanity, it’s time I shared it with the rest of you.  Katie Price and Peter Andre; they split up right?  Really? I’ll try to keep this brief…

Consider the facts.  Or let Google trends do it for you.  Katie (red line on graph – for the purposes of quick illustration I’m not adding another variable by including the name ‘Jordan’, because it’s also a country etc), love her or hate her, is worth an estimated £50 million and has made her money almost exclusively from media deals, or other business ventures that have been driven by mass media exposure.

google trends

So, Katie marries Peter (blue line on graph) in 2005, who you can see from the search volume chart, has always had less search interest that Katie. There is interest for Peter, too. But they were such a celebrity ‘couple’ and largely featured in interviews together.  It may well have been annoying for him because he’s releasing his own music, was going on tour and might have been worried that people would think he’s just Katie’s puppet.  But hang on, if they ‘split up’ and promote a ‘team Katie Vs team Peter’ movement – particularly if Katie ensures that she’s disliked enough to turn the nation to team Peter – he’ll not only sell more than four albums, but they’ll BOTH get paid for media exclusives (because as much as the nation seemed to want to punish her in the recent ‘I’m a Celebrity…’ antics of late, we’re to involved by now to even consider not actually reading about Katie).

Ever wished that you could clone yourself to double your earning potential? Just look at what’s happened to our blue line here – it’s reaching up to meet the red one, and it’s quite possible that they might meet in the middle before long.  More interest in both individuals equals more income for each individual from media deals, equals an absolutely massive combined fortune.  And they’ve nothing to lose;  Katie has commendably managed to turn around her reputation from being the celeb that everyone loved to hate (circa 2002) once before, so she knows she can do it again (no doubt kicked off with a marathon interview with the pair of them spouting tales of forgiveness in OK!).

In my opinion, it’s either that, or they were never properly ‘together’.  But hats off – what a great business model. We may never learn if we’ve been deceived or not, but it’s certainly been entertaining.

July 1st, 2009 by Nick Bishop

Twitter imposters

One casualty of the Katie Price Peter Andre falling out has been Jordan lookalikes; the work has dried up. The celebrity impersonation business is fickle, a classic boom and bust industry. But it’s not too difficult to understand the industry’s appeal, even if it’s a little weird and demanding of our sympathy.

What’s weirder and completely beyond my comprehension is why the impersonation business has extended into the corporate world. Unless bent on being malicious, why would anyone want to pretend to be American Airlines? Or Exxon Mobil?
untitled

But should Exxon Mobil or American Airlines be troubled by this? Corporate twitter accounts are mostly dull; nothing more than another channel for spewing out company news. Their followers, I assume, are followers for self-interested reasons only. Taking lessons from Jordan might not be something you’d want to tell people about, but tolerating a slew of harmless impersonators is not a bad strategy for extending the reach of your brand.