Visit speed website Speed blog home
December 2nd, 2009 by Katie Swan

The end of free content?

The announcement that Google users will be limited as to the amount of news articles they can access for free signals a change in the way we will consume online content. Free vs paid for content is currently a big debate with an increasing number of publications opting to include a pay wall for their online material. As previously discussed in Free vs Fee: The Value Factor. This concession by Google means that internet users will only be able to access five pages of news a day from a paid-for publication before being asked to register or subscribe.

The internet generation are used to accessing content for free so may baulk at the idea of paying. But online publications aren’t pulling in advertising revenue like they used to so it’s no wonder there is an increase in those looking to charge for material.

However, those charging for content will need to offer something unique. It could be that a two-tier system emerges. Mass market media brands will opt for free content hoping for a large circulation to attract advertisers and other more specialist media will charge hoping that high quality specialist stories will attract subscribers. Whatever happens 2010 will see major changes in online content and the way it becomes available to us, with technology developments allowing us to consume more media content at a faster pace.

September 2nd, 2009 by Nick Bishop

My newsagent is closed

For the second day running, the newsagent at Hertford North train station hasn’t opened, meaning no Guardian and no FT to read on my way to work. With no book packed and a very limited mobile phone signal, I’ve had little choice but to read Metro. I am poorer for this experience.

The deliberately mediocre, appeal-to-all, Metro is no substitute for a paid-for newspaper. Neither is the free-to-all BBC. With a few exceptions, the brilliant World Tonight on Radio 4 for example, BBC News, certainly the flagship television news programmes, lacks depth and originality. It’s because it’s so bland that, unlike my colleague Stephen Waddington, I don’t think we should be worried about the BBC distorting the shape of media industry. The US media industry over the past twelve months has proved itself very capable of folding without the intervention of a state-funded news organisation.

News with analysis and opinion is a product worth paying for, whether in print or online. The big change for the newspaper industry will, I believe, come when Apple launches its tablet computer (heavily rumoured). I’m not an early adopter of technology but I’ll be among the first to buy this. And no longer will I have to put up with my newsagent mysteriously shutting up shop.
May 11th, 2009 by Claire Jones

Will charging for online content benefit the PR industry?

It cannot be ignored that both print and online publications rely heavily on an ad-based business model. However, as advertising is typically one of the first casualties of the recession, it is perhaps rather shrewd of Murdoch to raise the issue of charging for online content. The pros and cons were covered very well today in The Guardian, but many questions remain unanswered:

-    How can you make people charge for something that they are used to getting for free?
-    How will newspaper sites be able to compete with free sites like the BBC?

However, it is worth noting that people still pay for newspapers over the free dailies – so there is scope for co-existence. Perhaps the best model to look at is FT.com, whereby the user must pay for content after accessing a certain number of articles for free. WSJ also has a profitable pay-per-view model.

So, how can we as PRs benefit? Well let’s face it; it’s highly unlikely the average consumer will pay for content. It is more probable that the online pricing models will be geared towards business subscriptions – meaning more business content. Its my theory and I’m sticking to it….
blog-pic-final