Visit speed website Speed blog home
December 2nd, 2009 by Katie Swan

The end of free content?

The announcement that Google users will be limited as to the amount of news articles they can access for free signals a change in the way we will consume online content. Free vs paid for content is currently a big debate with an increasing number of publications opting to include a pay wall for their online material. As previously discussed in Free vs Fee: The Value Factor. This concession by Google means that internet users will only be able to access five pages of news a day from a paid-for publication before being asked to register or subscribe.

The internet generation are used to accessing content for free so may baulk at the idea of paying. But online publications aren’t pulling in advertising revenue like they used to so it’s no wonder there is an increase in those looking to charge for material.

However, those charging for content will need to offer something unique. It could be that a two-tier system emerges. Mass market media brands will opt for free content hoping for a large circulation to attract advertisers and other more specialist media will charge hoping that high quality specialist stories will attract subscribers. Whatever happens 2010 will see major changes in online content and the way it becomes available to us, with technology developments allowing us to consume more media content at a faster pace.

June 25th, 2009 by Nick Bishop

The Underpants Business

So much time has been spent trying to work out how to make online content pay. This clip from South Park quite brilliantly summarises the problem.


(Thanks to the Guardian’s Jemima Kiss for the link.)

May 11th, 2009 by Claire Jones

Will charging for online content benefit the PR industry?

It cannot be ignored that both print and online publications rely heavily on an ad-based business model. However, as advertising is typically one of the first casualties of the recession, it is perhaps rather shrewd of Murdoch to raise the issue of charging for online content. The pros and cons were covered very well today in The Guardian, but many questions remain unanswered:

-    How can you make people charge for something that they are used to getting for free?
-    How will newspaper sites be able to compete with free sites like the BBC?

However, it is worth noting that people still pay for newspapers over the free dailies – so there is scope for co-existence. Perhaps the best model to look at is FT.com, whereby the user must pay for content after accessing a certain number of articles for free. WSJ also has a profitable pay-per-view model.

So, how can we as PRs benefit? Well let’s face it; it’s highly unlikely the average consumer will pay for content. It is more probable that the online pricing models will be geared towards business subscriptions – meaning more business content. Its my theory and I’m sticking to it….
blog-pic-final