Visit speed website Speed blog home
October 25th, 2011 by nicole.hudspith

Football has come a long way since the 70’s…unlike The Daily Mail

I can’t sit here and deny that I don’t read the Daily Mail on my lunch breaks – I absolutely love removing myself from work for 15 minutes and reading about the insane lives of our celebs. It has little effect on my life but I like knowing where David and Victoria Beckham are and whether Jessica Simpson is pregnant (or just rounded). However, there have been times – most notably Stephen Gately’s death – when the Daily Mail has made me cringe, made me angry and made me utterly disgusted. And it’s done it again!

Patrice Evra, French football player

Image via Wikipedia

Anyone who knows me knows I would watch football every waking hour of the day if I could, and the issues surrounding the sport come hand-in-hand with the talent and skill displayed on the football pitch. Racism has, quite rightly, changed over the years and several campaigns are working hard to eliminate this from the game. Yet two incidents over the past couple of weeks have insinuated that racism is still firmly ensconced in the game of football. Patrice Evra accused Liverpool striker Luis Suarez of using a “certain word at least 10 times” when his side, Manchester United, were held to a 1-1 draw against the Merseyside club on 15 October. The other incident at the forefront of football news is allegations that Chelsea’s captain, John Terry, made racist remarks to QPR‘s Anton Ferdinand, which he denies.

So while the battle to tackle racism in football – and in society (as anyone who watched BBC2’s Mixed Britannia will see) – has made significant progress, it’s still clear there is some way to go. If the Daily Mail’s article yesterday on these recent football racism rows (Football might not be perfect but it’s come a long way since racism in the 1970s) is anything to go by, we should all be grateful that racism isn’t as aggressive as it once was and it’s okay to do it now as people apologise for it.

In a multi-cultural society, it is absolutely unacceptable that a British publication can possible say that “every club seems to be promoting a kick racism out of football campaign, beyond the point of boredom”. Even worse is to tell Patrice Evra and Anton Ferdinand that “perhaps in this case you could just put up with it and get on with the game”. The UK is still in search of complete acceptance of all races, all nationalities, etc., and articles like this are not going to get us there!

Enhanced by Zemanta
October 16th, 2009 by Nicky Savage

Points of View 2.0

For anyone that spends time monitoring their Tweetdeck, you might have witnessed the incredible powers of social media today around two major stories. I always check my feeds first thing in the morning on the train to work – I like to know how @jangles is feeling about his day, whether @ruskin147 has been out with the dogs before work and what the slightly less influential but equally interesting @rupinjapan has witnessed on his commute. Today, two major stories have been flying around social media networks – that of London Underground vs Old Man and the rather repulsive review of Stephen Gately’s death in the Mail

The first story is down to Jonathan MacDonald who captured a tirade of abuse from a London Underground worker at Holborn tube. The story is shocking and as the comments say, usually us Brits just turn a blind eye and carry on with our journeys. Not Jonathan. Jonathan captured the whole scene on film, blogged it and then sold in the story. He has been interviewed by nearly every broadcaster in the UK and has everyone commenting including Boris Johnson. This is a real example of people power. That staff member guy would usually have got away with it -he won’t this time and as a result, I am sure (hope) we can expect a change in service, especially considering the hike in travel prices.

The second story is about the foul piece by Jan Moir in The Daily Mail - a piece giving her views on the death of Stephen Gately. According to Jan, “He was the Posh Spice of Boyzone, a popular but largely decorous addition…The sugar coating on this fatality is so saccharine-thick that it obscures whatever bitter truth lies beneath…” and other such commentry. The ‘public’ is understandly fuming. Tweeters including @stephenfry and @perezhilton have commented in disgust and as a result, the title has changed and ads have been pulled from around the piece. Some are calling for an apology, others for dismissal.

It makes one feel quite powerful – if we don’t like something now, we can rally our networks to make something change. The views of the online community are increasingly being listened to and that is why it is fundamental that any organisation be it public or private needs to be monitoring online conversations. If London Underground had spoken to Jonathan the second he posted his piece, they might (or might not) have stopped him making it one of the big stories of today. But they didn’t and now they are in a whole heap of the brown stuff.