Visit speed website Speed blog home
March 25th, 2010 by Chris McCrudden

Back to the 90s – passive smoking

Trends are cyclical things. If it hangs around long enough, a product, idea or a person can have more than one shot at the zeitgeist. Provided everyone understands that between those two spells in the limelight are long periods spent hanging around in second-hand shops or bad dissertations, and doing summer seasons at Butlins.

For gauging whether something or someone’s time has come again I usually apply what I call the ’10 and 20 year rule’. Which means that if it was ten years ago, it’s disgusting (hence why J-Lo’s in the doldrums right now), but if it was 20 years ago, it must be amazing. So watch this space for the 2Unlimited revival – because it’s the 20th anniversary of ‘Get Ready For This‘ in 2011.

This rule, however, assumes that we might want a concept back in a million years. And there are plenty of exceptions for this. So while it’s unfortunate that we’re celebrating the 20th anniversary of negative equity with…yet more negative equity I do doubt whether there are trendsetters sitting in coffee shops saying:

“Ohmygod, shelling out for a new-build flat four years ago and finding out it’s worth 30 grand less than you paid for it is SO HOTRIGHTNOW. My friend Serge is totally doing that.”

I’m detecting there’s even less enthusiasm for passive smoking. This seems to have climbed out of the yellow label bin of public health scares and back into the collective consciousness this week. Bringing us such retro headlines as

Smoking ban proposed - BBC News
Smoking in cars: a ban too far – The Telegraph
Doctors demand smoking ban in private carsReuters
(And 208 other results, according to our friends at Google News.)

Putting aside the ethical considerations of smoking around your kids in a confined space for a moment, I can’t think of a more 90s concept than passive smoking. It’s like Tamagotchis, All Saints and POGs, which gripped us twenty years ago, but seem quaint and inconceivable now. And let’s not have it back, shall we?

So, for the good of all our sanities, let’s take the national unconscious decision to smoke less in the car. Because you know what’ll happen if we don’t. There’ll be a preachy TV advert campaign. We’ll have Ed Balls doing his unconvincing “think of the children” act all over the BBC. And someone, somewhere will inevitably think that it’s a good idea to use Twitter as a public health preaching platform, thus creating the new portmanteau word of ‘Tweaching’.

And that last reason alone is, I think, reason enough for us not to welcome this little bit of the 90s back into our homes.

But I’ll leave you with a piece of the 90s that is worth saving. Corona’s Rhythm of the Night, which is awesome.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
February 23rd, 2010 by Chris McCrudden

Trending Today – Justin Bieber

You may not know who he is yet, but Justin Bieber is a 16 year old Canadian R&B singer, and he’s trending very hard right now on Twitter (see the stats here, courtesy of What The Trend).

Regardless of whether an artist best described as a cross between Justin Timberlake and Miley Cyrus makes you want to scream in girlish delight or horror, the Bieber phenomenon reads like a social media fairy tale. He was discovered on YouTube by a record company executive after Bieber’s Mum uploaded videos of him singing to the site, ostensibly so that farflung friends and family could see her boy in action. This early online hype led to a bidding war between Usher and Justin Timberlake to sign Bieber (Usher won), and he went on to record 2009′s second best-selling debut album in the US, just behind the all-conquering Lady GaGa.

From these seemingly humble beginnings, Bieber now has 1.8 million fans on Facebook, his videos attract 5 million views apiece on YouTube and the widget below gives you an idea of how his teenage fanbase uses Twitter as an extension of playground popstar adulation.

That’s the official story anyway. Whether Bieber’s rise to fame is down to serendipity, or just the same kind of hothousing of talented children that’s already given us Beyonce Knowles, Venus and Serena Williams, Britney Spears and, erm, Jimmy Osmond, is a moot point.

Bieber’s current record sales are good, but not astonishing. What is phenomenal, however, is the level to which his fans’ use of social media to share their enthusiasm for Bieber, leaves an enormous footprint over Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, and turns a Canadian hit into a global sensation. The excitement may not last, but chances are the blurring of boundaries between official and fan promotion is here to stay.

new TWTR.Widget({
version: 2,
type: ‘search’,
search: ‘Bieber’,
interval: 6000,
title: ‘Everyone\’s talking about…’,
subject: ‘Justin Bieber’,
width: 250,
height: 300,
theme: {
shell: {
background: ‘#8ec1da’,
color: ‘#ffffff’
},
tweets: {
background: ‘#ffffff’,
color: ‘#444444′,
links: ‘#1985b5′
}
},
features: {
scrollbar: false,
loop: true,
live: true,
hashtags: true,
timestamp: true,
avatars: true,
behavior: ‘default’
}
}).render().start();
>

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
February 8th, 2010 by Chris McCrudden

Trending Today – Superbowl 2010

Ever since Ridley Scott ripped off 1984 and launched the cult of Apple, the Superbowl has been all about the adverts. And at $3 million for a thirty second spot, it’s the kind of real estate Donald Trump would trade his weave in for.

This year’s crop of Superbowl advertisers, however, are also maxing out their use of social media, trending hard on Twitter while sitting at the top of YouTube’s ‘Most Watched’ charts. But is there anything ‘super’ about the Superbowl ads themselves? Let’s have a quick browse…

Doritos

Doritos have clocked up more than half a million online views for this suite of four ads. All deploy the familiar trick of making snack food acceptable by suggesting that the heterosexual males who consume it are less intelligent than small children, dogs and psychopaths wearing samurai outfits made of corn chips. Hmmm.

Kia

“I may be a post-ironic cartoon mascot created to make a car manufacturer look cuddly and increase traction on social media, but I still like bowling. This makes me a regular guy.”

Prince Of Persia

Jake Gyllenhall’s first popcorn-movie starring role. Not that you can hear him for the explosions and ominous drumming. I’m not entirely sure this is a comment on the film itself, or the quality of his ‘English’ accent.

What have we learned?

They mightn’t be an inspiring bunch, but are the low production values of Superbowl 2010 ads a sign of shrinking budgets or changing channels?

Were the Doritos ads, for example, a TV campaign or an attempt to kickstart the viral sharing of ‘LOL! The kid hit him!’ moments on social networks? Given how hard they’re trending at the moment, it’s easy to see how effective social media can be at wringing extra value from your ad spend.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]