
- Image via Wikipedia
There’s a great post here from Andrew Smith here on social media metrics. He crunches link stats from the Guardian Twitter feed to make the point that the number of followers in a network is no measure of influence.
The Guardian Technology Twitter account has 564,698 followers. [….] Click through rates are around the 1,500 mark.
Even with a huge bunch of followers, the click through rates for links put out by Guardiantech on Twitter are around 0.4 per cent or less.
Now and again, a link of mine might generate 150 to 200 click throughs – so as a percentage of my Twitter followers that’s [close to 30 per cent].
Do read Andy’s full post. I’ve sub-edited it heavily. His point is well made. Numbers mean bugger all. Content and relevance are the key measures of authority and influence.

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=74ca6d82-c5cd-4a44-8b61-3d09231793d8)










Thanks for the response. Have a look at the New York Times (@nytimes) – they have nearly 1m followers – but click throughs are often barely into double digits….
http://bit.ly/app/search?q=nytimes