Twitter is developing as a platform for customer relations. It is an incredibly efficient and cost effective means to communicate with customers.
In the last 48 hours I’ve polled internet retailers to find out whether they have contingency plans in place for the national postal strike.

I asked a dozen brands using Twitter IDs sourced directly or via e-consultancy: @amazon; @CDWOWUK; @espares; @figleaveshome; @firebox; @grazedotcom; @Hotel_Chocolat; @lovefilm; @maplintweet; @overheardatmoo; @playcom; and @waterstonesltd.
I’ve had four responses from @espares, @figleaveshome, @firebox and @lovefilm. @mat_henton from espares deserves special praise. He responded within minutes.

It’s hardly exhaustive or scientific survey (a bit like real life) but it shows that a handful of internet retailers are making extraordinary efforts to use Twitter as a channel and tackle the impending postal strike.
Equally others are using Twitter as a broadcast channel or have work to do to put contingency plans in place for the postal strike.


![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=d496bfe4-c5c5-4b97-a3d8-d9cd593793fa)








What on earth makes you think it’s cost effective?
Hi Robin – Fair point. It has the potential to be cost effect for those businesses that are able to integrate it into their business process. Its the same issues that businesses faced in the late 90s re-engineering their businesses around email and web as a customer channel.
[...] See more here: Hit and miss customer service from Twittering internet retailers … [...]
Great idea, poor turn out, surely it proves just how far things need to go…
[...] week I bemoaned online retailers that are using Twitter as a one way channel to broadcast to [...]