<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meltwater to challenge NLA web licensing via UK Copyright Tribunal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/wadds/2009/12/17/meltwater-to-challenge-nla-web-licensing-via-uk-copyright-tribunal/feed/?12345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/wadds/2009/12/17/meltwater-to-challenge-nla-web-licensing-via-uk-copyright-tribunal/</link>
	<description>PR blog by Stephen Waddington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:13:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q&#38;A with Meltwater and NewsNow on NLA web licensing scheme &#124; Wadds' PR Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/wadds/2009/12/17/meltwater-to-challenge-nla-web-licensing-via-uk-copyright-tribunal/#comment-5446</link>
		<dc:creator>Q&#38;A with Meltwater and NewsNow on NLA web licensing scheme &#124; Wadds' PR Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/wadds/?p=1755#comment-5446</guid>
		<description>[...] has referred the issue to the UK Copyright Tribunal while NewsNow has reluctantly removed links to NLA member sites from its’ paid for products. Both [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has referred the issue to the UK Copyright Tribunal while NewsNow has reluctantly removed links to NLA member sites from its’ paid for products. Both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bm</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/wadds/2009/12/17/meltwater-to-challenge-nla-web-licensing-via-uk-copyright-tribunal/#comment-5445</link>
		<dc:creator>bm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/wadds/?p=1755#comment-5445</guid>
		<description>Actually the publisher should know what they are doing. It looks strange that they hide behind an agency that wants money from everybody. There is something weird going on here.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the publisher should know what they are doing. It looks strange that they hide behind an agency that wants money from everybody. There is something weird going on here&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/wadds/2009/12/17/meltwater-to-challenge-nla-web-licensing-via-uk-copyright-tribunal/#comment-5444</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speedcommunications.com/blogs/wadds/?p=1755#comment-5444</guid>
		<description>Good news. Although, it does make me wonder why the CIPR and PRCA couldn&#039;t take similar action on behalf of their members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news. Although, it does make me wonder why the CIPR and PRCA couldn&#8217;t take similar action on behalf of their members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.speedcommunications.com @ 2012-02-10 08:15:20 -->
