How do you respond when one of the PR industry’s top dogs compares your product to crack? I caught up with Gorkana’s Celina Maguire yesterday to find out.
“Mark Borkowski’s blog is always a good read. While we know he is being tongue-in-cheek when he says Gorkana […] is the technological equivalent of crack […], he spotlights a serious issue.”
“In my previous life as a consumer agency director we sweated over targeted media strategies for every client campaign, and counselled clients that coverage was about quality not quantity. While there was always enormous pressure to get more, our journalist relationships were too precious to risk bombarding them with crap.
“As Mark says in his post, spam could be avoided by using technology with a bit of intelligence and a willingness to listen on both sides. Use a bit of common sense.
“Mark’s blog highlights another issue which I think is making spamming more rife – sloppy or poor PR training. Any consultant knows that playing the numbers game by sending out press releases to a cast of thousands doesn’t constitute a PR strategy, yet this approach still seems to be rife.
“Gorkana seeks to bring PR and journalist communities closer together and help both save time. Our database provides a snapshot of what journalists write on, how they like to be approached, their interests, as well as the best time to make contact. It also lists journalists who do not ever want to be contacted by PRs.
“We also invest in breakfast briefings which bring senior journalists to the PR community so they can hear first-hand what the publication will or won’t cover.
“And from a techical point of view we stop duplicate emails being sent to the same journolists and we regularly monitor over sized client lists. While we aren’t big brother so can’t pull rank if a PR decides to email the world, we are always on the look out for ways to counter rabid spammers.
“Alexander Northcott, Gorkana’s CEO, is keen on a US idea where flaks using the HARO (Help A Reporter Out) system are handed a red card if they bombard journalists with irrelevant releases. Who knows if we’ll go down that route but the point is that we’re aware of the issues and are keen to engage with the industry and find a solution.”

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=d1ba737b-624d-41b3-b0dc-9e21121906ae)










I’d be happier if more journalists knew where we got their details from because so many of them don’t know about the likes of Gorkana and just assume we pull their names and contact details out of the ether.
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by speedcomms: Gorkana: Borkowski crack comment spotlights serious issue of PR spam http://goo.gl/fb/vbBa (@wadds) #pr #addnewtag…
A big thumbs up to Mark Borkowski, Gorkana and yourself Wadds for highlighting these issues. Intelligent use of technology can make the diffrence between spam and effective PR but there is a role for service providers like us to make it easier for the PR and journalist communities to engage with each other in an appropriate way. We’ve incorporated a number of ehancements to Response Source and FeaturesExec to this end and have quite few more up our sleeve that we’re working on.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Stephen Waddington, CIPR, John Brown, salleeann, VeronicaBotet and others. VeronicaBotet said: RT @wadds: [My blog] Gorkana: Borkowski crack comment spotlights serious issue of PR spam http://bit.ly/4POZf7 [...]