Visit speed website Wadd's PR and Media blog home
March 1st, 2010 by Wadds

Reputation Online: Copyright, defamation and privacy online vs. traditional media

Here’s an article that I’ve written for Reputation Online based on a presentation by media litigator Gideon Benaim, partner, Schillings Lawyers, at the CIPR Reputation Management conference in Manchester last month.

Mr Benaim made the case that social media is not beyond the reach of copyright, defamation or privacy laws. He cited cases where injunctions had been served on multiple ISPs as a defensive strategy to avoid the publication of sensitive corporate material and cautioned that rapid response was crucial.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
February 9th, 2010 by Wadds

Lord Lucas withdraws web link copyright amendment to the Digital Economy bill

Further to my blog post early today on the Right2Link campaign thanks to Andrew Smith for an update on Lord Lucas’ proposed amendment (292BA) to the Digital Economy bill seeking the “protection of the right to link to publicly available information on the internet.”

In a debate in the House of Lords last night lasting almost six hours Lord Lucas argued the case for fair usage:

“We ought to take the clear view that the breadth of knowledge on the web should be available to all, and that commercial interests on the web should be confined to relatively small corners of it and not allowed to take over vast swathes of it. In most cases, a search engine taking a small extract of copyright material-what is on a search engine is copyright material-should be regarded as fair usage and a proper part of the way in which the citizen and the copyright holder interact.”

Lord Lucas subsequently withdrew the amendment following a commitment from Lord Davies of Oldham to provide written assurances on behalf of the Government:

“The Government want-and the noble Lord did say how important it was for us to have a definition of what we wanted from the web-web users to continue to be able to use the web freely for legitimate uses, but we do not want to condone or to encourage copyright infringement. Those are the principles which underpin our approach to the web. Once again, I know that I am craving the noble Lord’s indulgence with such a sparse response to some intensive arguments, which he mercifully at this late hour kept to a few well-chosen words. We will write to him on all those amendments and I know very well that if he is less than satisfied with the responses on that very mildly-presented point, we may hear more from him. We will certainly bear that in mind in the letters that we write to him.”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
February 9th, 2010 by Wadds

Right2Link stink: Downing Street response required; NLA stands firm

On the day that David Cameron has promised to further democratise the legislative process, the Right2Link’s Downing Street e-petition calling for statutory protection for the right to link has clocked up 1,180 signatories.

It’s a long way from the 100,000 signatories that Cameron says will be required for an issue to be debated formally in the House of Commons but the issue continues to cause a stink and has passed the 500-threshold where it requires a response from Downing Street.

The move follows an amendment to the Digital Economy Bill tabled by Lord Lucas that would ensure “protection of the right to link to publicly available information on the internet.”

But the NLA’s managing director David Pugh said that he believed that Lord Lucas’ amendment was a bid to flush out views and is unlikely to become law.

“It is a fundamental principle of copyright that content owners can control the way in which their content is exploited. The market adequately addresses this issue already through website terms and conditions and licensing,” said Pugh.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]