Visit speed website Wadd's PR and Media blog home
September 3rd, 2010 by Wadds

Hague’s crisis PR response questionable; legal injunction would have shut down online rumours

William Hague must have reached the end of his tether. There’s no other reason why he would have issued the statement that he did on Wednesday.

In the 530-word statement Mr Hague denies an improper relationship with his now former aide Chris Myers.

It was prompted according to Mr Hague by rumours on the Internet and Westminster. Followers of Guido Fawkes may have been aware of the speculation and Westminster is always awash with rumour-mongering.

Mr Hague could have applied for an injunction to shut down rumours online.

Social media advocates will of course say that it’s impossible to close down stories online yet its a well applied tactic of both the PR and legal professions.

But instead Mr Hague chose to issue a statement which has now been widely reported by mainstream media placing the story on the mainstream news agenda.

Journalist are no doubt picking apart every line of the statement, Mr Hague continues to be bombarded with questions and Mr Myers’ personal life will no doubt be the subject of media scrutiny.

If the media finds evidence to substantiate the story you’ll almost certainly read about it on Sunday.

Enhanced by Zemanta
March 1st, 2010 by Wadds

Reputation Online: Copyright, defamation and privacy online vs. traditional media

Here’s an article that I’ve written for Reputation Online based on a presentation by media litigator Gideon Benaim, partner, Schillings Lawyers, at the CIPR Reputation Management conference in Manchester last month.

Mr Benaim made the case that social media is not beyond the reach of copyright, defamation or privacy laws. He cited cases where injunctions had been served on multiple ISPs as a defensive strategy to avoid the publication of sensitive corporate material and cautioned that rapid response was crucial.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]