Visit speed website Wadd's PR and Media blog home
May 20th, 2010 by Wadds

Report: Brands at risk in future of earned media and engagement

Alterian has published evidence that scrutinises how brands are engaging with consumers. Its based on qualitative and quantitative research in the UK and US.

The headline reports that 95 per cent of advertising spend in the 2009 had no impact on its intended audience.

By contrast the report finds that a third of consumers are actively engaged in social media and report a positive connection with brands.

According to David Eldridge, CEO, Alterian:

”We are witnessing is an era of individualisation. It is no longer adequate to adopt a strategy of mass broadcast and one-way conversation.”

Surveys are surveys that are typically used a tool to support a company’s own PR agenda. But this report is written by Professor Michael Hulme, an academic at Lancaster University, and speaks to a trend that cannot escape anyone in the communication, marketing or PR industries.

The risk, Alterian claims, is that brands will become irrelevant if they fail to engage with their audiences using relevant channels.

I’ll return to this report in future blog posts as it contains some great insight. Its only failing is that it stops short of describing how quickly these changes are taking place.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
May 5th, 2010 by Wadds

W+K’s Neil Christie on the UK election campaign: “it’s the BIG TELLY wot won it”

Another 24 hours and the election campaign will be over.

Wieden + Kennedy’s Neil Christie says that it’s been a disappointing campaign for the UK’s marketing industry: social media has played a limited role; creative thinking has been short supply; and when the history books are written it’ll be TV that won the election.

“This was the election that was supposed to be decided by mumsnet, fought out Obama-stylee across social media and where the only thing that was 100% certain was that old crappy media like TV would have no role whatsoever to play in the decision making process. But it hasn’t quite worked out that way has it?”

No it hasn’t.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
April 22nd, 2010 by Wadds

Traditional media dominating the election, says The Economist

The Economist (disclosure: client) carries an article today on why social media won’t play a factor in determining the outcome of the forthcoming General Election.

It claims that the leaders’ debates on television are a triumph for traditional media and that “much-touted social media such as Twitter is so niche as to be almost invisible”.

There’s also the demographic issue. Newspaper and TV audiences are older and more likely to vote.

The article ‘Shock of the old’ acknowledges that the TV debates have played out through social media but that when it comes to “voters who matter” its old media that is still the best.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
May 12th, 2009 by Wadds

Telegraph shows content is king

Good content will always attract eyeballs whether online or offline which is why there will always be a role in the media for people that have the ability to generate editorial content.

In the wake of the MP’s expense debacle, daily sales of The Telegraph have risen by a reported 90,000 from April’s average readership of 810,000 per day and the paper has seen its brand pushed far and wide across the media as journalists second source the story.

The challenge for The Telegraph is that this level of interest could only ever be sustained by an ongoing stream of similarly high profile content.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]