February 9th, 2010 by Wadds

Right2Link stink: Downing Street response required; NLA stands firm

On the day that David Cameron has promised to further democratise the legislative process, the Right2Link’s Downing Street e-petition calling for statutory protection for the right to link has clocked up 1,180 signatories.

It’s a long way from the 100,000 signatories that Cameron says will be required for an issue to be debated formally in the House of Commons but the issue continues to cause a stink and has passed the 500-threshold where it requires a response from Downing Street.

The move follows an amendment to the Digital Economy Bill tabled by Lord Lucas that would ensure “protection of the right to link to publicly available information on the internet.”

But the NLA’s managing director David Pugh said that he believed that Lord Lucas’ amendment was a bid to flush out views and is unlikely to become law.

“It is a fundamental principle of copyright that content owners can control the way in which their content is exploited. The market adequately addresses this issue already through website terms and conditions and licensing,” said Pugh.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
December 14th, 2009 by Wadds

NewsNow pulls links to national newspaper content from paid-for products

UK aggregator NewsNow today said that it would pull links to the sites of NLA members from its paid-for subscription services rather than sign-up to the NLA web licensing scheme.

“We believe that other organisations who privately agree with our position have reluctantly signed the NLA agreement under pressure. However, we are not in a position on our own to fund a extremely costly legal case on behalf of the entire industry,” said Struan Bartlett, managing director, NewsNow

NewsNow said that “the legal basis for the NLA’s claims that a licence is or was required remains unsubstantiated. It also took issue with the NLA’s reporting requirement to hand over customer details to the NLA.

“We see this as a slippery slop towards and free-to-access web site demanding licence fees from any organisation for circulating or cling on links,” said Bartlett.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
December 8th, 2009 by Wadds

David Phillips: Will newspapers credit online communities?

David Phillips is an author, lecturer and agency PR man. If you haven’t read the book he co-wrote with Sunderland University’s Philip Young called Online Public Relations then shame on you.

Phillips has brought a fresh perspective to the NLA debate by challenging the ownership of original content. It’s a debate that Phillips has supported with a real time case study.

“I went to this page in The Times, analysed it to get the semantic concepts. Looked for those concepts in Bing.com and found that loads of other people and publication wrote this story in similar terms long before The Times.”

“When The Times vanishes behind its firewall will this mean that it will pay all the other sites for the news it plagiarises from them as well as suing all the sites that use the same story after they publish offline or behind the firewall?”

“Who, then is going to set up the counter organisation to the NLA to get their money back from newspapers who borrow/plagiarise content from the online community?” asks Phillips.

Its Flat Earth News revisited. Phillips works from the premise that very little is original. And so we very quickly get into a debate about how original content is created and how you credit the originator and the organisations that circulate a story.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
December 8th, 2009 by Wadds

CIPR and PRCA stand firm in opposition to NLA web licence

The PR industry trade associations are standing firm on the issue of business-to-business web licensing. Here’s reaction from the CIPR and PRCA on news that the NLA’s licensing scheme will go ahead in the New Year.

“I can think of no other organisation that would charge you for improving the lifeblood of their business. Member schemes usually involve a reward, not a fee. […] I find it hard to accept that my members should pay fees for increasing the readership of content that is available free of charge.”
Kevin Taylor, President, CIPR

“[Our] position hasn’t changed. For so long as content is freely available, I think this is an unfair and legally un-enforceable charge.”
Francis Ingham, Director General, PRCA

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
December 3rd, 2009 by Wadds

NLA web clipping licence to go ahead; “small number of paid web aggregators” yet to sign up

I have followed the NLA’s plan to licence the use of paid-for business-to-business web content from newspaper web sites since the NLA announced its plans in June (search my blog for content tagged NLA for more information). Since then publishers have started to raise pay walls and take on Google in a bid to monitise content.

Six months is a long time on the Internet and especially so for newspaper publishers running loss making web operations.

The NLA said today that the web licensing scheme will go ahead from 1 January 2010. Press clipping agencies, web aggregators, PR agencies and client organisations that track web clippings on newspaper web sites will need a licence. Free consumer services will not be affected.

In September the NLA said that the move will generate an estimated £2 million and while this won’t make a significant dent in the £1 billion production budget of the UK newspaper industry, it will ensure that publishers recover a contribution from the after market for web clippings.

In a press release issued today the NLA said that it has reached agreement with almost all press cutting agencies but that it still needed to agree terms with “a small number of paid web aggregators”.

“Newspaper publishers, which own the NLA, have written to the remaining aggregators to express their full support for the NLA’s initiative. The letter makes clear that the publishers and NLA will pursue non-compliant aggregators with technical and/or legal measures as necessary.”

In agency-land any move to implement additional costs will be inevitably be challenged but the ongoing debate about monetising newspaper web content will help the NLA’s case.

The PR industry has responded badly to the NLA web licensing proposals because it has a mindset that content from newspapers web sites is free. And that’s true for now but its starting to change.

We have no way of knowing whether paywalls will work and how newspapers will manage their relationships with search engines. We’re only beginning to see some early indications.

In the meantime the NLA is proceeding with its model to recover revenue for its members.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
November 4th, 2009 by Wadds

Q&A with Durrants’ Jeremy Thompson on the Metrica deal, evaluation, aggregators and the NLA

JeremyThompson05I caught up with Jeremy Thompson this morning, managing director of  Durrants, to talk about media monitoring market, PR evaluation, aggregators and the NLA.

Durrants has been on the acquistion trail. It acquired Metrica last week and the UK print monitoring business of Cision UK in July.

The media monitoring sector is oft regarded as the commodity end of the PR industry and is almost certainly under reported – if Durrants was listed in the annual PR Week League tables it would make a top ten slot.

Under Thompson’s leadership Durrants is a £40 million business that is defining the emerging market segment that is media intelligence.

What is the strategic rational for Durrants’ acquisition of Metrica?
The thinking was to bring together the two leading players in the media monitoring and analysis space and deliver the best of both worlds through one integrated platform. The market is beginning to see the upside of integrated services – there are clear benefits of having access to planning data, content and media analysis, all in on place and seamlessly interlinked. And the demand for measurement is stronger than ever as the media world explodes and the need to demonstrate value grows.

How is the deal structured?
Can’t talk about specifics here but we have bought the business and have incentivised management to come with us for the long haul. We plan to run the two side-by-side for a period and integrate when we’ve planned and are ready to go. We’ll move to one platform, one business.

The deal speaks to the opportunity for formal planning and evaluation of PR. Are PR agencies getting smarter?
I’m sure they’re becoming smarter because they are definitely becoming more accountable. End users are all more interested in whether they have achieved a return on their investment and agencies are looking at smarter ways of doing that. And it is not just about column inches any more, it’s about whether they achieved their objectives, be that increased sales or enhanced reputation.

What is Durrants’ competitive response to aggregators?
Aggregators provide a low cost, low value service. They sit somewhere between Google News and media monitors. They can’t match us on service when it comes to complex searching across multiple channels; nor can they deliver in every format from multiple hard copy press packs to viewable BlackBerry clips. And they don’t monitor all channels from print, through TV and radio, to online and social media. We believe what we do adds real value, but we’ll keep listening to our market and adapt if we need to.

Why is the standard of service in the press clipping industry generally so poor? Many press clipping agencies haven’t modernised. Why is this?
What we do is complex. The briefs we work to are extensive and we always aim to find exactly what the customer wants, no more, no less. And everything we do is bespoke to each individual customer. We have invested more than most but occasionally even we get it wrong. I’d like to think that our customer service is first class, and that we go the extra mile to sort problems when they arise.

Do you think there will be further consolidation in the media monitoring and evaluation market?
I’m not sure how much more scope for consolidation there is right now. And if there is, we won’t be doing it; we have enough on our plate with Cision’s UK print monitoring business and Metrica.

The Newspaper Licensing Association: friend or foe?
We recognise publisher rights and we totally understand that we should pay for the commercial re-use of publisher content. To that end, it is useful to be able to deal with a third party rather than to have to go to each publisher direct (we monitor 5,000 print titles in the UK alone). The NLA had a poor reputation historically, but they have worked hard under their current MD, David Pugh, to rectify that. And I think they have made progress, even if they are still not the PR industry’s favorite organisation. They haven’t handled the PR around their online initiative particularly well, and we’re still frustrated by their unwillingness to challenge Google under the same terms that they treat us. But overall, friend right now.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!