September 20th, 2009 by Wadds

“Has-been” politicos lead way on Twitter

photo-11The UK political parties have a long way to go to incorporate social media into their communication planning according to Alastair Campbell.

“Myself and John Prescott are two of the most followed people on Twitter in UK politics. Yet we’re both bloody has-beens,” said Campbell.

Campbell (@campbellclaret) has 9,200 followers whereas Prescott (@JohnPrescott) has 6,700.

Campbell uses Twitter to promote his blog and said that it is an incredibly effective means of connecting with people. He claimed that politicians are trapped in old media and are yet to fully capitialise on the potential of social media.

“When I was working with Tony in the mid-90s if we led the BBC News and had a splash in The Sun and The Times we used to say that we’d dominated the agenda. It’s no longer true. It helps of course but there are lots of other channels to get your head round,” said Campbell.

“The parties haven’t cracked [social media] yet,” he said.

Campbell addressed an invited group of communication professionals at a dinner at The Capital Restaurant in London hosted by Durrants on Thursday evening. He is best known for his role as former British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s spokesman, press secretary and director of communications and strategy.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
July 17th, 2009 by Wadds

Red Narrative’s Luke Bozier on the Labour party, the Afghan election, LabourList and the next UK General Election

I caught up with Luke Bozier this week. He’s the managing director of Red Narrative, the agency that is advising Dr Ashraf Ghani, a leading contender to replace President Karzai in August’s presidential election in Afghanistan, on social media strategy.

It’s a long post. But I make no apologies. Bozier’s frontline views on the Labour party, the Afghan election, LabourList and the forthcoming UK General Election are well worth reading.

Thanks to Mark Hanson for the introduction.

Q. The Red Narrative brand implies a left of centre leaning. What’s your background?

I’ve been a Labour member for just under three years. I previously worked at Labour HQ, advising Tony Blair and the wider party on strategic online communication, and since then for other centre-left politicians here and abroad.

I believe in the [Labour] party’s values, of society looking after everybody, and I want my work to help socially-minded politicians around the world to be able to communicate effectively.

Q. There are two prongs to your strategy for Dr Ashraf Ghani: raising awareness and raising funds? Can you describe how it will be delivered?

A. Raising awareness by running the best website of the whole election. Our content is updated daily, is available in English and the two local Afghan languages. We issue regular press releases via an email group of journalists. We also have a large list of email subscribers, mainly Afghans from around the world and in the country. On top of this, we send regular messages to our Facebook groups, and use Twitter to spread the word.

Donations are solicited through the website, and have so far been very successful (in the tens of thousands of US dollars). Anyone with a credit or debit card can log on to the site and make a donation in just a few minutes.

Q. How will you measure success of your campaign for Dr Ashraf Ghani beyond a successful election win?

A. I hope Dr Ashraf Ghani will win the election and if so the group of supporters we have created online can then be channelled into raising awareness of issues inside Afghanistan, and encouraged to take action themselves. Often when people leave their home country it’s hard to stay connected to the national political scene – we hope that through the Internet, and with this campaign, we have inspired the younger Afghans abroad to take an interest in the politics of their country at this turning point in their history.

Equally, whoever is running Afghanistan after August, they need to be kept honest; the Internet is perfect for this. I hope that the people that have been inspired by the Dr Ashraf Ghani campaign feel that they can organise online to promote political developments in the country and ensure that the government is as transparent and efficient as possible.

Q. How does Red Narrative win clients and can tell us about a campaign that you are proud of?

A. I personally meet a lot of politicians and people working for politicians and people running for office. With the success of the Obama campaign last year, the vast majority of people either seeking or already in public office now recognise that the Internet and new media are crucial parts of any communication or campaign strategy, so to some extent my work is already done.

Red Narrative is also pro-active in lobbying certain politicians or groups of politicians to consider carrying out specific projects which are of benefit to them, and then we work with them if they are interested.

A campaign I’m proud of – tough question. I’ve worked on so many interesting projects, from the first online consultation, to web-based inter-cultural dialogue programmes, to putting Tony Blair on YouTube and now helping Afghanistan to run modern campaigns in the post-Taliban era. I’ve also done a lot of domestic work with little-known politicians who are working hard for the people in their constituencies.

I wouldn’t want to single out one campaign, but the Dr Ashraf Ghani for President campaign is certainly the most though-provoking, and the one which could have the largest potential impact on a nation and society.

Q. What’s your view of  the LabourList project?

A. Initially I was sceptical, and Derek Draper is a divisive figure. But before he left, and to his credit, he succeeded in getting the whole Labour community to recognise it as a viable outlet and place for internal dialogue. Politicians and activists from across the board have written on a plethora of subjects there, and it’s something to applaud. Alex Smith is doing a great job in keeping it going, and there are some interesting developments since he took over, such as the partnership with the Huffington Post.

However, LabourList’s big drawback is that it is just an internal talking post. I know Derek initially saw it as something wider, something that would engage “millions” of non-political British folk. I don’t think it’s the platform for that, and it’s sad that Labour as the governing party hasn’t yet come up with that kind of national political forum. But as a Labour platform, I think it’s great.

Q. What impact do you expect social media to have on the 2010 UK election?

A. I’m sure there will be a tangible impact, but not as profound as I would like. Unfortunately the political system in Great Britain is not one which will facilitate a ground-breaking, election-winning online/social media campaign such as the Obama campaign. Our system doesn’t allow insurgent candidates to come out of nowhere and take the stage, which means that the Internet’s ability to rally hundreds of thousands of people around an “underdog” candidate are redundant here. That’s not to say that parties shouldn’t take it seriously, and I hope Labour puts social media and e-campaigning more central to its strategy and structure as an organisation.

I think the space where the biggest potential for social media to impact the election is on its coverage and analysis. The blogosphere (and Twittersphere) will be alive from the second Gordon calls the election (in fact, I would like to see him announce it in an innovative way – maybe he could send a Twitter message to the Queen: “@QEII Your Majesty, I am now advising you to dissolve Parliament and call a general election. Cheers, your Prime Minister #ge2010″ – only 120 chars!).

There’s still a good chance that Parliament will be hung, which will provide fodder to the bloggers and Twits to create online drama. I’m sure we will see Tweets and blogs coming from result announcements all across the country, some of which will be dramatic, in the same way as the Michael Portillo 1997 loss was dramatic; this time they will be captured and uploaded to YouTube and Twitter.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
June 8th, 2009 by Wadds

Crowdsourcing and the BNP: debate, don’t censor

Twitter has been alive with outrage today at the BNP’s success in winning two seats in the European elections. There have been calls to block the BNP’s Twitter accounts and a Not In My Name Meme has kicked off. The election results are shocking not because a minority party with far right views won two seats, but that two-thirds of the UK didn’t vote.

Social networks are truly democratic. Authority in a network is developed by building reputation. We’re quick to celebrate examples of crowdsourcing when a motivated group of individuals is able to turn around opinion and create positive change, but we’re upset that this is precisely what the BNP has done in this instance.

The BNP’s new European Parliament members have been elected via a democratic process. Whatever your views please don’t turn the party into a martyr that will promote its cause. Instead use your networks to promote discussion via free speech. Only then will the BNP’s views become truly known and more people will be motivated to vote in future elections.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
May 12th, 2009 by Wadds

Telegraph shows content is king

Good content will always attract eyeballs whether online or offline which is why there will always be a role in the media for people that have the ability to generate editorial content.

In the wake of the MP’s expense debacle, daily sales of The Telegraph have risen by a reported 90,000 from April’s average readership of 810,000 per day and the paper has seen its brand pushed far and wide across the media as journalists second source the story.

The challenge for The Telegraph is that this level of interest could only ever be sustained by an ongoing stream of similarly high profile content.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
April 29th, 2009 by Wadds

Pay politicians properly

politiciansThe MP’s expenses debate is a perennial issue. Instead of debating claims for pay-per-view porn, bath plugs or Brown’s proposed attendance allowance let’s hear the case for paying politicians a salary commensurate with their executive role so that ridiculous expenses claims can be eliminated.

Backbench MPs earn £60,000 a year which is less than a communications director or a director in the PR industry according to PR Week’s 2008 salary survey. But, it’s still a damn sight more than the average salary of £25,000 in the UK. Which I guess is why no politician of any party will ever tackle the issue.

You wonder what kind of educated person chooses to be a politician when it pays – financially and in terms of work life balance – to pursue a more conventional career. Should we be surprised that we end up with so many apparently dysfunctional individuals as politicians?

Paying politicians properly rather than a dubious cocktail of salary and expenses might even attract some new talent and raise standards. But, in politics, like most other areas of life, it seems that you get what you pay for.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!