May 24th, 2010 by Wadds

Will the iPad kill print? Will it hell

Steve Jobs while presenting the iPad in San Fr...
Image via Wikipedia

I returned to the NEC, Birmingham today to participate in PIRA’s Great Print Debates for a session that pitched the iPad against print.

The iPad will no more spell the end of print than any previous generation of technology. Radios, TVs, PCs, CD-ROMs and the internet were all at one time set to hasten the demise of print.

The iPad is simply another device in the ongoing narrative of an industry reeling from the shift towards advertising online, the internet as a low cost real time distribution platform, and competition for consumer attention from screen based media.

Frank Romano, Professor Emeritus, Rochester Institute of Technology, did an excellent job as chair in navigating the issues facing the print industry. He divided the market up into three segments for ease of the discussion. Here’s a summary of the debate.

  • Newspapers – the game was up long before Apple dreamt up the iPad. Newspapers have never recovered from the loss of classified advertising to online and the availability of free news content. Publishers are valiantly trying to build alternative funding models ranging from micro payments to clubs and from firewalls to traffic-baiting content supported by ads.
  • Books – the market splits clearly into fiction and non-fiction. Consumers are unlikely to give-up the convenience or familiarity of paperbacks or the kudos of a recently published hardback any time soon. Electronic books are likely to become a convenience item for travellers but are unlikely to make a significant impact on print sales. Non-fiction books are likely to move online in time as a digital format provides a means to promote richer content, revisions and updates, and is a means to create a community.
  • Magazines – There’s strong evidence to support the view that the future of business-to-business magazines lies in a digital model as display advertising continues to decline and content moves to the web. But the story for consumer titles is very different with several standout successes. Magazines are artefacts typically focused around a rich content proposition or strong niche. As long as publishers can create compelling content and the cost of publication and distribution makes it viable the consumer magazine industry will continue.

You can follow the conversation after the debate on the IPEX forum on LinkedIn.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
April 11th, 2010 by Wadds

Q&A with Wikinut founder: UK publishing start-up offers revenue share platform for writers

Wikinut is a UK publishing start-up that provides a branded platform for contributors to take a revenue share from advertising served alongside their content. Contributors can earn addition revenue by referring new contributors or becoming a moderator. Topics include range from self-improvement to business and from personal finance to family issues.

It’s the brainchild of founder Andy Walton. I caught up with him this weekend.


Give us the elevator pitch?
Wikinut is a new publishing community – you own the content, you keep the copyright, your name is all over it and we pay you lifetime royalties of all revenue generated.

How many pages have you got and how often do contributors add new content?
On average to date, our authors write about 5 pages each. Obviously this is spread across some prolific members at one end of the scale, and more casual authors at the other.

Many authors will add at least one page every day, others less frequently. All content is pre-moderated to ensure it is not copied, and meets our content guidelines.

Our average moderation time is well under 12 hours, and usually just a few hours so this process keeps the quality high without slowing down the publication.

Wikinut has only been live for a quarter, but even at this early stage we have thousands of unique pages with a very strong growth trend.

How many contributors have you got and how motivated are they?
Without giving exact numbers, we have a very healthy and rapidly growing community of authors. These authors are from all over the world; the UK, US, Australia and New Zealand, with many more Asian countries such as India, Thailand, the Philippines etc. This has really helped with the variety of content added, and has been a very pleasant surprise for us.

Our authors all have 2 main motivations: community and money.

Our last user survey indicated our users loved the sense of community, and they tell us that is as important as money for them.

We’ve had a far higher number of page comments that we’d anticipated, with readers and authors really engaging. Authors love to receive feedback so we also work hard on our moderation feedback and our author support. We also recently added an author follow feature (think Twitter) which has been well received and have more similar ideas in the development pipeline.

From the money angle, authors not only get their royalty share of pages they write, but also receive a 10% share of any friends they refer. This has been a great source of new users, and we also offer promo codes with certain partners to offer enhanced royalties.

Plus our best authors can be invited to become a moderator, which then allows another source of income as they are paid a share of any pages they publish.

Is it possible to make a living using WikiNut? Or as part of a wider portfolio career?
Most of our authors treat Wikinut as a hobby. Our professional writers tend to use Wikinut as one part of a portfolio of outlets for their writing. We are not currently aware of any professional Wikinut-only authors, but we believe it would be possible (especially for those users from Asia).

How do you promote content – and attract an audience and new contributors?
We are still operating our 2-pronged launch strategy for growth:

1) Organic – be this via search traffic (heavily SEO influenced markup, tags, content-hub information architecture), site reviews (such as our webuser.co.uk review), or high traffic blog posts (blog owners incentivised with our 10% affiliate scheme, plus guest posts contributed by ourselves)

2) Social networking – in addition to our refer-a-friend scheme, we teach our authors to promote their content on Facebook, Twitter etc. We have CRM email tutorials to hand-hold our authors through self-promotion, with case-studies and real world examples

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
April 5th, 2010 by Wadds

Johnston Press on regional paywalls (they don’t work) and insight from a former Trinity Mirror editor

Northumberland Gazette editor Paul Larkin reported on the end of Johnston Press’ paywall trial in his paper this week.

“The trial was initially planned to take place over a three-month period, starting at the end of November, but was extended by one month to ensure sufficient data was collected.”

“It was the first phase of an ongoing review of how Johnston Press should manage its news provision online.”

Steve met-up with former Birmingham Mail (Trinity Mirror) editor Steve Dyson last week. He concluded that regional publishers are failing to engage readers online and that “[...] done right, the internet offers opportunities for regional publishers to address some of the weaknesses in their business models that have been building for years (e.g. ad sales sliding yet people prepared to pay for pictures that feature their kids or interest groups).”

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
April 1st, 2010 by Wadds

Book review: Felix Dennis’ 88 the Narrow Road

Felix Dennis amassed a fortune worth the best part of a billion dollars during his career as a publisher.

Four years ago he told the story of his success in an anti-self help book called How to Get Rich. In March his latest text for wannabe entrepreneurs hit the shelves.

88 the Narrow Road isn’t really a book. It’s a tool to read in a single sitting and then pick-up and put-down when you’re in need of inspiration.

And make no doubt it’s inspirational. Dennis covers what he believes are the more crucial 88 areas of entrepreneurship in short chapters, from raising money to hiring and inspiring talent, and from tenacity to excellence.

But the entrepreneur-turned-poet issues a stark warning planning to follow 88 the Narrow Road.

“It’s a step-by-step guide to acquiring money. But you will pay the price. Those that tread the narrow road walk in single file. Shadows plague each wary step. Hazard haunts each mile,” says Dennis.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
March 17th, 2010 by Wadds

Reputation Online on Times Online blocks

Vikki Chowney was kind enough to ask me for my thoughts on the news yesterday that Times Online has blocked Meltwater from spidering its site for her latest article on Reputation Online - Meltwater in a tizz over Times block, but does really anyone care?

Here’s my interview with Vikki in full.

The action by The Times to block News Now and now Meltwater is another example of a publishers setting out the battlelines in the fight to challenge the business model of aggregators and online clipping agency. The move will inevitably hurt Meltwater. Clients rely on it to provide a comprehensive service and a fragmented monitoring service isn’t helpful if you are charged with managing the reputation of a business.

But it’s odd that The Times is taking this direct action against Meltwater and News Now yet News International is not exercising the NLA’s new web clipping license despite being an NLA member. It shows the ongoing turmoil in publishing industry and it attempts to shift from print to online.

The publishing industry is in real pain as it attempts to monetise its content online. Ad revenues have collapsed and circulation figures are down. Publishers are seeking to create new business models around their content online and believe that third parties that generate income from aggregating and monitoring their content should share the income they generate.

Attitudes will change over the next 18 months as newspaper publishers raise paywalls in front of their sites – and news articles are replaced by summaries in Google News searches.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
August 27th, 2009 by Wadds

Local bloggers need anonymity and legal protection

My blog post comparing the role of the journalist with that of a local blogger triggered intense discussion in the comments.

I’m signed up as a contributor to a project in the North East and said that as a member of a community there are absolute no go areas as I need to stay on friendly terms with neighbours.

The post has attracted comment from several hyper local bloggers contributing to projects through the UK and further afield. Almost all are concerned about personal exposure and the lack of backup both in terms of the support of a newsroom and the legal infrastructure of a publisher.

Have a read if you get chance. There is no doubt hyper local media is viable and that local bloggers are able to provide the content and reach of a regional newspaper but the issues of personal anonymity and legal protection need be tackled.

Related posts:

Why local bloggers may never compete with local media – 12 August, 2009
Journalists: devalued and misunderstood?
– 7 July, 2009
The Newcastle Journal’s hyperlocal project (and a new channel for chicken updates)
– 24 June, 2009
Trendwatch: Hyperlocalism
– 28 May, 2009


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!
May 15th, 2009 by Wadds

Thinking Digital: Exploring new publishing models

Wired deputy editor Ben Hammersley joined the ranks of speakers at Thinking Digital this afternoon that have called time on the traditional publishing model.

“[The premise that…] people won’t pay for content is a myth propagated by big media. The reality is that people won’t pay for their media anymore,” he said.

Hammersley said that consumers will pay for quality, crafted content pertinent to their personal interests.

“Content publishers need to stop chasing numbers and pursue quality, elegance and craftsmanship instead. Digital is enabling interesting stuff to be made [and distributed] at low cost to small audiences,” he added.

Russell Davies and Ben Terrett from the Really Interesting Group may have cracked the means for content producers in the digital environment to publish their work in a physical newspaper format.

The duo is behind the Things Our Friends Have Written On The Internet 2008 project, a beautifully designer newspaper of content drawn from around their digital networks. The publication was so admired that it has inspired a Flickr group.

Davies and Terrett have now raised funding from Channel 4’s seed fund 4iP to develop a tool to enable anyone make the transition from content on screen to a printed format.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
emailAdd to del.icio.usDigg This!Share on FacebookStumble It!